Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family
Thread gallery
23
thecrossIambearing · 01/09/2024 15:48

Hughs · 01/09/2024 15:47

One of the Queen's sisters..

Do you know anything about the royal family?

Remind me - how many of them were there again ? 😂

GorgeousTulips · 01/09/2024 15:48

Allthegoodnamesarechosen · 01/09/2024 14:35

‘Perhaps if they were to sign a NDA, Harry could serve the royal family in some way and Archie and Lilibet get to know their grandfather.’

Archie and the unfortunately named Lilibet have two grandfathers, one a lot geographically closer than England, but they don’t seem to have much chance of meeting him, either.

For children who have three first cousins, many second cousins (Anne’s grandchildren, Andrew’s grandchildren) plenty of aunts and uncles on both sides of their family, they know just one: Meghan’s mother. I have less family than almost anyone I know ( only child of only children ) so I don’t have much understanding of extended families and their benefits . Even I knew my grandparents , though.

That's another area in which they have absolutely nothing in common. Harry was brought up in a huge extended family who went away to Balmoral for a month together every year and spent Xmas at Sandringham all together. She spent most of her time with one parent or the other, mostly with her father. She didn't have that sort of upbringing at all, and so probably doesn't see what she's denying her own children, and Harry himself.

IcedPurple · 01/09/2024 15:48

One of the Queen's sisters was an alcoholic who was refused permission to marry the man she loved.

"One" of the Queen's sisters? She only had one.

And no, Margaret was not refused permission to marry. She could have married Townsend and retained all her royal privileges other than her place in the LoS, which was increasingly irrelevant in any case given that the Queen already had two healthy children. However, she chose not to.

The Crown is not history.

BruFord · 01/09/2024 15:49

Camilla and Sophie have put in years of solid work on unglamourous causes and have never whinged or made it all about them.

@Abouttimeforanamechange I agree that this would be the only way for Harry to truly get back in with the RF-work hard and keep quiet-but I think that’s unlikely.

As others have said, that’s part of the issue with H&M, they seem to think that they can be insta-Royalty without putting in the work. She refused to accept advice and gave up on royal life after 19 months; now they’ve been in the US for a few years and haven’t found their niches yet…but it can take years to settle into a new country and most immigrants don’t alienate their family and old friends back home.
Most people don’t instantly settle into a new culture, it takes time to work out where you fit in.

thecrossIambearing · 01/09/2024 15:50

Lifestooshort71 · 01/09/2024 15:06

I don't believe he wants to be back with Meghan and the children, surely he wants to come and go to family stuff and parties and royal events as and when? The US will always be his home (unless they divorce and even then the children will still be there), but a rapprochement between him and his father and brother would allow him more freedom of movement between the US and the UK. How his security detail would work though is anybody's guess! So, I don't think he wants back in to The Firm but he's fed up with being an outcast from the family and his friends. As my gran used to say - I want doesn't get.

Yip he's got FOMO !

LadyGilley · 01/09/2024 15:50

Hughs · 01/09/2024 15:43

Yet Harry was brought up in a uniquely fucked up situation ... and yet he gets a roasting for how he turned out.

You seem angry and to have taken this quite personally and I'm not sure what rape victims have got to do with it, but I'm merely pointing out that this is not true. He wasn't brought up in a uniquely fucked up situation, he has a brother, only two years older, who not only lost his mother as a child, but had the responsibility of being her confidant and emotional support before she died. And also has the responsibility of being monarch one day, aka "trapped" as Harry himself describes it. Of course people process trauma differently but the fucked up situation itself is not unique. I don't think it's "scathing" to point that out.

For goodness sake, as I said in my post, there is no AA group for something like he has been through. I've been through unusual trauma. I know how important it is to have support groups of people who have gone through what you have and what its like when those groups don't exist. Harry doesn't have this. I can empathise with that.

Saying ' oh his brother did too' does not stop it from being a unique experience. He's lived a very unusual life. If you don't think being born into a royal family and having you mother killed in a car chase by journalists and still having to court the media for your ' job' that you were born into is not a unique experience, then I really don't know to say to you. Quibbling about him having a brother is just that. Massively misses the point.

Mylovelygreendress · 01/09/2024 15:51

LadyGilley · 01/09/2024 15:45

I don't think children should be born into a public role, no. Its a high pressure life that people should have to choose, not be born into. Charles has also been a notoriously miserable character, miserable and frustrated with the life he was born into. One of the Queen's sisters was an alcoholic who was refused permission to marry the man she loved. Charles and Diana happened as he has to marry a virgin, so ended up with a woman he did not love. Grieving and traumatised children were forced to walk behind their mother's coffin in front of a mass of wailing strangers. What sort of family makes kids do that?

Its cruel to birth generation after generation into that circus.

Where to start …..
The late Queen had only one sister , Margaret . She
could have married Peter Townsend however she wasn’t prepared to give up her Royal status so decided not to marry him.

Mylovelygreendress · 01/09/2024 15:53

Apologies @IcedPurple x post

LadyGilley · 01/09/2024 15:57

GorgeousTulips · 01/09/2024 15:38

Of course it's possible to acknowledge that his upbringing has contributed massively to how he's turned out. However, betraying your entire family, selling their private moments for money, embarrassing and humiliating his brother and father, and his grandmother who happened to be Queen, is just absolutely unforgivable. Then having the gall to expect to be welcomed back into the fold when the money runs out. It's beyond atrocious.

If I were his family I would not forgive them either. But that's not my point . My point is he is like that because of his traumatic background. Traumatised people are often very difficult people. I had a very short term relationship with someone with C-PTSD due to childhood trauma. He was very difficult because of that. Its not uncommon. I don't want to see that guy again but I don't go around slagging him either because I understand why he is like that.

Hughs · 01/09/2024 15:58

Saying ' oh his brother did too' does not stop it from being a unique experience.

Hmm, I disagree. Maybe that's quibbling but words do have meanings.

I agree his childhood was very unusual. But the point I was making in my original post was that it's not a convincing excuse for his behaviour when his brother manages to live his life without behaving in that way.

LadyGilley · 01/09/2024 15:59

Mylovelygreendress · 01/09/2024 15:51

Where to start …..
The late Queen had only one sister , Margaret . She
could have married Peter Townsend however she wasn’t prepared to give up her Royal status so decided not to marry him.

Yes, because saying ' you can marry him if you give up your job and the only life you have known' is not coercive at all. Just like women were allowed to be teachers in the past, but only if they never married. That was fair and not coercive too.

The way you ignored all the other points is noted.

IcedPurple · 01/09/2024 16:00

LadyGilley · 01/09/2024 15:57

If I were his family I would not forgive them either. But that's not my point . My point is he is like that because of his traumatic background. Traumatised people are often very difficult people. I had a very short term relationship with someone with C-PTSD due to childhood trauma. He was very difficult because of that. Its not uncommon. I don't want to see that guy again but I don't go around slagging him either because I understand why he is like that.

So what you're saying is that having a 'traumatic background' absolves you of responsibility for your own behaviour for the rest of your life? Even when you're 40 and a parent yourself? You get to enjoy victim status indefinitely?

BunnyLake · 01/09/2024 16:00

IcedPurple · 01/09/2024 15:09

I agree with all of that.

He's pretty much trapped, which is ironic given how he's described his brother's situation. His children are going to grow up in California so unless he wants to be that parent who only sees his kid a few times a year, that's where he will have to stay too. And he has very publicly given up everything for this marriage, so admitting to failure would be a huge humiliation for him. So this is his life now.

I also agree that they're completely different, with nothing in common other than their neuroses. However, I think they'll stick together at least for the moment, as they both have so much invested, financially and emotionally, in the marriage. Without him, she's frankly just another ageing D list actress. ARO, if it ever happens, isn't going to make serious money. But I'm not sure what options are left to either of them at this stage.

If they had any sense (which they don’t) their option should be to go live a quiet life away from the spotlight and quit trying to be superstars.

I don’t think Meghan can though, it’s been her ambition every day of her adult life to be someday feted and admired. She didn’t read the memo though that you need at the very least charisma if not talent to be admired. Even Wallis was feted for her dinner parties, hosting prowess, style and wit, this one can’t even manage that.

lyingonthebeach · 01/09/2024 16:02

Lorelaigilmore88 · 31/08/2024 23:02

I wish he would just bore off. I am sick to death of seeing/hearing about him.

Oh yes!

smilesy · 01/09/2024 16:02

LadyGilley · 01/09/2024 15:59

Yes, because saying ' you can marry him if you give up your job and the only life you have known' is not coercive at all. Just like women were allowed to be teachers in the past, but only if they never married. That was fair and not coercive too.

The way you ignored all the other points is noted.

She wasn’t asked to give up her job. She was asked to give up her place in the line of succession, which, given that the Queen already had heirs, was slipping down anyway. She decided in the end that actually she didn’t want to marry Townsend. Nobody made
her give him up

GorgeousTulips · 01/09/2024 16:03

LadyGilley · 01/09/2024 15:57

If I were his family I would not forgive them either. But that's not my point . My point is he is like that because of his traumatic background. Traumatised people are often very difficult people. I had a very short term relationship with someone with C-PTSD due to childhood trauma. He was very difficult because of that. Its not uncommon. I don't want to see that guy again but I don't go around slagging him either because I understand why he is like that.

There's a difference between being difficult and a complete snake in the grass with no empathy at all.

IcedPurple · 01/09/2024 16:03

LadyGilley · 01/09/2024 15:59

Yes, because saying ' you can marry him if you give up your job and the only life you have known' is not coercive at all. Just like women were allowed to be teachers in the past, but only if they never married. That was fair and not coercive too.

The way you ignored all the other points is noted.

Huh?

As I wrote in my post above, Margaret would have got to keep her titles and her place on the Civil List. The only thing she's have had to give up would have been her place in the LoS, which in practical terms meant very little.

The Queen actually went out of her way to try to accommodate Margaret's wishes, as recently revealed documents have shown. It was Margaret herself who eventually decided against the marriage as she had fallen out of love with Townsend. That may not suit your narrative, but it is the truth.

Hazeby · 01/09/2024 16:05

That the ‘media’ print this shite and that people read it and believe it is what’s caused all the trouble in the first place.

LadyGilley · 01/09/2024 16:06

IcedPurple · 01/09/2024 16:00

So what you're saying is that having a 'traumatic background' absolves you of responsibility for your own behaviour for the rest of your life? Even when you're 40 and a parent yourself? You get to enjoy victim status indefinitely?

What I am saying is exactly what I am said in the post. I won't go around slagging people acting out trauma, and that's how I see PH's behaviour.. I think threads spewing bile at him are really unpleasant and display a really unpleasant side of human nature. These threads make me think badly about the posters, not about PH.

Anyway, I'm off to make dinner..

IcedPurple · 01/09/2024 16:07

LadyGilley · 01/09/2024 16:06

What I am saying is exactly what I am said in the post. I won't go around slagging people acting out trauma, and that's how I see PH's behaviour.. I think threads spewing bile at him are really unpleasant and display a really unpleasant side of human nature. These threads make me think badly about the posters, not about PH.

Anyway, I'm off to make dinner..

But Harry repeatedly 'spewing bile' at his own family is fine?

Bcoz trauma?

Hughs · 01/09/2024 16:07

Yes, because saying ' you can marry him if you give up your job and the only life you have known' is not coercive at all.

I was wondering where on earth you get this sort of shite from while at the same time not knowing how many siblings the queen had, and then I realised - you've watched The Crown!

Spoiler alert - it wasn't like that. All Margaret had to give up was her place in the line of succession, which was pretty meaningless as the chances of her becoming queen were tiny by then. Here's an explanation of how the tv version is different from real life. Eden and the Queen were actually pretty sympathetic by all accounts.

^The Crown shows Prime Minister Sir Anthony Eden stressing the cabinet's opposition to the marriage and threatening the princess with exile for five years if she goes ahead.
The Queen tells her sister chillingly that if she marries Townsend she will no longer be a member of the family.
But in fact, papers available in the National Archives since 2004 show that the Queen and Eden drew up a plan in 1955 under which Princess Margaret could marry Townsend while keeping her royal title and her civil list allowance of £6,000 a year plus another £9,000 on marriage. She could live in this country and even continue with public duties if the public approved, as was highly likely.^

Hughs · 01/09/2024 16:10

I think threads spewing bile at him are really unpleasant and display a really unpleasant side of human nature. These threads make me think badly about the posters, not about PH.

Am I one of the posters you think badly about for spewing bile? I am a survivor of childhood trauma though, so presumably I'm ok again now in your eyes? Not my fault?

IcedPurple · 01/09/2024 16:15

Hughs · 01/09/2024 16:07

Yes, because saying ' you can marry him if you give up your job and the only life you have known' is not coercive at all.

I was wondering where on earth you get this sort of shite from while at the same time not knowing how many siblings the queen had, and then I realised - you've watched The Crown!

Spoiler alert - it wasn't like that. All Margaret had to give up was her place in the line of succession, which was pretty meaningless as the chances of her becoming queen were tiny by then. Here's an explanation of how the tv version is different from real life. Eden and the Queen were actually pretty sympathetic by all accounts.

^The Crown shows Prime Minister Sir Anthony Eden stressing the cabinet's opposition to the marriage and threatening the princess with exile for five years if she goes ahead.
The Queen tells her sister chillingly that if she marries Townsend she will no longer be a member of the family.
But in fact, papers available in the National Archives since 2004 show that the Queen and Eden drew up a plan in 1955 under which Princess Margaret could marry Townsend while keeping her royal title and her civil list allowance of £6,000 a year plus another £9,000 on marriage. She could live in this country and even continue with public duties if the public approved, as was highly likely.^

Yup! The Crown was my first thought too.

Peter Morgan has a lot to answer for.

I guess the story of a beautiful young princess denied permission to marry the love of her life by a cruel outdated institution made for better TV than the fact that Margaret simply grew out of her infatuation. Which is just as well, given that Townsend was a creep who later married a 19 year old.

Cesarina · 01/09/2024 16:17

MouldyCandy · 31/08/2024 23:36

I read recently (on MN or DM?) that on turning 40 - which is very soon - he inherits more from his Great Grandmother (late Queen's Mum). I don't think he is that short of cash.

Yes, it’s widely reported that when he’s 40, he will get around $8.5 million from a trust fund set up by his grandmother, Queen Elizabeth ll.
I can’t remember any details as to what he may have inherited from his mum Princess Diana.

Pineapplesandthegovernmentandpunkrock · 01/09/2024 16:17

Thanks @Hughs and @IcedPurple for debunking the Margaret myths.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.