Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

A Very Royal Scandal (Amazon Prime)

315 replies

MrsLeonFarrell · 19/09/2024 17:50

Apologies if there is a thread about this.

I haven't watched Scoop, because Netflix won't work on my old TV box so I have no idea how this compares. I watched all 3 episodes and found it bizarre. I did like that it didn't include any royals outside the York family.

What struck me the most was how sheltered Andrew's team must have been to think him doing an interview was a good idea. I'm just a member of the public and I wouldn't have advised him to speak for himself going only by what I read about him before Epstein was even heard of. Why on earth would anyone advise him to do this? Why did they think it had gone well? And why has he not just retired out of the public view and accepted there is no way back.

The arrogance of some people is astounding. I don't even think it's a royal thing but more a monied sense of entitlement, although ironically he didn't seem to have much money.

Anyone else seen it?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
Makingwaves2 · 22/09/2024 18:07

BustingBaoBun · 22/09/2024 16:43

PPhilip was known for being somewhat brusque and outspoken and I am just surprised that he let Andrew get away with all that he did. He was almost like a passive parent

We talk a lot about the queen enabling him, but why wasn't Philip giving him what for?

Prince Philip wasn’t exactly pure as the driven snow was he? He seems to have been quite a distant parent to all his children and probably didn’t know anything about it. I don’t get the impression he had close relationship with any of his children.

joolsella · 22/09/2024 18:24

Suspect Philip would have encouraged his son

They have a different outlook to normal people

MrsLeonFarrell · 22/09/2024 18:30

joolsella · 22/09/2024 18:24

Suspect Philip would have encouraged his son

They have a different outlook to normal people

I don't think he would have encouraged him to be friends with a paedophile. Philip supported the monarchy and the Queen and would have known what a mess it would create.

But Philip got older and his grip on the family loosened.

OP posts:
joolsella · 22/09/2024 18:31

Yes, you're right

But he probably didnt mind him shagging young girls

Norahh · 22/09/2024 19:14

BustingBaoBun · 22/09/2024 16:43

PPhilip was known for being somewhat brusque and outspoken and I am just surprised that he let Andrew get away with all that he did. He was almost like a passive parent

We talk a lot about the queen enabling him, but why wasn't Philip giving him what for?

Was there something about HMTQ and PP marriage and infidelity?

There is a 10 year age gap between Anne and Andrew - thats unusual - maybe the marriage was under strain and PA was the negotiated 'patch up baby'?

So HMTQ favoured / indulged him and PP kept out of their relationship?

Seasmoke · 22/09/2024 19:58

There are rumours Phil isnt Andrews father. Phil was a serial shagger ( allegedly). That may explain why Phil didn't put his foot down. Or maybe he simply didn't care either.

EmeraldRoulette · 22/09/2024 19:59

I watched half the first episode and found it dull

could be my unsettled brain

does it get better? I thought Scoop was excellent.

Makingwaves2 · 22/09/2024 20:29

MrsLeonFarrell · 22/09/2024 18:30

I don't think he would have encouraged him to be friends with a paedophile. Philip supported the monarchy and the Queen and would have known what a mess it would create.

But Philip got older and his grip on the family loosened.

Andrew wasn’t a paedophile for the hundredth time. He wasn’t sexually interested or active with children.

CathyorClaire · 22/09/2024 20:37

why wasn't Philip giving him what for?

I suspect Randy was Philip's favourite son too.

Lots of stories that he was irritated by Charles' sensitivity. He sent him to a bleak school he hated to 'toughen him up' and never relented despite his obvious misery. Eddie ducked the manly marines in favour of the theatre.

Randy was not only the eldest of the second chance family (huge plus in family dynamics) but turned out to be a spirited war hero in the mould of his father.

Indulged by both.

BustingBaoBun · 22/09/2024 21:33

Makingwaves2 · 22/09/2024 20:29

Andrew wasn’t a paedophile for the hundredth time. He wasn’t sexually interested or active with children.

Who has said he was? He wasn't

upinaballoon · 22/09/2024 21:36

BustingBaoBun · 22/09/2024 21:33

Who has said he was? He wasn't

I think there is a mis-understanding a few posts ago. One person was talking about Andrew being friends with a paedophile and it was read, perhaps in haste, as Andrew being described as a paedophile.

Serenster · 22/09/2024 21:37

There is a 10 year age gap between Anne and Andrew - thats unusual - maybe the marriage was under strain and PA was the negotiated 'patch up baby'?

Their lives that decade weren’t usual either though. Charles was born in November 1948, Anne just under two years later in August 1950. Just 18 months later George VI died and Elizabeth was Queen, not just of the UK but of a large number of realms. If they had been thinking of expanding their family again in 1952, that would have pretty much coincided with her accession.

Pregnancy was very much hidden away in the 1950s. It’s not hard to imagine the new Queen, her husband, her mother and her advisers felt she needed to be visible and involved for the period immediately afterwards?

it has certainly been written by biographers that she very much wanted a larger family and so pushed to have more children when her reign was well settled.

Makingwaves2 · 22/09/2024 21:46

upinaballoon · 22/09/2024 21:36

I think there is a mis-understanding a few posts ago. One person was talking about Andrew being friends with a paedophile and it was read, perhaps in haste, as Andrew being described as a paedophile.

Oh sorry! Yes that’s the case.

MrsLeonFarrell · 22/09/2024 21:52

Makingwaves2 · 22/09/2024 20:29

Andrew wasn’t a paedophile for the hundredth time. He wasn’t sexually interested or active with children.

I was referring to Epstein, a convicted paedophile, and Andrew's friendship with him. I don't think Philip would have approved of that friendship.

OP posts:
MrsLeonFarrell · 22/09/2024 21:55

Seasmoke · 22/09/2024 19:58

There are rumours Phil isnt Andrews father. Phil was a serial shagger ( allegedly). That may explain why Phil didn't put his foot down. Or maybe he simply didn't care either.

I don't think there is any evidence that Andrew was not Philip's son. The monarch having children from an affair would be an extremely serious thing and I can't see the late Queen doing that.

That's aside from the fact that she always seemed devoted to her husband and committed to her faith.

OP posts:
Makingwaves2 · 22/09/2024 22:01

MrsLeonFarrell · 22/09/2024 21:55

I don't think there is any evidence that Andrew was not Philip's son. The monarch having children from an affair would be an extremely serious thing and I can't see the late Queen doing that.

That's aside from the fact that she always seemed devoted to her husband and committed to her faith.

Yes the very idea is ridiculous

adriftinadenofvipers · 22/09/2024 22:08

BustingBaoBun · 20/09/2024 15:23

I agree. Years and years before this all broke, apparently it was said the Queen had misgivings about his trade envoy role and his friendship with JE.
The trouble is she did nothing about it and whatever I think of the Queen good or bad there is no getting away from the fact she enabled her awful son.

By the point she had misgivings he had set his behaviour as entitled, greedy, vain, boorish and rude with endless backhanders and deals with dodgy rich businessmen.
I have no sympathy with him whatsoever, he had decades of living the high life and apart from movement being restricted now, he still lives a rich privileged life.
No sympathy with his ex or daughters either I'm afraid.

I do have sympathy with his daughters. They never invited any of this.

ThatSunnyShark · 22/09/2024 23:03

newnamethanks · 21/09/2024 22:23

Iirc, I think I remember reading, years ago, that the young woman leaving, mentioned above and who looks very young indeed, is in her twenties and is the daughter of a friend of Epstein. Happy to be corrected if I'm wrong.

You are wrong. The girl's name has never been publicly revealed.
She does look very young indeed.

ThatSunnyShark · 22/09/2024 23:06

And Sarah Ferguson got a terrible divorce settlement. I had not realised she was at risk of losing custody of her daughters. Maybe this is why she accepted so little money in return for joint custody?

Seasmoke · 23/09/2024 04:30

adriftinadenofvipers · 22/09/2024 22:08

I do have sympathy with his daughters. They never invited any of this.

They were happy to accept money and gifts from their fathers strange friends without asking questions, snd have dodgy people at their birthday parties. They really must be dumb as bricks or shockingly naive

pantsalot · 23/09/2024 04:33

Harassedevictee · 19/09/2024 18:14

I’ve just binge watched all 3 episodes. Very different perspective to Scoop.

I think part of the issue is at the start the Palace/RF believed Andrew. I think part of it will be that the RF, like others in the public eye, may have been targets of blackmail attempts/mistruths before so it is feasible they didn’t take the claims seriously.

What I find interesting that neither drama covered the Security Services who would/should have had records of dates and times PA met Epstein, Maxwell etc. For example it has been revealed RAVAC require 28 days notice if PH wants security when he visits the UK. I don’t believe senior RF members wake up and go I fancy flying to the USA today to stay with Epstein, visit his Island etc. It would be planned so they could work out shifts, risk assess etc. so it should have been known if PA was in Tramps or at Pizza Hut in Woking etc. on a certain day. Any discrepancies should have rung alarm bells.

This - exactly what I was thinking. Also, is there nothing in place to protect the Crown in terms of intelligence so they don't get mixed up with the wrong people?.

pantsalot · 23/09/2024 04:59

PP and the Profumo Affair?

Seasmoke · 23/09/2024 05:06

pantsalot · 23/09/2024 04:33

This - exactly what I was thinking. Also, is there nothing in place to protect the Crown in terms of intelligence so they don't get mixed up with the wrong people?.

The Palace is crawling with advisers and Intelligence. I suspect the problem is that some of the people they are advising aren't very intelligent, yet think they are so don't want to listen to the advice of people they see as their inferiors. There's not a lot you can do if you advise but people ignore you. I suspect there is an element of deference amongst staff too so people who work for the RF will do as they say. Like Prince Andrews adviser for the interview.

CurlewKate · 23/09/2024 06:48

I've only watched the first episode-I am so worried Michael Sheen is going to make me believe Andrew is innocent!!!

MrsLeonFarrell · 23/09/2024 06:56

CurlewKate · 23/09/2024 06:48

I've only watched the first episode-I am so worried Michael Sheen is going to make me believe Andrew is innocent!!!

I don't think that will happen but it does depend on what you think he is guilty of.

Did he sleep with Virginia Guiffre?
Did he know she was trafficked?

I think these are separate questions. I would definitely think the answer to the first was yes, I don't think they were clear on the second.

Andrew's downfall is depicted as happening because he didn't show any empathy for Epstein's victims and didn't show any regret or apologise for his friendship with Epstein, even after he was convicted.

Actually I'm pretty glad the arrogant man didn't worm his way out of everything.

OP posts: