Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

C4 Dispatches on Duchies of Cornwall and Lancaster

304 replies

Babadookinthewardrobe · 03/11/2024 09:24

I couldn’t find another thread on this. I watched this yesterday. I am so angry. The royal family are grim parasites funding their luxury lifestyle from the sweat of the British people. Via the duchies they are rinsing the NHS and charities for millions. It’s horrific. No IHT, no CGT, no transparency, no consideration for the environment of which they are supposed to be stewards in the duchies.

Their behaviour and greed is absolutely grim
and I am so sick of the lot of them. I’m joining republic, I’m so shocked at what I’ve just seen. The French had the right idea.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
AuxArmesCitoyens · 03/11/2024 14:43
  1. The income from both Duchies has been voluntarily taxed since 1993.

Famously, the UK has had a tax system since some time before 1993.

No other fucker in the land can choose not to pay tax. Why should they? More importantly, why don't they want to pay more and see their beloved Britain prosper?

Serenster · 03/11/2024 14:43

unincorporated businesses don’t get to choose whether or not they pay the tax they owe.

Unincorporated business don’t owe tax though. They have no legal personality.

Cynic17 · 03/11/2024 14:44

rwalker · 03/11/2024 13:49

I don’t get it charities and NHS rent loads of properties from loads of LL
the duchey is a LL like the rest of them

as for NHS money the bigger scandal is the enormous amount they waste rather than the rent they pay to LL

Absolutely correct.

Serenster · 03/11/2024 14:46

No other fucker in the land can choose not to pay tax.

Jimmy Carr might disagree with you. From HMRC’s 2023 performance update:

  • the average value of our criminal cases increased from £2.3 million in 2016-17 to £6.2 million
  • our serious fraud investigators initiated 396 new criminal cases and more than 12,500 civil investigations into suspected fraud
  • 240 prosecutions were brought as a result of HMRC criminal investigations, securing 218 convictions with a success rate of 91% in court
  • we recovered £165 million in criminal assets using UK proceeds of crime legislation
Using new powers, we named 27 tax avoidance scheme promoters and 5 directors during 2022-23, alongside details of the 31 tax avoidance schemes they were promoting.
Serenster · 03/11/2024 14:47

(As an aside, I think the Queen should have agreed to pay income tax for sooner than she did, actually - but there is also no denying that societally and politically this was not such an issue for much of the 20th century).

AuxArmesCitoyens · 03/11/2024 14:50

So they can lobby behind the scenes to change laws that work in their interests but not to change laws that would see them lose money? Interesting

Babadookinthewardrobe · 03/11/2024 14:52

AuxArmesCitoyens · 03/11/2024 14:43

  1. The income from both Duchies has been voluntarily taxed since 1993.

Famously, the UK has had a tax system since some time before 1993.

No other fucker in the land can choose not to pay tax. Why should they? More importantly, why don't they want to pay more and see their beloved Britain prosper?

It isn’t about seeing their subjects prosper, it is about milking the people, the land and even the seabed for every last penny, whether or not it is harmful. Disgusting parasites.

Love your username!

OP posts:
AuxArmesCitoyens · 03/11/2024 14:53

OK so can we expect to see C and W in court soon on tax charges? I would fucking love that

upinaballoon · 03/11/2024 14:56

AuxArmesCitoyens · 03/11/2024 14:53

OK so can we expect to see C and W in court soon on tax charges? I would fucking love that

Of course you fucking would. What would the charge be against them?

AuxArmesCitoyens · 03/11/2024 15:01

Not paying inheritance tax due for C. I would have to get parliament to strike down his cosy personal exemption that no-one else in the country gets first, of course.

AgnesX · 03/11/2024 15:03

namechange1975 · 03/11/2024 10:23

I don't think the blame lies on one person but the whole RF isn't fit for purpose.

Fit for purpose? They're a family, a group of people whose place in society is hereditary. They're not a manufactured commodity that has to meet specific requirements.

You just have to read MN to see examples of dysfunctional families. Why do you expect the RF to be any different.

I believe that once Charles snuffs it everything will change

Babadookinthewardrobe · 03/11/2024 15:04

Tax evasion on a massive scale in collaboration with HMRC; environmental damage to areas of outstanding natural beauty (ref Dispatches evidence), failure to fulfil landlord responsibilities (again ref Dispatches).

OP posts:
pizzaHeart · 03/11/2024 15:04

Spectre8 · 03/11/2024 10:30

They CHOOSE to charge rent, they don't have to. They could charge £1 a year as a token gesture or a significant discount. After all they take taxpayers money to fund their royal duties, how about giving back to the people. They have enough wealth why do they need more? And then they have laws in place they don't even pay proper tax on their duchies.

People get angry amazon doesn't pay enough tax yet we have a RF who don't and noone gets angry at that. Well you should be. Take away their status and it's just a corporation and you would be angry.

Edited

This ^ absolutely.

Babadookinthewardrobe · 03/11/2024 15:04

That’s to @upinaballoon

OP posts:
BustingBaoBun · 03/11/2024 15:06

I believe that once Charles snuffs it everything will change

We thought that about when the Queen died.

ImNunTheWiser · 03/11/2024 15:06

Serenster · 03/11/2024 14:43

unincorporated businesses don’t get to choose whether or not they pay the tax they owe.

Unincorporated business don’t owe tax though. They have no legal personality.

Sigh.
The individual or individuals operating the unincorporated business owe income tax and NI on the profits of said business. They do not get choose whether they pay that tax or not. Unlike the individual involved in the Duchy of Cornwall.

Delphigirl · 03/11/2024 15:07

Serenster · 03/11/2024 13:49

I know wealthy people who have created homes for people. Or given away land for hospices and similar for free.

Like William building and funding a £3 million social housing development on Duchy of Cornwall land to tackle homelessness, along with giving £500k from his Foundation to the project? A project that was only launched in June last year, and in relation to a Duchy he’s only been the steward of for just over two years?

He is building houses on his own land which he will rent out for market rents. What is so admirable about that?

OneDandyPoet · 03/11/2024 15:08

Serenster · 03/11/2024 14:26

Just on that and taken directly from the Hansard record where the Duchy was debated in Parliament (as it regularly is):

The income of the Duchy is now well in excess of £20 million a year. The Prince pays voluntary income tax of about £4.9 million, but only on his income after meeting the expenditure on royal duties

Like any other taxpayer, the Prince of Wales deducts work expenses from gross taxable income, and pays tax on the remaining sum. In the years when this was Charles, this means for example that Camilla, Kate and Meghan’s work wardrobes were tax deductible expenses.

Blimey, so can I claim my everyday work wardrobe as a tax deductible expense?

AuxArmesCitoyens · 03/11/2024 15:08

24 whole units in one of the parts of the country most terribly blighted by rural poverty and hidden homelessness driven by second home ownership

Serenster · 03/11/2024 15:09

OneDandyPoet · 03/11/2024 15:08

Blimey, so can I claim my everyday work wardrobe as a tax deductible expense?

Plenty of normal working people can and do, yes.

Serenster · 03/11/2024 15:12

ImNunTheWiser · 03/11/2024 15:06

Sigh.
The individual or individuals operating the unincorporated business owe income tax and NI on the profits of said business. They do not get choose whether they pay that tax or not. Unlike the individual involved in the Duchy of Cornwall.

Sighing right back at you since that’s correct yes, but not what you’ve previously said.

kiraric · 03/11/2024 15:12

I don't have a particular issue with the royals charging rent including to the NHS and other public services.

I do think the less of them for making least £28m from windfarms because the Duchy of Lancaster retains a feudal right to charge for cables crossing the foreshore.

That isn't a service they are providing like being a landlord, that is deliberately profiteering from something they are doing nothing to earn. If they didn't take that £ they do not need, there would be more wind farms - and they claim to care about the environment which makes them giant hypocrites.

Delphigirl · 03/11/2024 15:12

Serenster · 03/11/2024 14:26

Just on that and taken directly from the Hansard record where the Duchy was debated in Parliament (as it regularly is):

The income of the Duchy is now well in excess of £20 million a year. The Prince pays voluntary income tax of about £4.9 million, but only on his income after meeting the expenditure on royal duties

Like any other taxpayer, the Prince of Wales deducts work expenses from gross taxable income, and pays tax on the remaining sum. In the years when this was Charles, this means for example that Camilla, Kate and Meghan’s work wardrobes were tax deductible expenses.

Except unlike other taxpayers he does not have to declare what expenses he is deducting and he has never broken down what expenses he is deducting. Does that include the costs of the vanity gold coach he had made for his coronation at vast vast expense, for example?
I have to wear smart clothes to work too, but I am not allowed to deduct my work wardrobe, quite rightly, on the basis that even if I was not going to work I would have to clothe myself.
please don’t pretend it is in anyway comparable to normal taxpayers, we aren’t stupid you know.

SweetSakura · 03/11/2024 15:15

kiraric · 03/11/2024 15:12

I don't have a particular issue with the royals charging rent including to the NHS and other public services.

I do think the less of them for making least £28m from windfarms because the Duchy of Lancaster retains a feudal right to charge for cables crossing the foreshore.

That isn't a service they are providing like being a landlord, that is deliberately profiteering from something they are doing nothing to earn. If they didn't take that £ they do not need, there would be more wind farms - and they claim to care about the environment which makes them giant hypocrites.

I'm fascinated at the distinction you are making. I can't see it applies. Most landlords of non residential property don't provide a "service" as most tenants (certainly tenants of whole buildings) take the building on a full repairing basis so the landlord does nothing, just collects rent.

It's all grim. The royals could clearly do far more for the country.

Why people insisted on singing about them and bowing and scraping to them I don't k or.

Delphigirl · 03/11/2024 15:16

Serenster · 03/11/2024 14:43

unincorporated businesses don’t get to choose whether or not they pay the tax they owe.

Unincorporated business don’t owe tax though. They have no legal personality.

No but the individuals who run the businesses do. The duchies say on the one hand say we are not incorporated so won’t pay corporation tax and on the other say although we are private, the individuals who own us won’t pay CGT and will only pay a small voluntary part of the income tax other individuals pay, and btw we will do the calculation and not show you our workings.