Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

With Love, Meghan - criticisms and genuine concern for her mental health

1000 replies

Lavenderfarmcottage · 05/01/2025 16:34

I am probably going to be flogged for posting this and chased down the dark laneways of Mumsnet as bystanders yell “Shame Shame Shame”.

I weighed in yesterday about a thread on Meghan and her new Netflix show. I made some criticisms about the trailer and certain cliche’s in the way it was produced. Hypocritical of me to be posting this but I feel guilty and have reflected. I am actually looking forward to watching it on Netflix and my criticisms were pretty minor and not exclusive to her show - it’s a common issue I have.

Meghan has struggled with mental health because of criticism. The reaction to ‘With Love… Meghan’ has been fairly brutal.

I think it would be really good if we refrained from saying anything negative about the series or Meghan Markle. That’s not the point of this thread.

I want to know if you think the criticisms have gone too far. The Princess of Wales is not on the scene and we are protective of her rightly so. That leaves Meghan as media fodder though.

Do you think it’s time Meghan and Harry were given a break ? I do. I think we’ve been far too harsh and the criticisms have gotten out of hand.

I think we also forget the cultural relevance. If we went into the homes or Gwyneth, Julia Roberts etc and I would probably feel the divide too. American culture doesn’t apologise for wealth and hollywoood is highly competitive.

Having a confident demeanour, throwing your head back Julia Roberts style when you laugh and unapologetically selling $$$ vagina products like Gwyneth Paltrow is how it over there. People talk loudly and confidently and are polished and rehearsed especially in the
Competitive world of Hollywood…

Are we all being too hard ?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
Baital · 06/01/2025 18:51

I think it's widely known that the queen's family nickname was Lilibet?

Edited for spelling

jeffgoldblum · 06/01/2025 18:53

Prince Philip also called her 'cabbage' affectionately!
Luckily that wasn't chosen.

mainecooncatonahottinroof · 06/01/2025 18:53

RockingLock · 06/01/2025 15:41

@CoffeeCantata you know me now too? You’re literally spinning a narrative out of nothing.

you DONT know her. You’re going based off of one video and negative media (I googled her new show and there’s nothing positive, because the media still haven’t learnt from the multiple suicides they’ve caused by ripping someone apart repeatedly). I’m not watching it because it’s a waste of my time. I don’t really care to have an opinion of Meghan, negative or positive because it doesn’t affect my life, I have a real one thanks; and because if I come back with anything other than support for the hate you’re spewing you’ll just discount it, wasting your time too. You want to believe what you want to believe. But sure, I have an illusion. I think I’ve made it clear I’m neither a Sussex support nor am I a H&M hater but hey, you KNOW people because you have evidence based on what they directly say, right?!

Well lord only knows you might as well, after all the time you've wasted here, arguing with all and sundry about someone you claim to not want to know anything about!

Choccyscofffy · 06/01/2025 18:55

Jumborollers · 06/01/2025 18:49

Ah ok, so the Queen's nickname was somewhat known to a few.
And George's nickname was known to a very few.
So these two names were absolutely the only ones for their kids, obviously, considering the circumstances. Not awkward at all.

The point is we don’t know Archie is George’s nickname.

It makes no sense, Archie is not a contraction of George, it”s short for Archibald.

George was probably joking, the kids have a mischievous sense of humour.

mainecooncatonahottinroof · 06/01/2025 18:55

RockingLock · 06/01/2025 16:17

I honestly can’t be arsed with this any more, I just don’t care enough.

I actually laughed when I read this.

Ohpleeeease · 06/01/2025 18:56

Rhaidimiddim · 06/01/2025 16:30

I completely agree!

But today's sugar script is that racism is driving the negativity. Hence so many posters here also pushing the racism argument that M and the BRF didn't gel just because racism.

Newsweek's Jack Royston is blaming the negativity about the Netflix trailer on misogynoir.

It’s an agenda some are only too keen to latch onto. The irony is, MM does not thank them for it.

Choccyscofffy · 06/01/2025 18:56

jeffgoldblum · 06/01/2025 18:53

Prince Philip also called her 'cabbage' affectionately!
Luckily that wasn't chosen.

The old fart 🤣

Jumborollers · 06/01/2025 18:56

Baital · 06/01/2025 18:51

I think it's widely known that the queen's family nickname was Lilibet?

Edited for spelling

Edited

It certainly is now 😂
As I said, shame no other names were right.

Choccyscofffy · 06/01/2025 18:58

Baital · 06/01/2025 18:51

I think it's widely known that the queen's family nickname was Lilibet?

Edited for spelling

Edited

Yep. But according to Jumborollers it was a closely guarded secret.

Ellaelle · 06/01/2025 18:59

Choccyscofffy · 06/01/2025 18:44

I’ve just seen the video and whilst it looks a bit disorganised, Meghan doesn’t ‘absolutely ignore’ the woman. The woman has 90% of Meghan’s attention.

Meghan was pregnant sitting on the floor surrounded by mothers and some absolutely adorable babies, it’s natural that her attention was going to drift to the babies.

I agree that the set up should have been discussed in advance. Meghan sitting on the floor talking to a woman in a chair was never going to be natural. It would have been better to have Meghan and the lady sitting together. Maybe she was told she was going to have playtime with some mothers and babies.

There is sometimes awkwardness at these types of events but looks like mothers2mothers were happy with the event and there were sweet moments like this:

Thanks for the info and I've never seen that photo before she looks lovely.

mainecooncatonahottinroof · 06/01/2025 19:04

Ellaelle · 06/01/2025 17:57

Ooopsy 1 "s" too many should be mosey 🤭on down what's the problem with Wikipedia?

I bet you had a mosey and looked for your self and saw that Wikipedia says she IS a princess, so now you're moving the goal posts

Nah, didn't need to. I know she isn't called Princess Meghan without having to look it up anywhere. I can also spell. Not a goal post in sight - I have no idea what you're talking about! It's garbage!

mainecooncatonahottinroof · 06/01/2025 19:10

Ellaelle · 06/01/2025 18:08

OK bottom line is she's princess of the United Kingdom

According to Wikipedia-
(Meghan became a princess of the United Kingdom upon her marriage to Prince Harry, entitled to the style of Royal Highness.[356])

so I call her princess Meghan, everyone knows to whom I'm referring, I can't keep all the royal titles in my head, providing it's not derogatory I'm sure it shouldn't be a problem if I call her princess Meghan instead of Her Royal Highness princess.......

No, you just make yourself look ill-informed.

itsstillmehere · 06/01/2025 19:11

Gosh there's some claptrap on here today along with a great deal of ignorance about the UK.

Baital · 06/01/2025 19:12

Wasn't it Marion Crawford in the 1950s? 1960s? That published QE2's family nickname was Lilibet? Widely known for decades.

Poppyseeds79 · 06/01/2025 19:14

Choccyscofffy · 06/01/2025 18:44

I’ve just seen the video and whilst it looks a bit disorganised, Meghan doesn’t ‘absolutely ignore’ the woman. The woman has 90% of Meghan’s attention.

Meghan was pregnant sitting on the floor surrounded by mothers and some absolutely adorable babies, it’s natural that her attention was going to drift to the babies.

I agree that the set up should have been discussed in advance. Meghan sitting on the floor talking to a woman in a chair was never going to be natural. It would have been better to have Meghan and the lady sitting together. Maybe she was told she was going to have playtime with some mothers and babies.

There is sometimes awkwardness at these types of events but looks like mothers2mothers were happy with the event and there were sweet moments like this:

Meghan and the woman trying to tell her story were originally sat together. Infact I'm sure that seating plan was very much deliberately so the woman could speak to her. Presumably nobody was aware Meghan was going to launch herself onto the floor and insist everyone to get down there with her 😆

The man who was overseeing the optics 'helped one of the other women' to get on the floor (nearly pushed her over on to her knees). He then directed Meghan to the woman relating her story. Obviously Meghan had made the mistake of demanding everyone sat on the floor in the 1st place, so it'd look really bad if she got back up to sit next to the woman... However, she could have at least listened to her story vs a few gormless glances in her general direction, a few 'Mmm's'. Then back to the important business of staging the photos of herself.

She wasn't pregnant at that point. She just hadn't took Archie along with her. Instead she took some hand me down baby clothes.

IcedPurple · 06/01/2025 19:25

Lavenderfarmcottage · 06/01/2025 18:08

Insightful post, especially about the ‘help’ in UK being upper class. I do agree that the internet is informative and that anyone dating a Prince would have googled a few things. She also had friends that were in those circles in the UK such as the SoHo house set

Insightful post, especially about the ‘help’ in UK being upper class.

That may have been true maybe half a century ago, but it's not anymore.

Google the team Meghan had working with her as a royal. Lots of savvy young people, many of them women, from a range of ethnic backgrounds and nationalities. Meghan was very lucky to have such talented staff working just for her, without having to pay them a penny. But for some people, nothing is ever enough.

cheezy · 06/01/2025 19:25

Poppyseeds79 · 06/01/2025 19:14

Meghan and the woman trying to tell her story were originally sat together. Infact I'm sure that seating plan was very much deliberately so the woman could speak to her. Presumably nobody was aware Meghan was going to launch herself onto the floor and insist everyone to get down there with her 😆

The man who was overseeing the optics 'helped one of the other women' to get on the floor (nearly pushed her over on to her knees). He then directed Meghan to the woman relating her story. Obviously Meghan had made the mistake of demanding everyone sat on the floor in the 1st place, so it'd look really bad if she got back up to sit next to the woman... However, she could have at least listened to her story vs a few gormless glances in her general direction, a few 'Mmm's'. Then back to the important business of staging the photos of herself.

She wasn't pregnant at that point. She just hadn't took Archie along with her. Instead she took some hand me down baby clothes.

Edited

She’s unbelievably rude in that video.

MummyJ12 · 06/01/2025 19:37

If that was my story and I was trying to tell it to Meghan then I would have been upset by the encounter and lack of engagement and empathy.
Meghan was more than distracted, she was inattentive and rude and it doesn’t come across well at all. That story would have hugely affected me. It did when I heard it. That lady deserved to be treated with more respect. Meghan was barely paying her any attention and I don’t think she was taking it in otherwise she wouldn’t have behaved how she did. I hope.

Jumborollers · 06/01/2025 19:57

Baital · 06/01/2025 19:12

Wasn't it Marion Crawford in the 1950s? 1960s? That published QE2's family nickname was Lilibet? Widely known for decades.

It's awkward isn't when the person you're naming your child after is not pleased about it?😂

BruFord · 06/01/2025 20:07

@Poppyseeds79 Probably not, but perhaps faffing around with cakes and flowers from the outset would still have been a better strategy than what they did. I honestly think that the interviews and “Spare” turned people against them - better to have got on with something fresh and new right away.

Anyway, hindsight is a wonderful thing.

MrsFinkelstein · 06/01/2025 20:12

MummyJ12 · 06/01/2025 19:37

If that was my story and I was trying to tell it to Meghan then I would have been upset by the encounter and lack of engagement and empathy.
Meghan was more than distracted, she was inattentive and rude and it doesn’t come across well at all. That story would have hugely affected me. It did when I heard it. That lady deserved to be treated with more respect. Meghan was barely paying her any attention and I don’t think she was taking it in otherwise she wouldn’t have behaved how she did. I hope.

I can't help but think what Diana would have done (as Harry and the SS make out Meghan is Diana 2.0).

Diana would have sat right next to that woman, turning in her chair to face her and would have likely held her hands while she was speaking. Hugs would more than likely been generously deployed. Diana would have cried. I think Catherine and Sophie would have done similar to Diana actually in that situation, (edit) but not so demonstrative.

I'm not a Diana fan by any means, I think she was a deeply flawed, often annoying individual but her empathy cannot be disputed.

In that meeting, the chairs were set up, Meghan should never have sat on the floor and made the othera do so, the majority of women clearly weren't keen on getting on the ground.

AndrinaAdamosballetshoes · 06/01/2025 20:14

cheezy · 06/01/2025 19:25

She’s unbelievably rude in that video.

It’s not a one off either, remember the smirking video of her when an autistic woman was singing the Canadian national anthem? even Harry wouldn’t look at Meghan when she was trying to catch his eye.

SatansBobbleheadedDashboardOrnament · 06/01/2025 20:14

MrsFinkelstein · 06/01/2025 20:12

I can't help but think what Diana would have done (as Harry and the SS make out Meghan is Diana 2.0).

Diana would have sat right next to that woman, turning in her chair to face her and would have likely held her hands while she was speaking. Hugs would more than likely been generously deployed. Diana would have cried. I think Catherine and Sophie would have done similar to Diana actually in that situation, (edit) but not so demonstrative.

I'm not a Diana fan by any means, I think she was a deeply flawed, often annoying individual but her empathy cannot be disputed.

In that meeting, the chairs were set up, Meghan should never have sat on the floor and made the othera do so, the majority of women clearly weren't keen on getting on the ground.

Edited

You are a satirical genius.

MrsFinkelstein · 06/01/2025 20:18

SatansBobbleheadedDashboardOrnament · 06/01/2025 20:14

You are a satirical genius.

Thanks.

I think?

MummyJ12 · 06/01/2025 20:20

MrsFinkelstein · 06/01/2025 20:12

I can't help but think what Diana would have done (as Harry and the SS make out Meghan is Diana 2.0).

Diana would have sat right next to that woman, turning in her chair to face her and would have likely held her hands while she was speaking. Hugs would more than likely been generously deployed. Diana would have cried. I think Catherine and Sophie would have done similar to Diana actually in that situation, (edit) but not so demonstrative.

I'm not a Diana fan by any means, I think she was a deeply flawed, often annoying individual but her empathy cannot be disputed.

In that meeting, the chairs were set up, Meghan should never have sat on the floor and made the othera do so, the majority of women clearly weren't keen on getting on the ground.

Edited

I completely agree. I was thinking exactly the same thing. There definitely would have been more listening, more interaction and more empathy had it been Diana, Catherine or Sophie. Or anyone!

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.