Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

With Love, Meghan - criticisms and genuine concern for her mental health

1000 replies

Lavenderfarmcottage · 05/01/2025 16:34

I am probably going to be flogged for posting this and chased down the dark laneways of Mumsnet as bystanders yell “Shame Shame Shame”.

I weighed in yesterday about a thread on Meghan and her new Netflix show. I made some criticisms about the trailer and certain cliche’s in the way it was produced. Hypocritical of me to be posting this but I feel guilty and have reflected. I am actually looking forward to watching it on Netflix and my criticisms were pretty minor and not exclusive to her show - it’s a common issue I have.

Meghan has struggled with mental health because of criticism. The reaction to ‘With Love… Meghan’ has been fairly brutal.

I think it would be really good if we refrained from saying anything negative about the series or Meghan Markle. That’s not the point of this thread.

I want to know if you think the criticisms have gone too far. The Princess of Wales is not on the scene and we are protective of her rightly so. That leaves Meghan as media fodder though.

Do you think it’s time Meghan and Harry were given a break ? I do. I think we’ve been far too harsh and the criticisms have gotten out of hand.

I think we also forget the cultural relevance. If we went into the homes or Gwyneth, Julia Roberts etc and I would probably feel the divide too. American culture doesn’t apologise for wealth and hollywoood is highly competitive.

Having a confident demeanour, throwing your head back Julia Roberts style when you laugh and unapologetically selling $$$ vagina products like Gwyneth Paltrow is how it over there. People talk loudly and confidently and are polished and rehearsed especially in the
Competitive world of Hollywood…

Are we all being too hard ?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
MummyJ12 · 06/01/2025 16:57

Choccyscofffy · 06/01/2025 16:51

But most people don’t hate her, the ‘hate watching’ cohort is a minority.

I think the first episode will have good viewship but overall, I don’t think it will pull the hours of viewing needed for it to be worth the deal and I am guessing that they will part ways by the end of the year. I hope I’m wrong.

itsstillmehere · 06/01/2025 17:00

The entire world was obsessed with Harry and Meghan's marriage ? 🤷‍♀️

MakeYourOwnMusicStartYourOwnDance · 06/01/2025 17:00

Rhaidimiddim · 06/01/2025 16:16

"Racism" is the new approved sugar script for explaining the negative reviews of the Netflix trailer.

What's a sugar script for those of us out of the loop of terms and names? Speaking in plain English please?

Choccyscofffy · 06/01/2025 17:01

IcedPurple · 06/01/2025 16:54

Well, it was you who mentioned them.

You've said "I can see will be trending #no.1 on Netflix for sure." Can I ask who you think is the target audience who would be watching? What is it about this show that you think can attract a huge viewing audience?

I said even many of those who don’t like her will watch, I didn’t say those will be the majority.

There is a market for trad wife aesthetic like Ballerina Farm (not me).

Netflix are quite savvy and know what their viewers want.

BruFord · 06/01/2025 17:03

@MummyJ12 I agree that the first episode needs to be good in order to bring audiences back for the rest of the series- -that’s true of any show, of course.

I would genuinely like to see this project succeed, because it’s far better for them to be moving forward with new projects rather than talking about the past. It’s not my type of thing, but I hope that other people enjoy it.

IcedPurple · 06/01/2025 17:07

Choccyscofffy · 06/01/2025 17:01

I said even many of those who don’t like her will watch, I didn’t say those will be the majority.

There is a market for trad wife aesthetic like Ballerina Farm (not me).

Netflix are quite savvy and know what their viewers want.

So the great feminist who was too modern and outspoken for the royal family is now a 'trad wife'? Interesting turn of events.

Simply appearing on NF is not a guarantee of success. All the Sussex projects other than the 'documentary' have flopped. This may be more successful, if for the cringe value if nothing else, but I doubt it can save their contract.

hopeishere · 06/01/2025 17:13

@MakeYourOwnMusicStartYourOwnDance

What's a sugar script for those of us out of the loop of terms and names? Speaking in plain English please?

Sugar is the term used for Meghan "superfans" who will defend her no matter what.

MummyJ12 · 06/01/2025 17:13

BruFord · 06/01/2025 17:03

@MummyJ12 I agree that the first episode needs to be good in order to bring audiences back for the rest of the series- -that’s true of any show, of course.

I would genuinely like to see this project succeed, because it’s far better for them to be moving forward with new projects rather than talking about the past. It’s not my type of thing, but I hope that other people enjoy it.

Absolutely right. I was also trying to say that the first episode will get good viewership because people will be curious and watch it for various reasons. Yes, of course if it’s good it will keep some viewership but I don’t think it will continue to achieve the “hours of viewing” throughout the 8 episodes and overall needed to keep the deal. Again, I hope I’m wrong. I just wish they had gone this positive direction from the start as she would have had the following to make it a success for sure.

Poppyseeds79 · 06/01/2025 17:21

MummyJ12 · 06/01/2025 17:13

Absolutely right. I was also trying to say that the first episode will get good viewership because people will be curious and watch it for various reasons. Yes, of course if it’s good it will keep some viewership but I don’t think it will continue to achieve the “hours of viewing” throughout the 8 episodes and overall needed to keep the deal. Again, I hope I’m wrong. I just wish they had gone this positive direction from the start as she would have had the following to make it a success for sure.

I 100% doubt this is where she saw herself though. Faffing about with sponge cakes, and making flower arrangements. I think she envisioned herself a pioneer and a woman's embassador. I expect she saw herself being clamored for to give speeches at charities, and hobnobbing with the 'important people, doing important things'. It appears the fact that she has very little of value to say about any topic squashed that dream.

Nordione1 · 06/01/2025 17:25

MummyJ12 · 06/01/2025 17:13

Absolutely right. I was also trying to say that the first episode will get good viewership because people will be curious and watch it for various reasons. Yes, of course if it’s good it will keep some viewership but I don’t think it will continue to achieve the “hours of viewing” throughout the 8 episodes and overall needed to keep the deal. Again, I hope I’m wrong. I just wish they had gone this positive direction from the start as she would have had the following to make it a success for sure.

Doubt it. However keen viewers are on her, if the trailer is showing the highlights of the 8 episodes there's no way many people could watch that much boring dross. Even someone with a personality would struggle. Shame as it looks pretty! Very Stepford Wives girly lunch trad wife aesthetic. Which is so very Meghan as we know

"When I was eleven years old....."

MummyJ12 · 06/01/2025 17:28

Nordione1 · 06/01/2025 17:25

Doubt it. However keen viewers are on her, if the trailer is showing the highlights of the 8 episodes there's no way many people could watch that much boring dross. Even someone with a personality would struggle. Shame as it looks pretty! Very Stepford Wives girly lunch trad wife aesthetic. Which is so very Meghan as we know

"When I was eleven years old....."

I think we’re making the same point, just in different ways! 😂

mainecooncatonahottinroof · 06/01/2025 17:30

Ellaelle · 06/01/2025 07:23

The nation, in fact the world saw the wedding! She is, mossey on down to Wikipedia it will really enlighten you

Is that your best source rofl?

She is not Princess Meghan!!

What's "mossey" when it's at home?!

mainecooncatonahottinroof · 06/01/2025 17:32

RockingLock · 06/01/2025 07:25

What are you not understanding? The LEGAL wedding took place on Saturday. They class their wedding when they did personal, private vows as per a previous post like many other people on the planet. Still with us?!

I think you are the one missing in action rofl.

mainecooncatonahottinroof · 06/01/2025 17:41

Lavenderfarmcottage · 06/01/2025 10:01

I guess the Catherine and Meghan issue is that the Royal family is unwittingly racist and mysoginistic even if not intended to be.

Meghan has the same qualifications as Kate and did the exact same job, gained the exact same publicity almost as Kate yet was paid less.

Meghan had the same fame as Kate and qualifications yet stood behind her, on balconies. It must have stung a bit to empower herself as a woman and succeed as. woman of only to end and end up standing behind a white woman on a balcony that does the exact same job sans title.

Your Job description as a princess is to talk very little, look good and not have opinions and defer to the status of your husband.

I think that the reality of that plus what happens behind closed doors and the crap being said would be really hard. It would be hard to not be jealous - especially if you were getting negative press and taking bullets so that a privileged white woman could be protected and her husband and her remain in control of billions and elevated in the spotlight, while you get told where you can live/go/give up your freedom & precious success and fame that didn’t have restrictions.

its all prettt bonkers when you think about it how much the royal family differs from a society that is meant to champion equal rights and pay and freedoms.

No criticism of Kate at all - though she and William are a protected species by the royal family and top of the pecking order. I think it would be tiring deferring to people that may not necessarily repay the favour.

Edited

Meghan absolutely did not do the same job as Kate!! That's ridiculous.

What "qualifications" does a royal wife require then??!

Nor was Meghan " taking bullets so that a privileged white woman could be protected" - where are you dragging this nonsense from???! I rather think Kate is the more restricted of the two of them!!

What is actually wrong with people!

AndrinaAdamosballetshoes · 06/01/2025 17:42

You are obsessed with people NOT KNOWING THEM! (Just copying your writing style for reference) also YOU DON’T KNOW THEM! Yet you spend so much time writing lengthy posts defending them making personal attacks towards other posters about people YOU DON’T KNOW 😂😂😂 you really are quite funny.

For your information you don’t have to know someone to form an opinion of them particularly when they have laid bare their thoughts and feelings to the world through various channels. If we had to know everyone personally to have an opinion on them then that means no one can have an opinion on anyone ever, I haven’t met Boris Johnson but I think he is a bit of a buffoon because of the things he says and does, that’s how forming an opinion on public figures works, hopefully that will help you moving forward.

Adamante · 06/01/2025 17:43

What's "mossey" when it's at home?!

Mosey? Mosey on down?

mainecooncatonahottinroof · 06/01/2025 17:43

x2boys · 06/01/2025 10:16

He was a a high serving member of the royal family not some ill educated nobody but it I was pointing out his remarks were racist which therfore makes him racist not just forthright

FGS standards were very different then!! His remarks raised eyebrows but weren't judged as racist in the manner of today.

Thedom · 06/01/2025 17:46

@Nordione1
Athough I don't have C list celebs round at my house troughing cake and saying this is "the most glamorous thing they have ever done" TBF.

Meghan doesn't have them round her house either !!

Nordione1 · 06/01/2025 17:46

Thedom · 06/01/2025 17:46

@Nordione1
Athough I don't have C list celebs round at my house troughing cake and saying this is "the most glamorous thing they have ever done" TBF.

Meghan doesn't have them round her house either !!

Edited

Well, not at her own house. Just the faux one presumably.

Rhaidimiddim · 06/01/2025 17:47

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

pelargoniums · 06/01/2025 17:50

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Oh for god’s sake.

Nordione1 · 06/01/2025 17:51

mainecooncatonahottinroof · 06/01/2025 17:41

Meghan absolutely did not do the same job as Kate!! That's ridiculous.

What "qualifications" does a royal wife require then??!

Nor was Meghan " taking bullets so that a privileged white woman could be protected" - where are you dragging this nonsense from???! I rather think Kate is the more restricted of the two of them!!

What is actually wrong with people!

My favourite line was "meghan had the same fame as Kate". Yes, that's right. Number 6 on the call sheet of a little watched Canadian cable tv show. Number 6 that no one had heard of before the engagement interview. Very funny.

MrsFinkelstein · 06/01/2025 17:53

Lavenderfarmcottage · 06/01/2025 14:29

I think you might have a point. Catherine would have been working into old age.

They actually would have been better suited to swapping roles. Catherine not that fussed on fame.

And that's the exact cultural difference right there. That's exactly why Meghan (& and any American possibly) would have struggled.

"Catherine not that fussed on fame."

The RF are not, and have never been "celebrities". They end up being famous, but they serve a very specific constitutional function. Viewing joining the RF as a route to fame and celebrity will only guarantee failure and heartache.

Catherine has clearly never viewed that way, not has Sophie. That's why they are successful in their roles. (Sophie made some errors early on but seems to have got it right now).

Citizens of countries who do not have Constitutional Monarchies seem to really struggle with this concept of "fame" but not being "celebrities".

Ellaelle · 06/01/2025 17:57

mainecooncatonahottinroof · 06/01/2025 17:30

Is that your best source rofl?

She is not Princess Meghan!!

What's "mossey" when it's at home?!

Ooopsy 1 "s" too many should be mosey 🤭on down what's the problem with Wikipedia?

I bet you had a mosey and looked for your self and saw that Wikipedia says she IS a princess, so now you're moving the goal posts

mainecooncatonahottinroof · 06/01/2025 17:59

RockingLock · 06/01/2025 11:32

I cannot get over how invested you are. I have no idea about half of this because quite frankly I don’t care about someone I don’t know and have never met. That’s the problem with your brigade - get a bloody life.

also I will once again state the obvious - you are seeing what the media is showing. You have no idea what the truth is. Meghan has been largely absent from public life for a number of years now I believe? So I’m not entirely sure how she’s always banging on about herself.

I follow someone called Kristin cavallari on IG, and listen to her podcasts. I find it quite funny how she says one thing in her podcast and the media turn it into something it isn’t, on a daily basis (I know this because she shares it, I don’t read the news as it’s all bollocks). This is someone who gets positive media attention as well as negative. You’re a fool if you believe everything you read and that’s why i just can’t be convinced by anything anyone on here has yet said as ammunition for why they hate someone THEY HAVE NEVER MET. I’ll keep hammering that point home because I’ll never wrap my head around it.

You can "hammer it home" all you want in your rude manner - but you are just as "invested" as anyone else lol!

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread