Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Netflix deal, looking like it may be over for H&M

831 replies

Thedom · 20/08/2024 20:06

The rumours have been doing the rounds for a while, but Puck News now reporting it, which means it is very likely that their contract with Netflix will not be renewed.

"The streamer is not expected to renew its five-year, $100 million deal signed in 2020 with Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. Meghan’s passion project, the animated kids show Pearl, has already been canceled, and the unscripted cooking and polo offerings didn’t connect the way the royal couple’s Harry & Meghan did. "

puck.news/the-best-and-worst-deals-of-peak-tv-part-1/

Netflix deal,  looking like it may be over for H&M
Netflix deal,  looking like it may be over for H&M
OP posts:
Thread gallery
34
Twistybranch · 28/08/2024 16:33

Shes no Nigella for sure.

She would be at pains to tell us she doesn’t own a Meechro-wah-vey and wouldn’t know how to use one

CarmelaBrunella · 28/08/2024 16:38

When she was with that chef, she tried to get her own cooking show. She had a couple of trials, but wasn't deemed good enough.

TheStroppyFeminist · 28/08/2024 16:44

Thanks for the interesting article @Twistybranch

Nigella is super bright and was a journalist before she did food shows. I agree, Meghan doesn't have what it takes to do cookery shows at all.

CarmelaBrunella · 28/08/2024 16:48

TheStroppyFeminist · 28/08/2024 16:44

Thanks for the interesting article @Twistybranch

Nigella is super bright and was a journalist before she did food shows. I agree, Meghan doesn't have what it takes to do cookery shows at all.

Not in the least!

Uricon2 · 28/08/2024 17:03

There are so many cookery shows out there that I think you have to have serious foodie chops and/or be likeable and/or bring something different to it. Being married to Harry is not sufficient qualification.

wordler · 28/08/2024 18:35

If she was able to make fun of herself a little and be genuinely lighthearted about life she could do something like Jennifer Garner and her 'pretend cooking show' on Instagram - it's funny, clearly merching stuff sometimes (she's a KitchenAid ambassador) but it's cheesy in a fun way and sometimes the recipes do look pretty good. You can tell that she actually does cook for her kids on a regular basis.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/C6wWMRqRUX9/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link&igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==

Instagram

https://www.instagram.com/reel/C6wWMRqRUX9?igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA%3D%3D

Twistybranch · 28/08/2024 19:01

She will want to copy the barefoot contessa and become the barefoot Duchess. Same vibes.

Ina always has friends round, and makes something ‘fabulous’ and always decorates a lovely table. She also does a bit of flower arranging at her gorgeous Hamptons home.

I think this is what she will try. But Ina had a famous deli in NY for a long time, she eats and breathes food.

Similar to the poster said above, Meghan doesn’t give that warm foodie comfort blanket that most of these cooks give.

Ree Drummond, she has a warm and inviting home and family in the middle of nowhere, so her recipes used to centre store cupboard essentials/freezer foods.

Girl meets farm, she is the most adorable and quirky young mum, who because of her background and where she lives, has all these different cultural influences and makes it so unique to watch.

Both these cooks are in the own kitchens. Ree has a gorgeous ranch kitchen and girl meets farm has a very small and very normal kitchen.

I can’t think what Meghans selling point will be?

Not in her own kitchen, cooking foods we know she doesn’t cook at home because they will have a chef.

The clue to that one is the Cut interview when it states that Meghan makes breakfast everyday. That’s because in these big houses, if you use one chef, they usually work lunch and dinner and either the occupants or the housekeeper will arrange breakfast. They're not usually used for breakfast.

LaMarschallin · 28/08/2024 19:32

So, eggs from the hens, avo toast, wheatgrass smoothies and steel-cut oats?
And jam.

Twistybranch · 28/08/2024 19:35

Lots and lots of jam

SonicTheHodgeheg · 28/08/2024 19:38

TheStroppyFeminist · 28/08/2024 16:44

Thanks for the interesting article @Twistybranch

Nigella is super bright and was a journalist before she did food shows. I agree, Meghan doesn't have what it takes to do cookery shows at all.

I think Harry could have been good on a cookery show if he was willing to be a bit silly and play on the prince in America angle eg he makes boxed Mac and cheese or has American guests demonstrate how to cook an American dish that he is unfamiliar with then eats with them.
This idea obviously depends on him playing the Harry that we used to know and accepting that the episodes would be set up so the audience laugh at him sometimes.

Vabenejulio · 28/08/2024 19:47

I think having a California-based Prince and Princess of the BRF would be a real reputational problem, if that Prince and that Princess aren’t devoted to and actively furthering the influence and brand of the British royal family and only the British royal family. And I don’t see how they could credibly be doing that if all their formative years are outside the U.K. Their very existence debases “Prince” and “Princess” of the BRF. What would that even mean?

(Look at Prince Albert of Monaco as an eg of European monarchy. Say what you will of his sisters and children and further-afield relatives: none of them have spoken ill of the golden goose, despite their troubles with relationships, substances, media, money. They may not all live in Monaco but they are openly and exclusively supportive of the Monegasque royal family by their actions and their words.)

I think either we will see huge efforts from Harry and Meghan to bring their children to the U.K. for education and assimilation (probably in the most PR-friendly ways such as Ascot, polo etc), or the children will have their titles removed.

They’ve been going for a thousand years. They know how to keep the brand strong. Harry and Meghan are not the way.

StiffyByngsDogBartholomew · 28/08/2024 20:04

BigWillyLittleTodger · 28/08/2024 13:13

I think William will remove the Prince and Princess titles from Archie and Lily, can you imagine how Meghan Harry will set them up as rivals to the Wales children when they are of age? William needs to stop that before it starts.

I think this would be constitutionally impossible.

StiffyByngsDogBartholomew · 28/08/2024 20:06

@Twistybranch i stand corrected !

I don't think he would do that

StiffyByngsDogBartholomew · 28/08/2024 20:26

I'd love to see a Kate cookery show. Favourite Weeknight Family Dinners from Anmer Hall. I'm fascinated by the question of how they live at home. Does Kate decide what they are eating ? Does the housekeeper do the Waitrose order ? If she fancies making rice Krispy cakes with George who clears it up ? This dates back to Charlotte at the Taylor Swift concert and I had a vision of Charlotte covering her floor with beads for friendship bracelets like Dd and who would have to clear it up ? I thought Kate would probably make Charlotte clear up her own mess ! And does Charlotte have Taylor Swift posters up in her room ?

it then got me to wondering if Kate knocks up a weeknight bolognese like the rest of us. And what their family life is like, homework wrangling, toys over the floor and all.

CarmelaBrunella · 28/08/2024 20:35

I remember Kate saying how excited George was when he was little, when the supermarket order came and he liked to help unpack it. I think they've all been encouraged to cook, and certainly bake.

coolmum123 · 28/08/2024 20:44

AutumnCrow · 27/08/2024 12:10

Just pondering on the horrendous breach of William's privacy (re: genitals) by Harry in Spare: given that William's a living data subject, and Harry reveals personal data and sensitive data without the data subject's content, how the hell is this not a breach of GDPR in the UK and the EU? This isn't 'silly gossip' or 'alleged rumour' - it's medical information that Harry knows due to his privileged position, and which he and the publisher released unfairly and without permission as part of a attempted hatchet job on a public figure.

Regardless, can you imagine being (e.g.) a blog writer and publishing a piece that discussed the genitals of, say, your sister, who you named and clearly identified, without seeking her permission first. How does a free-for-all culture of breaching the privacy of family members' genitalia possibly support Harry's supposed quest to improve online safety for children. It's all about fucking boundaries, Harry.

I recall seeing an interview with Camilla Tomney talking about this and she said if she had written an article with the stuff Harry had put in Spare, the lawyers would not have allowed it to be published

CarmelaBrunella · 28/08/2024 20:46

@coolmum123 - very interesting, and it just shows you how far Harry crossed the line.

Treesinmygarden · 28/08/2024 21:07

LimeBiscuit · 27/08/2024 13:59

No such thing as he can’t and shouldn’t.

He clearly can and did. It was something done to him when he was unable to give consent to it as well. This is a topic that rears itself periodically in real life where the practice is to circumcise and people question it. So yes, knowing the royal babies have this done is something that we now know to be true.

What business is that of yours or anyone else's?

Gorgonemilezola · 28/08/2024 21:17

StiffyByngsDogBartholomew I get the feeling they're bringing their family up as close to 'normal' as possible and that includes tidying up after themselves and cooking together.

GorgeousTulips · 28/08/2024 22:10

Gorgonemilezola · 28/08/2024 21:17

StiffyByngsDogBartholomew I get the feeling they're bringing their family up as close to 'normal' as possible and that includes tidying up after themselves and cooking together.

Eh? How do you have a clue whether they cook for themselves or tidy away?

Gorgonemilezola · 28/08/2024 22:59

It's an opinion, conclusion, impression, speculation. It's allowed. If it wasn't, t'internet would probably fold overnight. And your own posts suggest you comment on stuff you don't have a clue about either. Fun, isn't it.......

AutumnCrow · 28/08/2024 23:24

BigWillyLittleTodger · 28/08/2024 14:29

The Prince title can be removed by the Monarch, the Duke title has to go through parliament.

According to this fascinating legal opinion, posted a bit earlier by @Twistybranch, written by Middle Temple Master Graham Zellick KC, not necessarily.

It's a royal prerogative thing.

Charles probably won't fancy enduring the tantrum from 'litigious Harry'; but William might be up for it, if he's advised that Harry's case would be unburdened by any prospects of success. I think William's probably pretty good at 'grey rock' and focusing on the things that matter.

https://middletemplar.org.uk/to-strip-or-not-to-strip-prince-harrys-titles/

To Strip or Not to Strip Prince Harry's Titles | Middle Templar Magazine

Amidst the clamour for the Duke of Sussex to be stripped of his titles, Master Graham Zellick examines Prince Harry’s various titles – prince, duke, HRH. He analyses if and how they might be removed and the wisdom and likelihood of this being done, que...

https://middletemplar.org.uk/to-strip-or-not-to-strip-prince-harrys-titles

QueenOfHertz · 28/08/2024 23:44

It’s been said before that Kate & Will cook the evening meal and Willa makes a good spag bog.

elessar · 29/08/2024 00:16

AutumnCrow · 28/08/2024 12:33

Also I think William was likely thrust into the role of 'my brother's keeper' during their teen years and early 20s as Harry by his own account was unstable.

It interests me that Harry would rather be seen as unstable than dimwitted. Around about the 20 years of age mark was when he really started hating the press (all of it, not just 'the tabloids') because he kept engaging with them, and they printed what he said, and some of it looked terrible, and so he hated the press, and he's been going round and round and up and down like Sisyphus ever since.

Instead, he could have worked with the royal family's press office to come up with a simply strategy of 'no commenting' when, say, asked about Chelsy Davey. 'I will not comment on private matters nor will I comment on a private citizen.'

Rather than do this, he fired off some really awful, stupid responses, the most infamous of which is, 'She's not black or anything, you know.'

(I'm quoting that, btw, from an archived Guardian article by Ben Summerskill (Jan 2005), not a 'tabloid'. It's really gossipy article and a bit of a weird read, given the passage of time, but I think Summerskill's quote is accurate.)

https://www.theguardian.com/g2/story/0,,1383309,00.html

@AutumnCrow I'd never heard of that quote from Harry before - "she's not black or anything you know".

I'm actually shocked (although given some of his other comments on record I shouldn't be.) But I mean, how can he explain that away? How can his supporters explain a comment like that away?!

AutumnCrow · 29/08/2024 00:57

elessar · 29/08/2024 00:16

@AutumnCrow I'd never heard of that quote from Harry before - "she's not black or anything you know".

I'm actually shocked (although given some of his other comments on record I shouldn't be.) But I mean, how can he explain that away? How can his supporters explain a comment like that away?!

I think it's part of the whole raft of behaviours that he now puts down to 'unconscious bias' which Meghan has supposedly cured him of, or some such Hollywood narrative about her making him a better man. 'Yes I've changed, and I'm glad I've changed', yada yada.

But he hasn't changed at all. He's still the same, and it's actually much more obvious now.

Swipe left for the next trending thread