Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Meghan and Harry spotted out and about - ¡Viva Colombia! Edition (Part 7)

1000 replies

skullbabe · 19/08/2024 09:09

Welcome to Part 7 of our positive threads, where we explore all things Meghan and Harry. From the causes they champion and their business ventures to Meghan’s (and occasionally Harry’s 😉) fashion moments, there’s a lot to chat about. This is a drama-free space, so let’s keep it upbeat! High five to @queentim for the original inspiration.

Meghan and Harry spotted out and about - ¡Viva Colombia! Edition (Part 7)
OP posts:
Thread gallery
96
Runnerinthenight · 04/10/2024 18:47

Spectre8 · 04/10/2024 18:40

Hahaha this entire board perpetuates silly gossip all the time

What insider knowledge do peollw have when they make nasty comments about H&M as though they know what they are thinking and doing ...it's just speculation and completely made up too

And we can see how little work William does and has done compared tp the other royal since the number fo engagements they do is published. And noone can say anything about work done in private since noone knows own so all we can definitely say is based on what is publicly available.

Many of the posters on this board are excellent analysts. Thankfully the vast majority don't sit posting meaningless, sycophantic accolades that bear absolutely no relation to reality.

I'd be embarrassed to write similar shit about William, and I have a lot more time for him than I do for Harry nowadays. He pissed all the goodwill into the wind!

Spectre8 · 04/10/2024 18:48

MagdaLenor · 04/10/2024 17:35

Could have said no?
Harry and Meghan could have said no to all the millions that came their way. Didn't. Funny that.

They have, they left!

You know the monarchy had the law changed so they never pay inheritance tax? Tax that could help improve the services of their subjects but oh no they must keep their wealth for themselves. You okay about that? You think that's perfectly okay?

IcedPurple · 04/10/2024 18:50

Spectre8 · 04/10/2024 18:45

Profits of the crown estate 🙄 duh

What's with the 'duh'? Your posts are difficult to read because of all the typos and incoherence, so it wasn't at all clear that you were talking about the Crown Estate.

The 'profits' go to the Treasury so what's the issue?

smilesy · 04/10/2024 18:54

Spectre8 · 04/10/2024 18:40

Hahaha this entire board perpetuates silly gossip all the time

What insider knowledge do peollw have when they make nasty comments about H&M as though they know what they are thinking and doing ...it's just speculation and completely made up too

And we can see how little work William does and has done compared tp the other royal since the number fo engagements they do is published. And noone can say anything about work done in private since noone knows own so all we can definitely say is based on what is publicly available.

Not all engagements are posted on the court circular. It’s not compulsory and some prefer not to put everything on so that proves nothing. And by your logic that “we don’t know what other work the royals carry out”, William could be doing a lot more work than we know 🤷‍♀️

Runnerinthenight · 04/10/2024 18:58

Spectre8 · 04/10/2024 18:48

They have, they left!

You know the monarchy had the law changed so they never pay inheritance tax? Tax that could help improve the services of their subjects but oh no they must keep their wealth for themselves. You okay about that? You think that's perfectly okay?

They left because all that wealth just wasn't enough for this avaricious pair! They thought they could more by selling off their royal status to the highest bidder!

They most certainly did NOT do it for any altruistic reason!!

Spectre8 · 04/10/2024 19:06

Runnerinthenight · 04/10/2024 18:58

They left because all that wealth just wasn't enough for this avaricious pair! They thought they could more by selling off their royal status to the highest bidder!

They most certainly did NOT do it for any altruistic reason!!

He has said in his own words.

Harry said. "To still perform and work and support and represent the monarchy, but to be financially independent, to remove the supposed public interest, which the tabloids had used repeatedly to invade every single element of our life."

Financially independent does not equate to all that wealth wasn't enough.

Mylovelygreendress · 04/10/2024 19:08

Spectre8 · 04/10/2024 19:06

He has said in his own words.

Harry said. "To still perform and work and support and represent the monarchy, but to be financially independent, to remove the supposed public interest, which the tabloids had used repeatedly to invade every single element of our life."

Financially independent does not equate to all that wealth wasn't enough.

BUT he wanted 24/7 taxpayer funded security . How is that being financially independent?

IcedPurple · 04/10/2024 19:10

Mylovelygreendress · 04/10/2024 19:08

BUT he wanted 24/7 taxpayer funded security . How is that being financially independent?

And who was going to pay for private or first class air travel from California to Britain for their 'royal engagements'? The British taxpayer?

Runnerinthenight · 04/10/2024 19:11

Spectre8 · 04/10/2024 19:06

He has said in his own words.

Harry said. "To still perform and work and support and represent the monarchy, but to be financially independent, to remove the supposed public interest, which the tabloids had used repeatedly to invade every single element of our life."

Financially independent does not equate to all that wealth wasn't enough.

He's told plenty of lies and spouted plenty of bullshit, and that's right up there with the best!

Anyway it's not possible to represent the monarchy AND be financially independent. The Queen told them nearly 5 years ago.

Well I think all that wealth would be sufficient for most people, and more than, but it wasn't for them. She couldn't give a shiny shit about representing the monarchy - sure she won't even set foot in the country!!

MyLongTenureIsBiggerThanYours · 04/10/2024 19:14
Cracking Up Lol GIF by reactionseditor

To still perform and work and support and represent the monarchy

smilesy · 04/10/2024 19:20

Harry said. "To still perform and work and support and represent the monarchy

Whilst living in the US? Represent the monarch where and how? They were never going to come over to cut ribbons or unveil plaques or visit communities. What was this “representation “ going to look like?

Runnerinthenight · 04/10/2024 19:21

Hardly "supporting" the monarchy by publicly attacking its members!

Spectre8 · 04/10/2024 19:22

IcedPurple · 04/10/2024 19:10

And who was going to pay for private or first class air travel from California to Britain for their 'royal engagements'? The British taxpayer?

Well the monarchy receives the sovereign grant to cover all costs associated with their royal duties 🙄 so any royal undertaking royal duties will have any costs associated for it covered by that money. So if they were working royals undertaking royal duties then the same rules apply.

MyLongTenureIsBiggerThanYours · 04/10/2024 19:23

Harry.

Supporting the monarchy like a man’s vest would support tiny tits on a mouse.

smilesy · 04/10/2024 19:27

Spectre8 · 04/10/2024 19:22

Well the monarchy receives the sovereign grant to cover all costs associated with their royal duties 🙄 so any royal undertaking royal duties will have any costs associated for it covered by that money. So if they were working royals undertaking royal duties then the same rules apply.

What Royal duties would they undertake if they were not living in the Uk?

IcedPurple · 04/10/2024 19:27

Spectre8 · 04/10/2024 19:22

Well the monarchy receives the sovereign grant to cover all costs associated with their royal duties 🙄 so any royal undertaking royal duties will have any costs associated for it covered by that money. So if they were working royals undertaking royal duties then the same rules apply.

But they wouldn't be 'working royals' if they were living in California making money off their royal connections. The whole idea was idiotic and a complete non starter.

But anyway I thought Harry was all about sustainable travel? What would Travalyst say about someone flying across the Atlantic to attend a 'charity event'?

Hughs · 04/10/2024 19:31

More intelligent. Really? Let's not go back to A levels please! Who knows

Hard to argue with ABC vs B (with the help of his teacher) D but ok.

Better educated. See above.

William has a degree, Harry has BD at A level.

Better looking. That's all a matter of taste

True.

Taller. That's so so funny to imagine the difference of 1 inch when you're over 6' anyway, is an attribute? Seriously?!

I included that because rumour has it that it bothers Harry to the point where he started to wear lifts in his shoes, poor dab, so fragile 🤦‍♀️

Hughs · 04/10/2024 19:37

Your first mistake is believing that a university education is the only sign of intelligence.

I don't think university education is the only sign of intelligence. I do think it's sign of education though, hence William is better educated than Harry, having completed a higher education course.

A levels are an ok measure of intelligence, used by many. Plus there is Harry's obvious stupidity that comes out every now and then, eg "my children are not on social media". What a guy 🤦‍♀️

Bontonbonbon · 04/10/2024 19:39

@Spectre8 By that logic they’d only get security when undertaking royal duties. Which is what they were offered and turned down. Harry wants 24/7 security and half in/ half out. He can’t have both.

FYI- your understanding of U.K. inheritance law and the history of the privy purse is extremely poor. The RF didn’t change the law. It’s quite complex but it came down to the monarch not being taxed on inheritance because that money is being used to support their work as head of state.

The Sovereign grant replaced the Civil List and is very much reduced. It now only supports working members of the central family to complete duties and the upkeep of buildings used for state duties. So Balmoral and Buckingham palace but not Sandringham.

No one in the RF has an estate that is paid for by the Sovereign Grant that they keep as a private home. Those who undertake royal duties often have a work facing address in Windsor or Kensington Palace and a private home that is run to support itself.

The only exception to this rule is Andrew. Hence the issues with Royal Lodge and the King attempting to move him to a smaller Grace and favour apartment. It needs repairs and that can’t be done from the Sovereign Grant because he isn’t a working royal.

Having M&H as half working royals who had a fully paid for house and security would go against all the cost cutting and modernisation of recent decades. The family couldn’t justify it. No one else has that deal. And M&H just weren’t good enough at the job to make it an irresistible prospect to anyone- least of all the government who’d had to deal with their embarrassing behaviour on tour.

Anyone who thinks that the U.K. government (especially a Labour one) would welcome four extra royals who want everything paid for in return for half the work is gaga. Not going to happen. The king is not the only one who has to approve this. I suspect Keir Starmer would also say no.

MagdaLenor · 04/10/2024 19:44

Spectre8 · 04/10/2024 18:48

They have, they left!

You know the monarchy had the law changed so they never pay inheritance tax? Tax that could help improve the services of their subjects but oh no they must keep their wealth for themselves. You okay about that? You think that's perfectly okay?

I'm not ok with people who benefit to the tune of millions from the UK taxpayer, then go away to make money for themselves, yet still expect the UK taxpayer to pay for their wants, including court cases.
How hypocritical and entitled.

MagdaLenor · 04/10/2024 19:46

IcedPurple · 04/10/2024 19:27

But they wouldn't be 'working royals' if they were living in California making money off their royal connections. The whole idea was idiotic and a complete non starter.

But anyway I thought Harry was all about sustainable travel? What would Travalyst say about someone flying across the Atlantic to attend a 'charity event'?

No, he's all about talking about sustainable travel. For others.

MagdaLenor · 04/10/2024 19:48

Runnerinthenight · 04/10/2024 19:21

Hardly "supporting" the monarchy by publicly attacking its members!

With support like that, who needs enemies 😂!

Serenster · 04/10/2024 19:48

Spectre8 · 04/10/2024 19:06

He has said in his own words.

Harry said. "To still perform and work and support and represent the monarchy, but to be financially independent, to remove the supposed public interest, which the tabloids had used repeatedly to invade every single element of our life."

Financially independent does not equate to all that wealth wasn't enough.

You missed this bit out from Meghan and Harry’s manifesto , funnily enough, which is where they made their motivation (to earn money) perfectly clear

Do The Duke and Duchess of Sussex earn income?
No, under the current structure and financing arrangements, they are prohibited from earning any income in any form.
As they step back as senior members of the Royal Family and no longer receive funding through the Sovereign Grant, they will become members of the Royal Family with financial independence which is something they look forward to.
In addition, they value the ability to earn a professional income, which in the current structure they are prohibited from doing. For this reason they have made the choice to become members of the Royal Family with financial independence

MagdaLenor · 04/10/2024 19:49

@Bontonbonbon - thanks for your clarification of tax and the privy purse.

Hughs · 04/10/2024 19:51

Thankfully H moves in a very different world now. His efforts are constantly rewarded and lauded. His USA life is so much more than he could have wished for.

@Triplesec wtf are you going to do if H+M split up and be comes back to the UK as a non-working royal like Andrew? Better start working on that script..

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.