Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

The reviews are coming in for Meghan's podcast 'Confessions of a Female Founder'ions of a

1000 replies

LaBarruci · 08/04/2025 16:54

Not listened to the first in Meghan's podcast series, a conversation with the founder of Bumble, Whitney Wolfe Heard, but the Mail has collated all the press reviews so far, with links. The Guardian, Telegraph and i-Paper are unanimous: the podcast is cloyingly dreadful.

The reviews for Meghan Markle's latest podcast are in! Two stars for Confessions of a Female Founder https://mol.im/a/14584193 via https://dailym.ai/android

OP posts:
Thread gallery
39
myrtleWilson · 15/04/2025 19:30

For the love of god @LipglossAlly Since this morning (UK time) 4 posters have had posts deleted
Poster D - 1 post
Poster L - 1post
Poster P - 1post
you - 6 indvidual posts

Please stop going on about screenshots and threatening to post them - you are sounding like you are stalking/bullying someone. Perhaps reflect on your own posting behaviour as evidenced by mods deleting your posts.

PrettyFlyforaMaiTai · 15/04/2025 19:33

myrtleWilson · 15/04/2025 19:30

For the love of god @LipglossAlly Since this morning (UK time) 4 posters have had posts deleted
Poster D - 1 post
Poster L - 1post
Poster P - 1post
you - 6 indvidual posts

Please stop going on about screenshots and threatening to post them - you are sounding like you are stalking/bullying someone. Perhaps reflect on your own posting behaviour as evidenced by mods deleting your posts.

7 actually!

wigsonthegreenandhatsforthelifting · 15/04/2025 19:35

PigglyWigglyOhYeah · 15/04/2025 18:59

How the menz must be chuckling - all these successful business ladies, but all they go on about are their lady problems.

This is what annoys me about this, too, and it's really undermining for women in the workplace when other women seem to only want to talk about 'business' through the prism of 'having a vagina'. Perhaps I am of a different generation, but when I started out in the workplace it was considered appalling to excuse any lapses in professionalism by saying things like, 'I have PMT' or 'I've got my period' or 'It must be the menopause'. You just bloody well got on with it.

We had a senior member of staff do a presentation of few months to roomful of 40 or more posters, men and women, including a head of service. She started off by announcing that she was perimenopausal, and might forget her words.

Oh how hard we all cringed...!

wigsonthegreenandhatsforthelifting · 15/04/2025 19:37

JADS · 15/04/2025 18:53

Back to the podcast, this isn't a business podcast. I know there were a few posts saying that Meghan was a good interviewer but I don't think she is. It's not incisive, there was a bit about Bumble's share price tanking and Meghan doesn't ask any difficult questions, it's all about letting go and bottling your essence.

Reshma Saujani and Girls Who Code sound interesting, but I'm not sure I can wade through the treacle to get there. When Meghan giggles and talks about "girl talk" in the trailer, that should have been a clue. I had hopes for this output being part of a more cohesive set up, but as ever it's just all a bit dull. I always feel like Meghan is trying to hold something back.

You can't mix 'business' with 'girl talk' and expect to be taken seriously!

Uricon2 · 15/04/2025 19:43

StrawberryWasp · 15/04/2025 19:15

The way MM talks about motherhood is weird.

She looks at photos of them constantly when they're not in the same room.
And can't have a bath or do exercise because she just wants to cuddle them all the time.

That is either made up fake bullshit that she thinks is how loving mothers act or she is insane and obsessed with her children in a damaging way.

It's presumably the first option as she seems to manage to fly around promoting herself whilst tolerating separation from her kids longer than a bath would take.

She's such an obvious liar. It's really really weird.

Is this the podcast? Blimey.

The fact she can drag herself away to Nigeria, Colombia, NYC etc rather exposes it as fallacious. I know Diana insisted William accompany them to Australia for a tour when he was really little and there was a song and dance about it, but I think she actually dug her heels in and refused to be away from him for an extended period.

Money where her mouth was, rather than performative parenting to look good.

myrtleWilson · 15/04/2025 19:44

@wigsonthegreenandhatsforthelifting I wouldn't announce that at the start of a presentation necessarily, however, I've been more open recently about how the menopause has impacted on the way I work - I used to have an amazing memory and now don't and find I need to take way more notes than ever before and when I am stumbling, I acknowledge the difficulties of the menopause publicly. Studies have suggested that up to 10% of women leave work because of their symptoms so I'm more comfortable to speak out - I'm CEO of a charity and kinda feel a responsibility to speak from my more privileged (relative!) position.

Rhaidimiddim · 15/04/2025 19:46

PigglyWigglyOhYeah · 15/04/2025 18:59

How the menz must be chuckling - all these successful business ladies, but all they go on about are their lady problems.

This is what annoys me about this, too, and it's really undermining for women in the workplace when other women seem to only want to talk about 'business' through the prism of 'having a vagina'. Perhaps I am of a different generation, but when I started out in the workplace it was considered appalling to excuse any lapses in professionalism by saying things like, 'I have PMT' or 'I've got my period' or 'It must be the menopause'. You just bloody well got on with it.

Indeed.

And I think it is right that the workplace has adjusted to acknowledge women's bloody (literally) stupid reproductive system.

I think putting together a podcast that has as guests very successful women, and then not delving into the trajectories of their careers and buinesses is false advertising. And I think this series is not doing justice to its guests' achievements. More fool them, then for agreeing to be involved; but, if they are being viewed as representative of serious women, by being dragged down to the intellectual level at which MM operates, they are doing businesswomen a disservice.

Like Polo did for the sport's world image.

(Did today's podcast come with a miscarriage TW, by the way?)

JADS · 15/04/2025 19:47

wigsonthegreenandhatsforthelifting · 15/04/2025 19:37

You can't mix 'business' with 'girl talk' and expect to be taken seriously!

Agreed.

I guess I was hoping that it would be mostly business with a touch of girl talk. I listen to a podcast where the hosts interviews guests generally academics or authors and at the end, she will ask some get to know you questions, fun facts. I quite like that and the host is knowledgeable and charming. I was hoping it would be more like that not girl talk from the outset.

I said in a previous thread that people like Harry are the reason we now do EDI training. By the end of this podcast I fear it will be, people like Meghan are the reason women aren't taken seriously in business.

Serenster · 15/04/2025 19:50

More fool them, then for agreeing to be involved; but, if they are being viewed as representative of serious women, by being dragged down to the intellectual level at which MM operates, they are doing businesswomen a disservice.

Archewell’s annual accounts for 2022 show a grant of $65,000 to Girls Who Code, so this could well have been in the nature of a quid pro quo.

garlicandsapphires · 15/04/2025 19:50

Didn't she leave her kids to go abroad for tennis matches or something when they were very little?
I have not been blessed with children sadly, so can't speak from experience, but those of you can, is that a normal motherly thing to do?

RandyRedHumpback · 15/04/2025 19:51

I've listened to a bit of MM's podcast with Reshma Saujani. The opening gambit is that they met at a Kensington Palace event, and when MM asks RS why she was there, she says because you (Meghan) are an "amazing human". This seems to be a pre-requisite of being on this podcast.

Rhaidimiddim · 15/04/2025 19:55

RandyRedHumpback · 15/04/2025 19:51

I've listened to a bit of MM's podcast with Reshma Saujani. The opening gambit is that they met at a Kensington Palace event, and when MM asks RS why she was there, she says because you (Meghan) are an "amazing human". This seems to be a pre-requisite of being on this podcast.

Oh god, I am cringing!

Dolaly · 15/04/2025 19:59

Where is the vomit emoji when you need it !

Uricon2 · 15/04/2025 19:59

I've been on one of the other recent threads about the strange (non astronaut) mission this week. The whole thing, from most of the participants and Oprah emoting to the general dumbed down, antifeminist, all for self promotion crassness of it all put me very much in mind of how Meghan operates. Word salad, photo ops, memememe and my specialness, with no substance and very little style of any note.

MrsLeonFarrell · 15/04/2025 20:03

RandyRedHumpback · 15/04/2025 19:51

I've listened to a bit of MM's podcast with Reshma Saujani. The opening gambit is that they met at a Kensington Palace event, and when MM asks RS why she was there, she says because you (Meghan) are an "amazing human". This seems to be a pre-requisite of being on this podcast.

Meghan needs to realise that this sort of over the top language isn't helping her be taken seriously. It's cringe worthy.

prelovedusername · 15/04/2025 20:03

garlicandsapphires · 15/04/2025 19:50

Didn't she leave her kids to go abroad for tennis matches or something when they were very little?
I have not been blessed with children sadly, so can't speak from experience, but those of you can, is that a normal motherly thing to do?

We all have different tolerances I think. Some may be ok with it (not me). I think most of us would baulk at leaving our tiny children several times zones away.

RandyRedHumpback · 15/04/2025 20:07

MM says about miscarriage (comparing it to business) that "...you have to learn to detach from the thing that you have so much promise and hope for and to be able to be OK at a certain point to let something go, something go that you planned to love for a long time."

As someone who has miscarried, I find the terminology alone - "the thing", "something" - impossible to relate to. Let alone the notion of "detachment" and "planning" to love.

Lazycatsitsonthemat · 15/04/2025 20:11

RandyRedHumpback · 15/04/2025 20:07

MM says about miscarriage (comparing it to business) that "...you have to learn to detach from the thing that you have so much promise and hope for and to be able to be OK at a certain point to let something go, something go that you planned to love for a long time."

As someone who has miscarried, I find the terminology alone - "the thing", "something" - impossible to relate to. Let alone the notion of "detachment" and "planning" to love.

She just sounds so fucked up on so many levels every time she makes some grand speech.

smilesy · 15/04/2025 20:12

RandyRedHumpback · 15/04/2025 20:07

MM says about miscarriage (comparing it to business) that "...you have to learn to detach from the thing that you have so much promise and hope for and to be able to be OK at a certain point to let something go, something go that you planned to love for a long time."

As someone who has miscarried, I find the terminology alone - "the thing", "something" - impossible to relate to. Let alone the notion of "detachment" and "planning" to love.

Apart from the fact that it is a crass and insensitive way to talk about the loss of a baby, its word salady nonsensical bollocks

meercat23 · 15/04/2025 20:14

RandyRedHumpback · 15/04/2025 20:07

MM says about miscarriage (comparing it to business) that "...you have to learn to detach from the thing that you have so much promise and hope for and to be able to be OK at a certain point to let something go, something go that you planned to love for a long time."

As someone who has miscarried, I find the terminology alone - "the thing", "something" - impossible to relate to. Let alone the notion of "detachment" and "planning" to love.

I am not even going to tell you how long ago my miscarriage was but I have never forgotten . That little one is still in my heart even if I don't talk about them now. It took me 20 years to even cry properly about that little lost one. Detach from the thing.....words fail me. I think that wording probably came from the desire to shoehorn her own experience onto the discussion but it was clumsy at best to say the least.

TheNinkyNonkyIsATardis · 15/04/2025 20:20

As someone who hasn't had a miscarriage, I felt it wasn't my place to comment, but I found her words oddly chosen.

You don't HAVE to follow any form of response or grief. You don't have to detach. I know people who have and people who haven't.

Lunde · 15/04/2025 21:12

garlicandsapphires · 15/04/2025 19:50

Didn't she leave her kids to go abroad for tennis matches or something when they were very little?
I have not been blessed with children sadly, so can't speak from experience, but those of you can, is that a normal motherly thing to do?

They seem to leave their kids in different countries quite often. They left Archie in Canada while they came to the UK to sort Megxit.

Dalky · 15/04/2025 21:12

Shes's very good at detaching very ruthlessly though from all of her close relationships eg NP her bestie from school, her first husband, her father, every single member of her extended family (Raglands), her talent agent, her BFF JM, her chef boyfriend - no doubt loads of other staff and colleagues who she has hounded out of their livelihoods and others who have just sloped off. Do we think the new PR person who started last month is still working for them?

glitterturd · 15/04/2025 21:14

Dolaly · 15/04/2025 19:59

Where is the vomit emoji when you need it !

🤮🤮🤮🤮

glitterturd · 15/04/2025 21:15

Serenster · 15/04/2025 19:50

More fool them, then for agreeing to be involved; but, if they are being viewed as representative of serious women, by being dragged down to the intellectual level at which MM operates, they are doing businesswomen a disservice.

Archewell’s annual accounts for 2022 show a grant of $65,000 to Girls Who Code, so this could well have been in the nature of a quid pro quo.

Bingo!

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.