Condo King

[ConstantGarden1]

If true, interesting to see that our King remains flush. 😊

https://www.businessinsider.com/king-charles-canada-consulate-buy-nyc-apartment-billionaires-row-2024-7

He is worth a mint privately but we’ll never know how much he will leave (outside of Monarch to the first born future holder of all Kingly trappings by virtue of the throne) to his first born or his second son. The late Queen had four children and gifted Ann a fabulous house with beautiful grounds. I always thought how lovely that was. I suspect Harry will not be hard done by when it comes to being remembered in the will. His Dad loves him. Not sure I agree that the will should be sealed.

I have yet to make a crocheted doll but they look like fun! I definitely will not being doing a Harry or Meghan one. King Charles III, maybe. 😊

We all read it. And understood it. So what was funny?

What does crochet have to do with Charles and a condo he didn’t buy? Isn’t that a derail?

Hard to derail a thread that wasn’t on the rails in the first place because the OP doesn’t understand her own subject matter.

Agreed. I was just musing on whether crochet is a permissible meander when other things don’t seem to be 😆

Well crocheting a percentage princess is perfect for the beginners.

#thanksOzempic

I’ve found next project OP - you can thank me later 😊

Got it.

😂

Well it’s the crafty equivalent of tying yourself in knots, so on this thread, probably right on topic 😉

😊

My minute is up. Time to hit the yarn.

when you realise your claw has malfunctioned on ‘the world stage’

It really wasn't!

Maybe stick to the crochet...

Is this a uterus and ovary ? 😂

Yes. But it was the nearest in crochet that I could get to a malfunctioning claw. 🤷🏽‍♀️

That is brilliant! I want it!

Maybe it is apt? A woman's attractions?

Catch people out who keep saying I don’t click on links? A rather good ruse to reveal them. Perhaps, address the post itself which is cleverly worded. Clearly, @ConstantGarden1 is good at recognising the tactics deployed here to put people down. By the way excellent Invictus post too @ConstantGarden1.

Nasty. You like to repeat the claw put down applied to Meghan. No wonder the tit for tat goes on regarding the two Duchesses.

I’m afraid it’s constantgardner that’s been caught out with your post.

But how does it catch them out? The OP tries to give the impression that Charles has bought a flat in NY, although the Business Insider link clearly describes the situation. So the OP is trying (not successfully) to lie in order to catch out other posters who may be wary about pressing on links. How does that reflect badly in them and not the OP? And the Business Insider is not a controversial publication, so why wouldn’t people click on it?

Does not understand the difference between Celebitchy and BusinessInsider.

I don’t know about anyone else but I don’t have time to click on all the copious links that are posted.

Especially when it is about someone I don’t care for. And worse, when as milkshake says, it is at best disingenuous or worse, a way of spreading misinformation - more so when a lot on here plant a lie seed and let it grow.

The claw thing is a thing though. I have never, in all my years, seen a grown woman continually claw, grip, grasp or grab at their partner like that.

An attention seeking child might do it. Not a supposedly grown, independent, strong woman.

It isn’t about affection. It is about control.

As it is, I don’t care for the opinion of those who hold liars and manipulative misery spreaders in such high esteem.

You can take that how you like.

Jump on a yacht and sail on by cherub.