The New Yorker article Moehringer wrote about the process describes him shouting at Harry to convince him to leave out an "inane" insult he was demanding go into the book
It's obvious Harry has no friends now, no one to give him advice. Someone should have said to him that the book would destroy his relationship with his family, that he would end up looking foolish and weird with his anecdotes about putting his Mum's favourite moisturiser on his frozen penis.
He's as pathetic a figure as Edward VIII, slowing fading into obscurity, puffed up with his imagined self-importance and obsessed with what might have been.
I've never read Spare - I was determined not to put any money in H's pocket, but also, I thought I'd end up throwing the book across the room! Just listening to Harry blathering on with his shallow psychobabble on TV or in press interviews is enough to make me run for the hills. But I've read plenty of excerpts online, and on MN, and it hasn't changed my opinion. I agree that the ghost writer must have really earned his fee, dealing with H.
To anyone STILL whining 'Why are you so interested in people you don't know?', good grief - if you're at all interested in history, people, psychology etc then H & M really are the gift that keeps on giving. And the parallels with the D and Dss of Windsor are interesting: 2 people who've sold us a fairytale love story and now feel they have to keep up the pretence - at least for a few more years; the clever (or at least, crafty) woman who's stuck with a dim and annoying man, and the rather pathetic situation of a former royal in exile, desperately trying to cling to his former status without the PR help (and money) he once took for granted.
I can't read badly-written books - I just can't. I can't focus on what's being said because the way it's being said obtrudes all the time. From what other posters have said upthread, I just know this is what Spare would be like (those short, jerky non-sentences etc). Aaaarrrgghhh! But I don't blame Moehringer - it must have been a very trying commission.
Incidentally, there's a really good YouTube talk by Dr Raj Persaud about why H's therapy isn't helping. Persaud believes it's largely because his therapists are afraid to be honest or rigorous with Harry - partly out of deference and partly (of course!) out of a wish to keep him in therapy. And I suspect any professional psychologist who asked H the difficult, probing questions, or suggested that he might need to take some responsibility for his own situation wouldn't last very long.