Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

How will the Royal Family end?

856 replies

JoyousGreyOrca · 13/02/2025 15:31

The Royal Family will end. Not yet obviously. But within the next generation.

People often assume institutions like this fall slowly and gradually. We see a bit of that already happening with the reduction in "working" Royals, far less favourable poll results than when Queen Elizabeth reigned, and the willingness of the media to be more critical of the Royal Family.

I have seen people commenting assuming this means the Royal family will end soon. I think they misunderstand what is happening.

But society is changing and the deference that Queen Elizabeth attracted can no longer be taken for granted. Colonies are no longer happy for the Royals to carry out cosplay colonial tours on their soil, and increasingly they will remove the King as their Head of State. But I think when the end comes it will be sudden and unexpected. Similar to the fall of the Soviet Union. A clear weakening of the institution, but then a sudden, and shocking fall.

The aftermath will be very messy though as the Royal family try and fight for as much of the states wealth as they can, using the courts if they need to.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
21
TulipTiptoer · 14/02/2025 22:35

Reetpetitenot · 14/02/2025 22:33

So why are Harry and Meghan continually acting more like royalty than the rf, with their pseudo tours and their 'charity' work, their insistence on the use iof titles? Being royal is all they have.

Can we not derail with this.surely? There's enough threads on how awful they are elsewhere, why do we have to go into all of this on a thread about the monarchy and it's future

TulipTiptoer · 14/02/2025 22:36

Samcro · 14/02/2025 22:30

What a shame that a thread in the Royal family topic that is for once not about a certain couple has been derailed.

@JoyousGreyOrca hope you’re ok

It never stops. It is really really boring

Samcro · 14/02/2025 22:36

TulipTiptoer · 14/02/2025 22:35

Can we not derail with this.surely? There's enough threads on how awful they are elsewhere, why do we have to go into all of this on a thread about the monarchy and it's future

It is very tiresome

JoyousGreyOrca · 14/02/2025 22:36

Samcro · 14/02/2025 22:30

What a shame that a thread in the Royal family topic that is for once not about a certain couple has been derailed.

@JoyousGreyOrca hope you’re ok

Thank you! A bit shaken, but okay.

OP posts:
JoyousGreyOrca · 14/02/2025 22:37

Reetpetitenot · 14/02/2025 22:33

So why are Harry and Meghan continually acting more like royalty than the rf, with their pseudo tours and their 'charity' work, their insistence on the use iof titles? Being royal is all they have.

They are irrelevant to the question. Totally irrelevant.

OP posts:
Reetpetitenot · 14/02/2025 22:38

TulipTiptoer · 14/02/2025 22:35

Can we not derail with this.surely? There's enough threads on how awful they are elsewhere, why do we have to go into all of this on a thread about the monarchy and it's future

Take it up with JoyousGreyOrca

Reetpetitenot · 14/02/2025 22:39

JoyousGreyOrca · 14/02/2025 22:37

They are irrelevant to the question. Totally irrelevant.

I was responding to your own post........

derxa · 14/02/2025 22:40

TulipTiptoer · 14/02/2025 22:34

Who wants to get rid of that?

Have I missed something?

It's brilliant what was Princes Trust and is now Kings Trust

Well you want to get rid of the king.

TulipTiptoer · 14/02/2025 22:42

derxa · 14/02/2025 22:40

Well you want to get rid of the king.

For the tenth time (can't count, maybe more maybe less) I have not said that. in the next two or three generations there were still be a monarchy and I have never said that the king's Trust should be got rid of.
I hope I am clear on that for you

Why are you making things up?

JoyousGreyOrca · 14/02/2025 22:44

The Kings Trust can continue. It is a charity that raises its own money anyway.

OP posts:
BigWillyLittleTodger · 14/02/2025 22:50

CathyorClaire · 14/02/2025 20:47

It does make me laugh when you put names forward and republicans get so affronted at the very thought of someone they don’t like being President 😂 the cognitive dissonance!

Well you've suggested a dead bloke and an éminence grise as potential candidates. I have very little doubt there's a deeper pool to dip from.

Get your facts straight, I said if in the 1980’s we had a republic JS would have been a possibility as HOS, stop trying to twist my words. You want an elected head of state, you will get who you are given by the great British public and you will just have to deal with the fact that it could be some undesirable character who doesn’t fit your republican eutopia, whoever the public vote in should make you rejoice! even if it was Carrie Johnson it would be mission accomplished for you, it should make you very happy.

Reetpetitenot · 14/02/2025 22:51

JoyousGreyOrca · 14/02/2025 22:44

The Kings Trust can continue. It is a charity that raises its own money anyway.

That's very noble of you.

JoyousGreyOrca · 14/02/2025 22:57

Reetpetitenot · 14/02/2025 22:51

That's very noble of you.

No. But it is not legally tied to the institution of the Royal family in any way. It is an independent charity.

OP posts:
BigWillyLittleTodger · 14/02/2025 23:02

Have you responded to the question why your life is going to be better if the monarchy is abolished @JoyousGreyOrca or have I missed it?

Reetpetitenot · 14/02/2025 23:23

JoyousGreyOrca · 14/02/2025 22:57

No. But it is not legally tied to the institution of the Royal family in any way. It is an independent charity.

You're really, absolutely determined that the royal family are not involved in anything positive, aren't you.

dorathexplorer · 14/02/2025 23:52

It's an MN thread and they do tend to divert. Why would Harry not pop up like Andrew does in every thread? We're always being told Harry is part of the RF blah blah.

BemusedAmerican · 15/02/2025 00:18

It makes sense that much of the sovereign grant is being spent on crown properties. A previous thread mentioned that many properties were old and landmarks and nedd to be updated.

William spent millions of his pwn money to build supportive housing. If I were in his position, I would maximize my savings so that if my housing project worked, so would build more supportive housing. He may chose to do so in the future.

BemusedAmerican · 15/02/2025 00:21

I'm also wondering if older royals are refusing to delegate? Does anyone know if Charles really wants to hand over lots of responsibilities to William?

bitteroldseetrouts · 15/02/2025 00:49

BemusedAmerican · 15/02/2025 00:21

I'm also wondering if older royals are refusing to delegate? Does anyone know if Charles really wants to hand over lots of responsibilities to William?

This has occurred to me too. Charles has waited a long time to be king. He had huge shoes to fill and knows he could never hope to match the popularity of his mother, , but I imagine he would be determined to try to make his mark. I wonder if he wants to make the most of the job, and do everything he possibly can despite his cancer, and does not want to deputise William or anyone else if he can help it. He certainly seems to be enjoying himself. He's reputedly a workaholic and has always had numerous interests, so being as buy as he is is not out of character, cancer or no cancer.

Hopefully, Charles is also being a decent grandpa, and letting his son get on with having the relationship with his wife, and his grandchildren the close family upbringing, that he was not able to experience/give his own children. William and Catherine breaking the familial cycle of decades of awful/absent/neglectful parenting going back to the days of Queen Victoria and beyond is a good thing. On a purely human level, people resenting that determination and criticising them for it is quite sad.

derxa · 15/02/2025 04:21

JoyousGreyOrca · 14/02/2025 22:57

No. But it is not legally tied to the institution of the Royal family in any way. It is an independent charity.

🤣🤣🤣

Meltedcandlewax · 15/02/2025 07:08

I agree. William is going to be King until he dies most probably, no retirement. So why not make the most of being with his children whilst he can?

Bontonbonbon · 15/02/2025 07:14

The rabid Sussex fans like to beat the drum that William is unpopular because it helps them
comfort themselves that Harry would be a better king. Except William is always massively popular in polls and most people (who aren’t die hard republicans or shilling for MM) think he’ll be a better king than his father.

It doesn’t take a lot of brains to read and learn about the British constitution or read the history of the royal family. Perhaps some Republicans could try it so they stop making basic factual errors.

WatchOutMissMarpleIsAbout · 15/02/2025 07:53

JoyousGreyOrca · 14/02/2025 16:18

@PrettyFlyforaMaiTai Oh come on! No one would describe Camilla as glamorous.

How bloody rude and ageist.

I’ll go back to reading the rest of the thread but had to comment on this.

Sallyslider653 · 15/02/2025 07:56

wordler · 14/02/2025 21:56

They publish accounts every year, but not sure how long they stay on the website. If you click on the link I shared above that's the 23/24 document.

The money doesn't go back into a 'public pot' once released to the Sovereign Grant.

The basics are:

The Crown Estates generate an annual profit.
They hand over the profits to the government and then Charles is given back a percentage to cover the costs of running the official duties of the royal household. Currently, that percentage is 25% because of extra money needed to renovate Buckingham Palace. But before that it was 15%.

So 75%-85% of the money generated by the Crown Estates does go into the public pot and is spent by the government on our behalf.

The Sovereign Grant is the other 15-25%.

If the SG money is not completely spent any leftover is added to a reserve pot.
The reserve pot is capped at a specific figure. If the reserve pot is consistently 'overflowing' that gives the government the sign that the SG budget should be reconsidered and lowered.

That's the most simplistic view of it - it's a bit more complicated with which year is used to calculate the present year's profit etc. And there is a rule in place to guard against low profits from the estates gutting the SG budget which means that if profits have dropped unexpectedly (like in the Covid years) the SG is maintained at the level of the previous year and doesn't go down proportionately.

But it doesn't mean the SG can never be reduced. The oversight is mainly from the Prime Minister's office and the Chancellor of the Exchequer so they can overrule the monarch on budget needs if they want to.

Thank you very much for this very full explanation Wordler, I don’t think I have read as detailed a summary of it before!

It’s quite complicated isn’t it?!

So presumably the. Crown Estates that generate the profits are the Duchies? Is that correct?

And I suppose my next question is; how does the PM’s office and that of the C of the Exchequer know that the full profits are handed over initially? Who does the accounts? Are they independently verified?

And does the Sovereign Grant go to maintain Bagshot Park and Gatcombe Park and Prince William’s properties too?

In other words, are they used to maintain the properties that are privately owned , as well as the state owned ones too?

Thanks again.

WatchOutMissMarpleIsAbout · 15/02/2025 07:59

TulipTiptoer · 14/02/2025 17:26

Why is it always interpreted as 'hate' if there is any criticism of members of the Royal Family.

We are allowed to question them. I know those who are totally pro all members of the royal family dislike the criticism but I am sure we can accept others' points of view. Even if we don't agree.

I have said on here, I think William and Kate have a poor work record (before Kate's diagnosis) I appreciate there is young children in the mix, but it does not take two doing little. I especially think this of William given his father is 76 with ongoing cancer treatment. I don't know why he doesn't do more. That is not 'hate'.

I think this is maybe more to do with Kate’s underlying health condition.

I have one and the amount of times I suddenly couldn’t do the school run or pick up was probably at least once a week and dh would have to go into work late or work from home.

But I may also be projecting and just guessing. No one really knows.

Swipe left for the next trending thread