Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Prince Louis the photographer

414 replies

PrettyFlyforaMaiTai · 03/02/2025 16:22

Kensington Palace have released a photo of the Princess of Wales photographed by her youngest son, Prince Louis. It is to mark World Cancer Day, which is tomorrow.

How cute!

Prince Louis the photographer
Prince Louis the photographer
Prince Louis the photographer
OP posts:
TulipTiptoer · 06/02/2025 07:51

I think it's unfair to expect @Jacquette to be able to set out how a republic would work in a country that has had a monarchy for centuries. We all know it would take possibly decades to unravel by experts and scholars, and to expect a person on a forum to be able to set this out in a post, in a nutshell, for royalists or those in favour of a constitutional monarchy, to pick over and criticise is too much.
I won't say anymore but will comment on the thread missmarpel linked when I have time, rather than derail the thread

As for the photo which is the subject of the thread, well done Kate for feeling so positive in your cancer journey. I did find the photo a bit dark figuratively speaking.

Reetpetitenot · 06/02/2025 08:07

Surely if you want to overturn the monarchy in favour of a republic you should have at least some practical idea of how you would like it to work though. Just wanting something else because you don't agree with the status quo, fine, but you should probably have a clear idea of what the something else looks like otherwise you enter shitshow territory brexit, cough.

WatchOutMissMarpleIsAbout · 06/02/2025 08:13

@TulipTiptoer ive posted on it again as I think it’s an interesting debate to be had. So hopefully it’s bumped it up a bit.

Likewhatever · 06/02/2025 08:24

What I like about that photo is Catherine being bundled up in what look like dog walking clothes. She is unequivocally dressed for comfort and practicality and doesn’t give stuff how she looks. The photo is a bit dark and gloomy but there’s still exuberance there.

Thedom · 06/02/2025 13:27

I think someone who mentioned it has a bit of a WW11 vibe is spot on. it is a really interesting composition and quite the unique photo. Lovely that Prince Louis took it, if it was an unplanned photo by PL which came out looking so interesting I can see why she would want to use it.

We have a magnificent sunset photo, which my then 10 year old took by pure chance, it was just one of those impromptu 'let me take a photo, let me take a photo' moments and everything just hit the right spot.

oakleaffy · 06/02/2025 14:07

Thedom · 06/02/2025 13:27

I think someone who mentioned it has a bit of a WW11 vibe is spot on. it is a really interesting composition and quite the unique photo. Lovely that Prince Louis took it, if it was an unplanned photo by PL which came out looking so interesting I can see why she would want to use it.

We have a magnificent sunset photo, which my then 10 year old took by pure chance, it was just one of those impromptu 'let me take a photo, let me take a photo' moments and everything just hit the right spot.

I'm glad you too can see the WW1 vibe- definitely like a War vibe, deep in the forest - it's a little eerie {I have seen lots of WW1 photos so perhaps this is what triggered the memory}

https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/205024548

THE BRITISH EXPEDITIONARY FORCE ON THE WESTERN FRONT, 1914-1915

Colonel Philip R. Robertson, commanding officer of the 1st Battalion, Cameronians (Scottish Rifles) returning from a tour of his unit's positions in waterlogged trenches at Bois Grenier in January 1915.

https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/205024548

winfongdown · 06/02/2025 16:59

What the 😂

Jacquette · 06/02/2025 20:15

bitteroldseetrouts · 05/02/2025 22:37

There was nothing shitty about my post @Jacquette , and you should apologise for that remark. If you can't cope with robust - but really basic - questioning about a proposed massive change in the make up of this country's governance , then don't come onto these threads extolling the virtues of a republic you can't describe. I'm sorry you don't have any answers to perfectly reasonable questions about what we are being sold as a better form of government. I am sorry you can't provide civilised answers that counteract the endless remarks about forelock tugging and billionaires in tiaras leeching off the taxpayer. Unfortunately, this lack of clarity or an attractive alternative message is why I don't think the republic is going to happen any time soon.

First off, at no point did I ‘extoll virtues of a republic.’ ( your words. )

I gave an example of another type of republic and then I I made the observation that posters here seem to be focusing on the American form of republic. and that there are other models. That was all what my post said.

I don’t owe you an apology for calling your post a shitty one. It was a shitty post.

If anyone owes anybody an apology it’s you for incorrectly stating I came onto this forum ‘extolling the virtues of a republic’ because I didn’t. Have another look.

bitteroldseetrouts · 06/02/2025 20:38

I thought you were leaving the conversation @Jacquette . No, I won't be apologising to you.

Jacquette · 06/02/2025 20:49

mainecooncatonahottinroof · 05/02/2025 21:36

Then why keep bringing it up?!

I didn’t. Another photo said something along the lines of it not being photoshopped.

winfongdown · 06/02/2025 21:10

Same old, same old ...

mainecooncatonahottinroof · 06/02/2025 21:22

Jacquette · 06/02/2025 20:49

I didn’t. Another photo said something along the lines of it not being photoshopped.

Right.

mathanxiety · 06/02/2025 22:43

CoffeeCantata · 06/02/2025 07:50

Just one more post off-topic and then I will try to leave the subject alone.

The problem would be: how do we choose a President? If by popular vote, we run the risk of getting a dangerous maverick/extremist/demagogue type like Trump or Farage or possibly worse. After Trump's success, and Brexit, I'm afraid I don't trust the electorate in the way you're theoretically supposed to any more. Call me elitist!

If the President was chosen by the government I don't see how they could not be politically biased? And how else would they be chosen?

If they're somehow meant to put themselves forward then It's the old objection of 'those who seek power are sometimes the least suitable to hold it'. But any President would inevitably be a far more divisive figure than members of the RF, particularly if an election was involved. The only sort of President I would like would be a very boring, serious and highly-regarded judge or academic and they would be unlikely to want the job or to garner popular support.

But for me the biggest argument against making this fundamental change is...it's just unnecessary and would be highly de-stablising at a dangerous and insecure point in our, and world, history. So what if KC has a few nice castles and palaces? I honestly couldn't give a monkey's! Good for him, and I wouldn't swap my life with his for all the tea in China.

I'll try to leave it there, with apologies. But threads are organic things and sometimes they go off on quite reasonable tangents...

Your next door neighbours to the west have a parliamentary system of government with a popularly elected president.

There's no need to reinvent the wheel or for constitutional scholars to turn themselves inside out trying to understand how it could be done.

There is also the example of the Glorious Revolution, when William and Mary were in effect invited and then elected by Parliament to be constitutional monarchs.

In Ireland the popularly elected president has an appointed council of state to advise him or her and examines bills before signing them into law. The president (usually acting with the agreement of the council of state) and on behalf of the people can refer a bill to the Supreme Court if he or she feels there's a constitutional issue that needs examination. Money bills cannot be referred, nor can bills changing the constitution once passed by the Dail. The president can refuse to dissolve the Dail (parliament) when the Taoiseach (PM) has lost a majority/ vote of no confidence.

The president represents Ireland abroad for official visits and welcomes other heads of state. The essence of the role is that the president acts on behalf of the people vis a vis the government at home, and represents them internationally as a figurehead.

The current incumbent, Michael D. Higgins, was a political fixture for decades (Labour Party). He is a poet and booster of Irish literature and the arts and the Irish language, currently in the last year of his second and final seven year term. A presidential election will be held no later than October of this year.

People who put themselves forward for election as president usually have some party political background, but it's not necessarily always the case. To secure a nomination as candidate, an individual must be nominated by at least 20 members of Dail Eireann (the parliament) or four administrative counties or county boroughs. A sitting president can nominate him or herself to run again. Previous presidents include academic /constitutional lawyer from NI Mary McAleese, human rights campaigner Mary Robinson, and various pols.

Presidents tend to be exceptionally judicious in the exercise of their powers.

MrsFinkelstein · 07/02/2025 09:17

@mathanxiety
"Presidents tend to be exceptionally judicious in the exercise of their powers"

Except our neighbours to the west have a currently elected President who has done nothing but insert himself into politically injudicious situations, as well as being blatantly antisemitic.

But the white haired, dog owning grandpa seems to fool a fair number of people.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread