Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

WeAreInvictus - X

1000 replies

ConstantGarden1 · 13/07/2024 17:04

A fitting endorsement from Fred Hargreaves OBE who on X wrote, “As ever, a genuine and heart-felt speech from the Duke of Sussex - the driving force and passion behind the #InvictusGames. So good to see this Award, and share the stage with Elizabeth, Kirsty and Israel.”

From the Royal Website, how the ‘driving force’ - Harry - brought Invictus into being:

https://www.royal.uk/invictus-games

Positive Harry posts have been flooding X. Haters were out too. Some negatively posting in a quasi-forensic manner. No ‘gotcha’ revelations, however, nor tens of thousands of likes which the repost of Harry’s speech on ESPN by the knowledgeable Robert Griffin III now has. In less than 2 days 51+K likes and still rising.

I also checked out some (too many) #Sussexsquad posters. It revealed teachers, veterans, different nationalities, colours, creeds, nurses, retired folk etc etc. Thus I formed a completely different understanding about the use of the hashtag to support the Sussex family. There were also very strange users of the hashtag too. The hashtag was additionally utilised to send the message out on X to put the anti-Harry and Meghan posters or ‘derangers’, as they are often called, on mute and not to engage. Quite a restrained and civil position to promote and many did just that. Invictus awareness was successfully brought to those who had never heard of the international fraternity of veterans with disabilities and injuries by this hashtag alone.

Watching the videos on X I saw Harry speak with sincerity and humility under pressure. His words, “The truth is, I stand here not as Prince Harry, Pat Tillman Award recipient, but rather a voice on behalf of the Invictus Games Foundation and the thousands of veterans and service personnel from over 20 nations who have made the Invictus Games a reality. This award belongs to them. Not to me.”

Harry has now been awarded, by a very diverse online presence, a new respect. And I do believe he’s also a jolly good fellow…and so say many, many, many of us. 😊💙

I am so glad I went on my very new X twitter account for I was disgusted with the Daily Mail’s use of Pat Tillman’s mother to denigrate Prince Harry as it was totally uncalled for. Call it for what it was - a hit piece of journalism designed to create a mini storm online. We know nothing about the context of how they obtained words supposedly said by Pat’s mother about Harrry. I was aghast too at how Pat’s widow has also been treated by some online posters. Her foundation may not be perfect but she does more than anyone to honour him. Pat’s mother also did not go on any mainstream American media either where her complaints would have been listened to and would have provided the much needed context for the hate motivated article by a newspaper under the spotlight for its nefarious journalism and click bait articles about Harry.

Harry’s response was beautiful. The way Harry acknowledged Pat’s mother went further than him being a royal. It was a standout out moment of what being human is all about. I do believe he’s also a jolly good fellow…and so say many, many, many of us. 😊💙

WeAreInvictus - X
OP posts:
Thread gallery
57
Puzzledandpissedoff · 20/07/2024 22:38

... the related party note merely shows that PH was not reimbursed for any expenses, nor was he paid any fees for attending. It does not, however, tell us whether the Charity paid for any of their expenses directly (therefore no reimbursement needed)

Thanks for the link, @RockaLock; a classic case, I'd say of the devil being in the (undisclosed) detail

As said above this is no different to what any other charity has to produce, but there are just too many loopholes is why I'd prefer them all to have to disclose more detail - though I won't hold my breath

RockaLock · 20/07/2024 22:41

RockaLock · 20/07/2024 22:22

Well, there is further information in the stat accounts - just not as much as we would like to see!

But rarely occasionally you can glean some good titbits from stat accounts, so it's worth a look.

(For full disclosure, I am an accountant currently working for a charity with a senior royal as our Patron. I am not by any means a fan of H&M, but I try to be fair when judging them).

Sorry, @MummyJ12, I've just read that back - I wasn't meaning to imply that you weren't being fair to H&M! I'm generally a lurker on these threads, and have always thought that your posts are very balanced!

Rhaidimiddim · 20/07/2024 22:48

RockaLock · 20/07/2024 21:11

The financial summary that has been posted up thread is one that is produced from a charity's annual return, and never shows very much detail (this is common to all England and Wales charities, it's not Invictus trying to be shady).

If you want to look more closely into the finances of Invictus, then you need to click on "accounts and annual returns" on the CC website and download the latest version. There is a full set of Charity Accounts there.

I have attached a screenshot of Note 17, related party transactions. Of course, we still don't know what expenses, if any, were paid directly by the Charity (and therefore no reimbursement required), though.

As someone else has pointed out somewhere, Harry is not a Trustee, he is Patron. Do the accounts similarly specify that the Patron was paid nowt? Because, if not, that looks like an instance of the fingerpost.
Fat finger edits.

MummyJ12 · 20/07/2024 22:49

Thanks so much @RockaLock 😊.

Rhaidimiddim · 20/07/2024 22:53

RockaLock · 20/07/2024 22:01

I was just pointing out that Invictus have filed a full set of accounts, which give as much detail as any other set of statutory accounts for charities of a similar size 🤷‍♀️

I haven't waded through the Trustees' report, because they are always interminably dull, but if you did you might (or might not) find some explanation as to why the costs of delivering their charitable activities have increased - that sort of thing is generally covered if the yoy change is large, but as I say, I haven't bothered to read this one.

And as I said, the related party note merely shows that PH was not reimbursed for any expenses, nor was he paid any fees for attending. It does not, however, tell us whether the Charity paid for any of their expenses directly (therefore no reimbursement needed). Unfortunately you will never find this amount of detail in any set of statutory accounts, as much as we would all like to know how much Invictus have shelled out for PH&M to attend.

Posted in error

Vespanest · 20/07/2024 23:11

The accounts would never be able to give the full picture as the Invictus charity is only a small piece of the income involved in the games.

DeftLemonDog · 21/07/2024 08:00

ConstantGarden1 · 20/07/2024 18:42

I refer my honourable commenter to the letter he wrote.

😂😂

sometimes this thread reminds me of Swifties vs vs Beyhive on Twitter and just about as mature.

And other times I get to almost pee myself from laughing at the short witty responses.

‘I refer my honorouble commenter’
😂

Gorgonemilezola · 21/07/2024 09:36

I know. Global Harry. Arf.

MummyJ12 · 21/07/2024 10:37

Gorgonemilezola · 21/07/2024 09:36

I know. Global Harry. Arf.

Global Harry was a good one! 😂

AliceOlive · 21/07/2024 12:00

MummyJ12 · 21/07/2024 10:37

Global Harry was a good one! 😂

It’s “The Global Harry” or maybe “Global The Harry”. 😂

MummyJ12 · 21/07/2024 12:10

😂😂😂 ooh it’s tricky to decide which is the best one @AliceOlive!

AutumnCrow · 21/07/2024 12:12

Harry Thee Global Stallion

AliceOlive · 21/07/2024 12:14

AutumnCrow · 21/07/2024 12:12

Harry Thee Global Stallion

😂

FloofPaws · 21/07/2024 12:29

Just saw this on X ... 😂

WeAreInvictus - X
DelectableMe · 21/07/2024 12:30

FloofPaws · 21/07/2024 12:29

Just saw this on X ... 😂

😂😂
So true!

PrincessMee · 21/07/2024 12:31

AutumnCrow · 21/07/2024 12:12

Harry Thee Global Stallion

😂😂😂👏👏👏

MummyJ12 · 21/07/2024 12:32

AutumnCrow · 21/07/2024 12:12

Harry Thee Global Stallion

Hilarious 🤣

DelectableMe · 21/07/2024 12:33

AutumnCrow · 21/07/2024 12:12

Harry Thee Global Stallion

😂

PrincessMee · 21/07/2024 12:39

AutumnCrow · 21/07/2024 12:12

Harry Thee Global Stallion

This is better than Camilla in the telephone box. I am proud to present you with comment of the day. 🥇

StormzyinaTCup · 21/07/2024 12:56

@AutumnCrow 😂

Uricon2 · 21/07/2024 13:41

I'm liking

Maverick Harry Thee Global Stallion.

PS @AutumnCrow and @PrincessMee I think you both win the Internet today. That or a Living Legends of Aviation award, if you fancy one.

AliceOlive · 21/07/2024 13:43

How about

Award-winning Maverick Harry Thee Global Stallion?

smilesy · 21/07/2024 13:48

AliceOlive · 21/07/2024 13:43

How about

Award-winning Maverick Harry Thee Global Stallion?

Award winning Maverick Harry and Meghan Thee Global Stallion. Too much 🤔😂😂

misses out a word 😂

OP posts:
AliceOlive · 21/07/2024 13:52

Harry looks like he’s not well in that photo.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread