Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Harry v. NGN

1000 replies

Atlasvue · 19/01/2025 10:02

Starting a thread for Tuesday.
This BBC article covers the basics. This is the last line ….
Tuesday really is the beginning of the end. And someone is going to lose - and lose big.

I have a feeling, that Harry won’t win but he just wants to use the public setting to air his grievances. A therapy session would have worked out much cheaper.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c2l00xkgwnyo

Prince Harry leaves the court during his hacking case against the Daily Mirror. He wears a dark coloured suit, white shirt and tie. His barrister David Sherborne, also dressed in a dark suit is on his left.  A crowd of photographers are behind a metal...

Prince Harry versus newspapers: This is the one that matters

Prince Harry’s legal battle against British tabloids for allegedly unlawfully intruding into his life reaches its most important moment on Tuesday.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c2l00xkgwnyo

OP posts:
Thread gallery
25
JoyousGreyOrca · 22/01/2025 17:02

@Serenster it was primarily because of Milly and the public outrage. Others campaigning and complaining all helped bring it about. Williams considerable power helped. But it would have happened anyway.

JoyousGreyOrca · 22/01/2025 17:03

Janiie · 22/01/2025 17:01

He settled! He did not win anything.

Sure another pedant.
An eight figure settlement and a wide ranging public apology is not a win apparently.

Puzzledandpissedoff · 22/01/2025 17:04

GiveMeSpanakopita · 22/01/2025 16:54

CBS! CBS were crazy man they bought the close ups of Diana's head injury from the Parisian agency and were shopping them around, showed them several times on their network even as late as 2014. There wasn't a lot the RF could do legally of course. But, yes, I was flabbergasted that Harry then was comfortable giving them an interview about suicides in young people.

I wouldn't say I was "flabbergasted" at Harry giving CBS the exclusive, @GiveMeSpanakopita; disappointed perhaps, but hardly surprised

As we've seen so often (and again today) Harry's principles are easily shoved aside if the money's right, and while few would blame him for not wanting to risk bankruptcy it's the prior grandstanding which rankles

IcedPurple · 22/01/2025 17:07

Lawyers haggle over settlements for days so that either side can spin them as a 'win'. This is no different.

Harry got a substantial pay out, though just how substantial will probably never be known despite some posters claiming otherwise on the basis of media rumours. However, we can assume it was a pretty hefty sum. He also won a profuse public apology which he and his supporters will claim as vindication.

NGN avoided a potentially damaging court case and admitted no liability. In relative terms, and given that they're already believed to have paid out £1 billion in similar cases, the money will not be a huge loss to them.

So I'd say there's no real 'loser' or 'winner' here. But it could all likely have been achieved months ago, and Harry's claim that this was all about 'accountability' has been exposed as hollow.

MummyJ12 · 22/01/2025 17:07

JoyousGreyOrca · 22/01/2025 16:54

Ah yes CBS did show a Photo of Diana in the car in a documentary. The Palace and the Spencers formally complained and a public apology was made.

Oh so you know all about it now!

JoyousGreyOrca · 22/01/2025 17:07

Just double checked and my memory is right. Clive Goodman and the enquiry was far more about Charles and Diana.

JoyousGreyOrca · 22/01/2025 17:09

MummyJ12 · 22/01/2025 17:07

Oh so you know all about it now!

I thought your original comment was about video footage and I did not remember any network showing that.

No need for the snark because I asked which network you were talking about.

Baital · 22/01/2025 17:10

He didn't 'win' or 'lose'. He compromised and settled. Perfectly reasonable behaviour, and completely in line with civil justice, which is about putting a financial value on civil wrongdoing.

No additional admissions by the Murdoch press, but a large enough (whatever that means) sum.of money for Harry to feel vindicated.

But a little at odds with his earlier rhetoric, which is what posters here are pointing out.

Serenster · 22/01/2025 17:12

JoyousGreyOrca · 22/01/2025 17:02

@Serenster it was primarily because of Milly and the public outrage. Others campaigning and complaining all helped bring it about. Williams considerable power helped. But it would have happened anyway.

I mean, pick that up with Lord Leveson, not me, he’s the one who expressly said it was also a cause of the enquiry…

JoyousGreyOrca · 22/01/2025 17:13

@Serenster He said it was primarily because of the public outrage over Milly.

Janiie · 22/01/2025 17:14

'He compromised and settled. Perfectly reasonable behaviour, and completely in line with civil justice, which is about putting a financial value on civil wrongdoing.'

Yes but he always said he wouldnt ever settle. He always said it was about accountability not money. The apology wasn't anything he hadn't heard already. Nothing new was revealed at all.

Sunholidays · 22/01/2025 17:15

JoyousGreyOrca · 22/01/2025 17:03

Sure another pedant.
An eight figure settlement and a wide ranging public apology is not a win apparently.

Exactly. William also won when he settled with Murdoch re. the phone hacking. He also got an eight figure settlement and made good use of it.

Serenster · 22/01/2025 17:17

“This Inquiry was ultimately directed because of the wide scale public revulsion at [Milly Dowler]… Having said that, however, there was also increasing public concern about [Operation Caryatid] - Prince Willian’s allegations”

It says what it says. People can read it for themselves.

Janiie · 22/01/2025 17:17

JoyousGreyOrca · 22/01/2025 17:15

"Prince Harry has secured a significant legal victory, as Rupert Murdoch’s News Group Newspapers (NGN) issued a historic apology and agreed to pay substantial damages to settle his lawsuit. The case, which centered on unlawful activities by journalists and private investigators, marked a critical moment in Harry's ongoing battle to expose the invasive tactics of the British press."

Read more at:
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/global-trends/how-prince-harry-won-his-case-against-murdochs-news-group-and-what-it-means-for-the-media/articleshow/117459292.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst

That is bizarre reporting isn't it. Won his case? He settled! Confused

JoyousGreyOrca · 22/01/2025 17:18

Sunholidays · 22/01/2025 17:15

Exactly. William also won when he settled with Murdoch re. the phone hacking. He also got an eight figure settlement and made good use of it.

Can you provide a link to this? Everything I have read says he got a very large sum, but there is no hint of how much.

MummyJ12 · 22/01/2025 17:19

GiveMeSpanakopita · 22/01/2025 16:54

CBS! CBS were crazy man they bought the close ups of Diana's head injury from the Parisian agency and were shopping them around, showed them several times on their network even as late as 2014. There wasn't a lot the RF could do legally of course. But, yes, I was flabbergasted that Harry then was comfortable giving them an interview about suicides in young people.

Absolutely. I completely agree.
As usual though, it’s whatever suits and is convenient for Harry.

JoyousGreyOrca · 22/01/2025 17:19

Serenster · 22/01/2025 17:17

“This Inquiry was ultimately directed because of the wide scale public revulsion at [Milly Dowler]… Having said that, however, there was also increasing public concern about [Operation Caryatid] - Prince Willian’s allegations”

It says what it says. People can read it for themselves.

Yes it was primarily because of Milly. There was public unhappiness about other hacking such as hacking of communications between Charles and Diana.

JoyousGreyOrca · 22/01/2025 17:20

Co-claimant Lord Tom Watson paid tribute to Prince Harry's tenacity in pursuing this case for so long, praising his "bravery and astonishing courage".
Good man.

RoundandRounnnd · 22/01/2025 17:21

Well done, Harry 👏👏👏

IcedPurple · 22/01/2025 17:21

Baital · 22/01/2025 17:10

He didn't 'win' or 'lose'. He compromised and settled. Perfectly reasonable behaviour, and completely in line with civil justice, which is about putting a financial value on civil wrongdoing.

No additional admissions by the Murdoch press, but a large enough (whatever that means) sum.of money for Harry to feel vindicated.

But a little at odds with his earlier rhetoric, which is what posters here are pointing out.

Exactly this.

The settlement is quite similar to several previous settlements. It's a compromise, with each side getting some of what they wanted while conceding other points. That's what out of court mediation is designed to achieve.

If Harry hadn't put on his grandiose 'dragon slaying' act, nobody would have much to say about this settlement. But if you're going to grandstand about 'accountability' be prepared to be called out on it. That's what accountability is all about!

Janiie · 22/01/2025 17:22

JoyousGreyOrca · 22/01/2025 17:20

Co-claimant Lord Tom Watson paid tribute to Prince Harry's tenacity in pursuing this case for so long, praising his "bravery and astonishing courage".
Good man.

Bravery and astonishing courage? What the same man who has made a career out of gossiping about his family for years revealing highly personal and private details? Brave no, astonishing maybe.

Sunholidays · 22/01/2025 17:22

JoyousGreyOrca · 22/01/2025 17:18

Can you provide a link to this? Everything I have read says he got a very large sum, but there is no hint of how much.

I think Harry gave this info in his book. I haven't got it at hand, sorry.

JoyousGreyOrca · 22/01/2025 17:24

In 2012, Murdoch's British newspaper group issued an unreserved apology for widespread hacking carried out by journalists at the News of the World, which the media mogul had been forced to shut down amid a backlash, although it still rejects any allegations of wrongdoing at the Sun.
During a criminal trial brought against News of the World journalists and others in 2014, its former royal editor Clive Goodman said in the mid-2000s he had hacked the voicemails of Harry and William, and those of William’s wife, Kate.
Her phone was hacked 155 times, William’s 35 and Harry’s nine times, Goodman said.

NGN had settled William's claim "for a huge sum of money in 2020... without any of the public being told, and seemingly with some favourable deal in return for him going ‘quietly’ so to speak".

https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/prince-harry-takes-murdochs-uk-group-latest-court-action-against-papers-2023-04-24/

JoyousGreyOrca · 22/01/2025 17:25

Sunholidays · 22/01/2025 17:22

I think Harry gave this info in his book. I haven't got it at hand, sorry.

He did not. He said a large sum was paid to William. The amount or even a hint of the amount has never been revealed by Harry or anyone else.

We do not know if Harrys settlement was larger than Williams or not, as we do not know how much William got.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread