Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

With Love, Meghan - criticisms and genuine concern for her mental health

1000 replies

Lavenderfarmcottage · 05/01/2025 16:34

I am probably going to be flogged for posting this and chased down the dark laneways of Mumsnet as bystanders yell “Shame Shame Shame”.

I weighed in yesterday about a thread on Meghan and her new Netflix show. I made some criticisms about the trailer and certain cliche’s in the way it was produced. Hypocritical of me to be posting this but I feel guilty and have reflected. I am actually looking forward to watching it on Netflix and my criticisms were pretty minor and not exclusive to her show - it’s a common issue I have.

Meghan has struggled with mental health because of criticism. The reaction to ‘With Love… Meghan’ has been fairly brutal.

I think it would be really good if we refrained from saying anything negative about the series or Meghan Markle. That’s not the point of this thread.

I want to know if you think the criticisms have gone too far. The Princess of Wales is not on the scene and we are protective of her rightly so. That leaves Meghan as media fodder though.

Do you think it’s time Meghan and Harry were given a break ? I do. I think we’ve been far too harsh and the criticisms have gotten out of hand.

I think we also forget the cultural relevance. If we went into the homes or Gwyneth, Julia Roberts etc and I would probably feel the divide too. American culture doesn’t apologise for wealth and hollywoood is highly competitive.

Having a confident demeanour, throwing your head back Julia Roberts style when you laugh and unapologetically selling $$$ vagina products like Gwyneth Paltrow is how it over there. People talk loudly and confidently and are polished and rehearsed especially in the
Competitive world of Hollywood…

Are we all being too hard ?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
mainecooncatonahottinroof · 05/01/2025 17:47

RockingLock · 05/01/2025 17:22

Every time i read one of these threads i can’t help but think about the amount of people on MN who have directly met H&M and been screwed over by them, so determined they are that they are X or Y, and forgetting they have no idea what the truth is from either side. The media at its best.

let’s not forget the bollocks we were fed during covid by the same outlets eh.

the strong feelings about something and someone you don’t even know and doesn’t directly affect you just amazes me.

couldn’t give a fuck.

I may watch the show, I may not. I may enjoy it, I may not. My opinion on H&M? Neutral, BECAUSE I DONT KNOW THEM AND NOTHING THEY DO AFFECTS ME OR MY FAMILY.

So you haven't seen any of the interviews, read Spare and all the other bullshit they've come out with?

I think we have a pretty good idea of the people they are, direct from the horse's mouth.

PrettyFlyforaMaiTai · 05/01/2025 17:47

Unfortunately that is the risk of putting yourself in the limelight. I was more reserved about passing judgement on her when she was a royal as she didn’t ask to be put in that position. She fell in love with someone who happened to be a Prince.

But now she has left the family and chosen to carve her own path in the public limelight, I think we are allowed to criticise her as much as we should be allowed to praise her. She has chosen to do these projects and if they aren’t successful, we have the right to point that out. She also chose (along with Harry) to criticise the ‘Firm’ and spill family secrets and private conversations. Therefore, I find it fair that if she does something ridiculous (take her The Cut interview, for example, where she was OTT performing for the journalist but the journalist saw this) then we should be allowed to call her out and criticise her for it.

youareonlyhereonce · 05/01/2025 17:47

I am no fan of the woman - but the amount of hate she gets - I really don't know how she copes.

LouisvilleSlugger · 05/01/2025 17:48

I do think Meghan gets more than her fair share of criticism. Most of it is just spiteful.

Kate seems to get virtually no scorn. Having a health issue has obviously helped in this regard.

Anyway, I don’t really care about any of them. But I’m a sucker for a lifestyle type show in a nice house. I’ll watch Meghan’s show but I think so many will watch it having decided in advance they’ll hate it and relish in slagging it off.

Optigan · 05/01/2025 17:48

Choccyscofffy · 05/01/2025 17:34

Does that apply to Catherine?

Yes, it would - Catherine knew full well what she was marrying into.

Adamante · 05/01/2025 17:48

And the '2 bedroom cottage' you speak of was a Sir Christopher Wren designed building on the grounds of an actual royal palace, in one of the most exclusive areas of London. And she was getting it for free.

Indeed. 2 bedroom Flats, not even houses with two bedrooms average out at around £6/7k a month, in Kensington & Chelsea, especially that close to Hyde Park & Knightsbridge.

Poor old Meghan & Harry stuck in that dump Sad

mainecooncatonahottinroof · 05/01/2025 17:49

Choccyscofffy · 05/01/2025 17:34

Does that apply to Catherine?

Catherine is carrying out royal duties in the public eye. Meghan is not.

However, Catherine has her fair share of critics. Didn't you see all the bullshit before she announced her cancer diagnosis, or do you only stick up for Meghan??

Mumtobabyhavoc · 05/01/2025 17:49

mainecooncatonahottinroof · 05/01/2025 17:39

She hasn't shown much business sense to date!

How can you justify that comment?
Lives in a mansion, has another show...
Not on the breadline.

RandomButtons · 05/01/2025 17:49

Choccyscofffy · 05/01/2025 17:45

Catherine absolutely has put herself in the public eye.

This saint Catherine and sinful Meghan schtick is so tiresome.

Never called either of them saint or sinner, I’m very ambivalent to both of them, not a fan of Catherine to be honest. However Megan constantly puts herself in the public eye by making series.

I just watched the trailer, and I don’t see what the fuss is about tbh. It’s pretty sugar sweet American Happy Happy Smiley bit of nothing much. I’m sure people who want a feel good filler will enjoy it. Bit like is it cake but for adults.

MangshorJhol · 05/01/2025 17:49

And yes Catherine did know what she was signing herself up for. For a very specific role. And has dealt with horrendous media coverage including the ABSURD stuff when she was out of the public eye. On MN there were people suggesting that William had beaten her up, that she was holding the kids hostage till a divorce was negotiated. It was open season! I am not saying it was right, but again, a LOT of posters suggested that since she was in the RF subsidised by the public 'we' had a right to know about her medical history.

The total amnesia about the wild wild speculation is very bizarre and quite intriguing.

IcedPurple · 05/01/2025 17:51

Lavenderfarmcottage · 05/01/2025 16:46

I don’t think I’d want to be out of the spotlight in her shoes or his. Meghan took enormous risks choosing Hollywood over a safe life path. She eventually found fame and built a fairly solid career. She gave that up for a family that expected her to be a supporting act for very little pay or benefit in the context of a) their wealth and b) her capacity to earn otherwise.
Why would she want to give up on a career and her previous dreams given up for the 🤴

Harry has never had anonymity and could never have a normal life. He was never going to retire in Nantucket and catch clams off a boat or get a job at Walmart. They needed something to do with their lives and its fairly impossible to ever hide.

Harry has never had anonymity and could never have a normal life. He was never going to retire in Nantucket and catch clams off a boat or get a job at Walmart. They needed something to do with their lives and its fairly impossible to ever hide.

I've seen a lot of comments like this on similar threads.

That Harry and Meghan are uniquely famous and always will be. I disagree. In California, they are living among many people far richer and more famous than them. I suspect most under 40s, certainly in America but increasingly in Britain too, have little idea who they are. As time goes on, and as their, especially Meghan's, links to the royal family fade, so too will interest in them.

Lots of famous people manage to live fairly anonymously. They could too if they wanted. But they actively choose to put themselves out there for public consumption, and in doing so can't expect that they only receive a positive reception.

Choccyscofffy · 05/01/2025 17:51

MangshorJhol · 05/01/2025 17:47

@Choccyscofffy Sure but those opportunities (which are not that easy to come by- how many chefs have solo shows on Netflix?) should go to chefs no? If they are not chefs and then produce stuff that is risible then it's okay to laugh right?
Let's say in a 7-8 years Prince George gets a wildcard at Wimbledon when he's a mediocre tennis player, depriving someone of a place and then loses miserably. People will be critical and up in arms right? No one will say, ah but there's a 128 places and it's a tournament that happens every year, Wimbledon knows that he'll draw people in, and come on, poor kid, let's not slate him. In fact there would be absolute outrage. Rightly!

Playing at Wimbledon is very different to a cookery show.

If shows were awarded based on skill alone, the Kardashians would never have got a show,

We can’t say who Netflix should give opportunities to, they’re in the business of making money, not nurturing ingenues.

mainecooncatonahottinroof · 05/01/2025 17:52

Mumtobabyhavoc · 05/01/2025 17:35

Bashing them is a sport, isn't it?

I think, "More power to them." I read Happy had a win in court against a tab for breaking into his messages. That's great!
Meghan isn't an elected official so I have no idea why Megan Mcain levied such brutal criticism to her over tbe show calling it, tone deaf and saying she should try to help people.
I think it's fairly bizarre to criticize them so much.
They seem lovely, do a lot for charity and deserve to have whatever life they want. They work for it after all.

An hour a week, I believe?? 😂

murasaki · 05/01/2025 17:52

To be fair to her, she seems to be able to open a jar of shit jam, something I personally struggle with.

User776532 · 05/01/2025 17:52

Narcissists do not suffer from poor mental health. They adore attention, no matter what type. Grandiose thinking makes them spin any criticism into something that has nothing to do with any of their flaws. They will blame it on the person, society, racism or whatever. In the end, they don't see their failures as true failures but simply the fault of someone else.

diamondpony80 · 05/01/2025 17:52

I don't think it's a cultural thing. She married her way to (what she thought would be) the top rather than working her way to the top, and she lacks the kind of experience and charisma that is required to make it on her own.

Trying to brand herself as an expert in something, purely because of her association with the royal family but without putting in the hard work along the way was always going to set her up for failure. It didn't work well for Brooklyn Beckham either.

What's going on in her personal life with her family doesn't paint her in a great light either. Ditching her father and other family members (and friends too) doesn't endear her to the public. Not saying it's necessarily wrong to do this - I know there are so many reasons someone might go no contact with family members and we'll probably never know the full story. It just makes people sceptical of her motives.

And of course there's Harry's treatment of his own family. I don't think anyone will ever really see them in a positive light after how they behaved. I'm not a royalist at all, but I liked the queen and a guy who could treat his father and grandmother like he did is always going to be unlikeable.

I think they will have a very difficult time achieving the kind of success and popularity they crave. They're not short of resources and could live a very comfortable life with their kids but it doesn't seem to be enough.

youareonlyhereonce · 05/01/2025 17:52

Ellaelle · 05/01/2025 17:36

What astounds me is I'm a big fan of princess Meghan, however, had it not been for the twenty 11 articles dm had on her (obsessed much) I would never had known she had a cookery TV show lol lol. Now I'm going to watch it definitely, I wouldn't have known about it but for the bombardment from the dm! Now im a fan as i said before, however, her detractors seem to be her biggest fans. All this "hate watching" is going to send viewing figures through the roof!!!!!!

She is not a princess. She come's across as a little desperate now - cosplaying Emma Thynn, Marchioness of Bath in her latest show.

RockingLock · 05/01/2025 17:53

Nordione1 · 05/01/2025 17:35

Oh come now. How can you resist finding out how to make a basic sponge cake from a world renowned chef? I think you are a secret fangirl really...you're just being stubborn. Team Meghan or Team Kate?? Got to be one or the other it's the rule!

😂 really? This isn’t twilight and I’m not 13 years old. I am team neither. Not sure how you’d choose?!

mainecooncatonahottinroof · 05/01/2025 17:53

Ellaelle · 05/01/2025 17:36

What astounds me is I'm a big fan of princess Meghan, however, had it not been for the twenty 11 articles dm had on her (obsessed much) I would never had known she had a cookery TV show lol lol. Now I'm going to watch it definitely, I wouldn't have known about it but for the bombardment from the dm! Now im a fan as i said before, however, her detractors seem to be her biggest fans. All this "hate watching" is going to send viewing figures through the roof!!!!!!

Well if you are such a big fan, you'd surely know that she is not "princess Meghan" for a start! 😁

mainecooncatonahottinroof · 05/01/2025 17:54

IcedPurple · 05/01/2025 17:35

But the reasons she is famous are personal.

She has no background in cooking. She was a fairly minor actress. She is known because she married the 5th in line to the British throne, left her role after about 5 minutes and proceeded to slag off the family that made her globally famous. Now she's selling a show called 'With Love, Meghan', that purports to show some sort of insight into her life, even though it's filmed in a rented property. She is not a cook of any sort, so she's basically selling herself. So of course the criticisms will be personal.

Well her partner before Harry was a chef?? 😁

pelargoniums · 05/01/2025 17:54

I don’t think she should be above criticism nor should she receive the level or criticism she gets.

What annoys me is that on any Meghan thread, it devolves into the same critiques: so on the “Meghan back on Instagram” thread instead of critiquing that she launched without her blue tick, with the wrong royal title in her bio, and posted the show trailer twice because she mucked it up initially, it once again revolved around the same few unhinged Meghan haters shrieking “bUt ShE tOuChEd HeR bUmP” then ironically accusing anyone defending her of working as a cabal to gaslight them.

I’d love a Meghan-neutral space to discuss stuff, much as Reddit has different Meghan boards for the fanatics, the neutrals and the fucking lunatics those who aren’t keen. Because I guarantee this thread is just going to be 40 pages of mudslinging and anyone who says anything other than slagging her off will be accused of being Sussex Squad, even if you don’t know what that even is. (I like to imagine it as a bit like the Spice Girls fan club and you get a membership card and special edition CD singles.)

Nordione1 · 05/01/2025 17:54

Choccyscofffy · 05/01/2025 17:19

If you misappropriate minority culture expect to be pulled up in it.

So 2021 of you! Topical too considering there is discussion of a blasphemy law in Parliament. Always good to monitor other people's language and perhaps report anything inappropriate.

Amituofo, choccy

pinkroses79 · 05/01/2025 17:54

Her show deserves to be critiqued in the same way any show is critiqued.
I haven't see the trailer or anything, but I am assuming it is going to be uninteresting and not very authentic, simply because they seem to be jumping from one thing to another trying to get lucky with success, rather than actually having real expertise in anything. If people don't want to watch, it will be because she doesn't have anything to say that people want to listen to. That's the same for everyone and many people get rejections and poor reviews which may affect their mental health.

murasaki · 05/01/2025 17:55

youareonlyhereonce · 05/01/2025 17:52

She is not a princess. She come's across as a little desperate now - cosplaying Emma Thynn, Marchioness of Bath in her latest show.

Emma Thynn seems lovely, she did well (and was booted out too early i felt) on celebrity Masterchef, and was nice on Strictly. She seems a top lass you could have a grand night out with. Meghan, not so much.

mainecooncatonahottinroof · 05/01/2025 17:55

SerafinasGoose · 05/01/2025 17:40

I've hidden those interminably repetitive royal boards. They're like a particularly tedious timewarp.

Fair enough when important issues come up: like the recent thread on AIBU querying precisely why the King and his petulant elder son are able to fleece the country and the NHS and all the while keep their finances opaque thanks to their exemption from the FOI act. Those issues affect everyone, are newsworthy, and are perhaps worthy of discussion.

Petty gossip about Meghan Markle's mental health and the minutiae of her daily doings is the reason the other board is there. And is the reason some of us stay well away from it.

💤

Edited

Yet you felt moved to comment on this thread...

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.