Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Nigeria 2

1000 replies

OneHeartySnail · 10/05/2024 16:09

To continue the discussion.

I thought the comparison with the Duke snd Duchess of Windsor (last post on the previous thread) was interesting.

A visit to a dodgy regime, (Nazi Germany) because they would call Wallis HRH and make it a quasi-royal tour.

Of course, at that point Nazi Germany had a dodgy human rights record, but it was before the horrors of the Holocaust.

Let's face it, with the security and human rights issues there is no way the IG could happen in Nigeria. So that is sn excuse.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
68
MrsFinkelstein · 12/05/2024 09:23

There's been a few cringey moments from this personal PR tour (the lack of control with the press pack that's been visible is the most worrying to me, frankly).

But this really takes the biscuit.

H&M are being manipulated, but I am still not sure for what reason.

Why was the UK National Anthem being played? This is not a Royal tour? The Nigerian anthem was played after thus, which was entirely appropriate, the UKs should not.

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZGeCFnnta/

TikTok - Make Your Day

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZGeCFnnta

Inkanta · 12/05/2024 09:27

Mymilkshakebringsallthepapstomycar · 12/05/2024 09:21

The intensity of what?

Intense negativity.

Blinkeredsoul34 · 12/05/2024 09:29

LizzieBennett73 · 12/05/2024 09:14

I just feel a bit sad seeing all of this coverage, the media here in the UK are throwing much shade but it appears that Harry is getting the half in half out arrangement that he wanted to get. This is a Royal tour, whatever it is called - he is the son of the King. She parades her Duchess title like a dog with a sore paw yet hates everything about the establishment and what is expected of her....

I'm sorry Charles, but you should have dealt with this at the time and I'm starting to feel that these two are now loose cannons that are going to taint his Monarchy. I think they've seen an opportunity with Kate out of action for the considerable future and grabbed it. No wonder Charles refused to see him and his Netflix cameras.

I find the term “loose canon” rather problematic, the way it’s used on these boards anyway, implying that the British royal family and British establishment are the only people in the world allowed to dictate what charity work others can do or not. And that others somehow need their permission! It’s such a hide bound attitude.

The same term was applied to Diana when she took part in a campaign against land mines just before she died, when the charity said afterwards her efforts had made a significant difference in changing the laws and treaties governing their use.

There are all sorts of different ways to skin a cat! Not one organisation or family has a monopoly!

RedRosesPinkLilies · 12/05/2024 09:32

I’m one of those SAHM, had my own career, and gave it up for children etc.
Luckily my DH did make good money in his career and I didn’t have to go back to work.

I very much have my own identity, interests, friends. If I wasn’t now ill with a serious diagnosis I would be doing some kind of charity work. Point is I wouldn’t be existing in DH’s shadow, and he wouldn’t want me to be. It’s too insular to maintain a long term relationship that way. Marrying my DH is not my greatest achievement. (Don’t tell him)

With H & M, it does sometimes feel like that their brand is constantly being together. Maybe she is overwhelmed by it all, and it has affected her. She actually had a nice life before all this - minor celebrity, money, no one criticising her.

I guess I am annoyed at potentially being lumped into some trophy wife category. I am very much my own person, and made those choices with my husband

I feel it’s completely different with H&M, their brand is their partnership. In particular she seems to have lost her identity into his. Maybe the relationship would seem healthier to the outside world if they also had separate interests and goals. I know Meghan has done some cooking with other women - continuing that could have been a great thing.

Having written this, I am starting to feel sympathy for her. I completely disagree with the way they have behaved. But I guess it’s because they are immature in their outlook and understanding of others - and by their own actions they’ve just made their situation worse and worse. They’ve focussed on short term gain, rather than long term goals.

Serenster · 12/05/2024 09:33

There are all sorts of different ways to skin a cat! Not one organisation or family has a monopoly!

Of course there are. But I’d be interested to know what other charity workers conduct a military inspection when they visit a country not their own, or stand up for the playing of a national anthem of another country to the one they are visiting. Because that kind of activity seems quite linked to just a couple of organisations in general, really, and Meghan and Harry definitely aren’t In Nigeria in those capacities.

Noseyoldcow · 12/05/2024 09:33

I just knew she'd wear inappropriate, ill fitting, creased clothes, though I didn't anticipate just how flesh baring and disrespectful they'd be.
I also knew they'd both spout a load of bollocks, and they haven't disappointed there. Harry asking some poor chap about naming his false leg, and Meghan coming out with the usual role model guff.
As for lecturing regarding mental health, well this pair are bloody mental, so what's that all about?

Mymilkshakebringsallthepapstomycar · 12/05/2024 09:40

Blinkeredsoul34 · 12/05/2024 09:13

Her current status and the platforms she is afforded are purely based on her marriage

I disagree, as prior to marrying Harry she:

~worked with the youth empowerment nonprofit One Young World.

~worked for the UN’s Women’s Political Participation and Leadership initiative a for World Vision.

UN's Women’s Political Participation and Leadership

World Vision (About which she wrote an article for Time in 2017.)

I’m fairly neutral about M&H and don’t agree with everything they have done but I do think that’s a fairly impressive set of achievements when you are a full time actress and I bet it’s more than most keyboard warriors on here manage to achieve alongside their ft jobs!

Also, she is evidently trying to focus on their charity work in Nigeria, while all the news media reports and commentary on sm is about her clothes and her body which is misogynistic in the extreme.

All of these nasty threads about one woman who is not from a British culture, who was unhappy living in a different country to her own, and found a royal role restrictive, is just ridiculous.

I lived abroad for many years and came across lots of incidences where cross cultural marriages struggled and you can’t get more cross cultural than British RF v Californian actress, and that’s leaving out the race issue which I am certain was an important factor.

People may not like her but at least the things she has achieved were done as a result of her own energy and graft and not because she was born in to money and influence.

Meghan’s pre Harry “advocacy” has been discussed extensively on these threads. I think you need to do a little more research. Her full time job was and always had been self promotion. And the handful of tone deaf events you list were just that.

MummyJ12 · 12/05/2024 09:47

AnnieSF · 12/05/2024 05:15

Sussex Squad members in matching outfits greeting Harry and Meghan.

They look absolutely delighted to be with members of their Sussex Sewer Squad. 🙄
Matching outfits too, it’s like a cult.
They absolutely condone the vile behaviour don’t they? It’s sickening.

Mymilkshakebringsallthepapstomycar · 12/05/2024 09:47

Oh and Meghan was born to an Emmy award winning, very high salaried lighting director, says she grew up on set (very handy for an would be actress) and went to one of the best private schools in Hollywood. That’s money and influence straight off the bat that most of us are not born with.

MummyJ12 · 12/05/2024 09:49

YaMuvva · 12/05/2024 08:56

I’m really disappointed they’ve never denounced the Sussex Swuad due to their online bullying and behaviour of Kate and anyone who doesn’t agree with them. Harry and Meghan are bullies by proxy IMO

Yep. I agree.

Mymilkshakebringsallthepapstomycar · 12/05/2024 09:50

Inkanta · 12/05/2024 09:27

Intense negativity.

So you find only my posts negative and so keep quoting them. Ok. Why don’t you add something positive by way of discussion?

YaMuvva · 12/05/2024 09:58

Sorry but I’m sniggering at the assertion that she was ever well known for charity work. I’m not saying she didn’t do it but she’s able to go to Nigeria on a quasi-tour like this because she married Harry not because she was in Suits. It’s just obtuse to say otherwise

YaMuvva · 12/05/2024 10:00

LaMarschallin · 12/05/2024 09:18

upinaballoon

The late Queen knew her subjects from her objects. It's not difficult.

Quite.
You're also right about the use of "myself" inappropriately. It's everywhere and, again, I think people feel it sounds more, rather than less, educated.

The myself/yourself/himself really gets on my wick.

If anyone watched series 2 of The Traitors UK lately your know what I mean.
”Unfortunately Steven, myself thinks yourself is the traitor” 🙄🙄

YaMuvva · 12/05/2024 10:02

Inkanta · 12/05/2024 09:27

Intense negativity.

Should people only be saying nice things? Their behaviour is abhorrent IMO and it’s fine to discuss it especially when they apparently take it upon themselves to ignore intense bullying and misinformation around the UK and Brits, and especially their sick sister in law

MacavitytheMystery · 12/05/2024 10:03

Noseyoldcow · 12/05/2024 09:33

I just knew she'd wear inappropriate, ill fitting, creased clothes, though I didn't anticipate just how flesh baring and disrespectful they'd be.
I also knew they'd both spout a load of bollocks, and they haven't disappointed there. Harry asking some poor chap about naming his false leg, and Meghan coming out with the usual role model guff.
As for lecturing regarding mental health, well this pair are bloody mental, so what's that all about?

Totally agree

YaMuvva · 12/05/2024 10:03

Blinkeredsoul34 · 12/05/2024 09:29

I find the term “loose canon” rather problematic, the way it’s used on these boards anyway, implying that the British royal family and British establishment are the only people in the world allowed to dictate what charity work others can do or not. And that others somehow need their permission! It’s such a hide bound attitude.

The same term was applied to Diana when she took part in a campaign against land mines just before she died, when the charity said afterwards her efforts had made a significant difference in changing the laws and treaties governing their use.

There are all sorts of different ways to skin a cat! Not one organisation or family has a monopoly!

Diana WAS a loose cannon but she also did a lot of meaningful work that had a hugely positive impact.

I can say the former for H&M but I’m afraid I can’t say the latter. Telling people living in abject poverty in a dangerous country “It’s ok to not be OK” is not the same as what Diana did. Diana did not make her work about herself.

OneHeartySnail · 12/05/2024 10:14

YaMuvva · 12/05/2024 09:58

Sorry but I’m sniggering at the assertion that she was ever well known for charity work. I’m not saying she didn’t do it but she’s able to go to Nigeria on a quasi-tour like this because she married Harry not because she was in Suits. It’s just obtuse to say otherwise

Not to mention playing the UK national anthem. Why the British national anthem but not the American, given Meghan is American and Harry is resident there now...? Could it be their connection with the 'toxic' RF?

OP posts:
Mymilkshakebringsallthepapstomycar · 12/05/2024 10:16

Very good point @OneHeartySnail . The US national anthem would have been much more appropriate.

LumiB · 12/05/2024 10:20

Mylovelygreendress · 12/05/2024 08:27

How many people had heard of Meghan before Harry ? Suits was not a big thing in the U.K. . We are repeatedly told she was wealthy in her own right ; well I am sure she had more money than me but she didn’t own property , she leased a car yet still had an expensive lifestyle . That’s not a criticism of her. She certainly seemed to work hard at becoming famous but let’s not totally rewrite history.

I'm not rewriting history. But say her only.achievement is marrying a rich guy is wrong.

I watched Suits and I know lots of people who did at the time. It may not of been huge here but it was in other countries and that is why it ran for long, if the viewing figures were dire it wouldn't grt renewed for another season.

And who cares if she doesn't own a property or a car? In many other countries renting and leasing is the way if life and ownership isn't. You aay it's not a criticism of her yet you bring it up to judge her.

SOxon · 12/05/2024 10:20

Is she going to move to Nigeria - a Nut producing country, they would instantly feel at home

LumiB · 12/05/2024 10:24

Mymilkshakebringsallthepapstomycar · 12/05/2024 08:30

Her current status and the platforms she is afforded are purely based on her marriage. Her pre Harry career isn’t what she is selling as her “brand”. I do agree that her acting career was much better than most acting wannabes ever achieve, but she doesn’t talk about any of that in her present incarnation.

It’s also somewhat different in that with her marriage came a title and the “job” of being that title as well as the kudos, status, deference and wealth that comes with it. If one of us marries a rich lawyer, that marriage may propel us into a big house and some social status based on wealth. It does not propel us into being experts in law ourselves and we won’t be given an audience in court as a lawyer because our husband is one. Meghan’s marriage has propelled her into fora she has no expertise in because of her “job” as duchess, not because of her personal achievements. And yes, it’s no different to anyone else marrying into the RF, but then working RF have to be careful about what they are holding themselves out to be experts in, unlike these royals gone rogue.

I was reaponding to a poster who said her achievement is just marrying a rich guy. It wasn't about her current status. If someone asked you about your achievements you woukd look across your whole life not just your current status.

BigWillyLittleTodger · 12/05/2024 10:31

I'm not rewriting history. But say her only.achievement is marrying a rich guy is wrong.

Two rich guys, let’s not forget film producer husband number one Trevor, plus a rich Daddy.

WatchOutMissMarpleIsAbout · 12/05/2024 10:32

The thing is like it or not, Meghan and other women who marry into the RF have the huge platform they do because of who they have married. To say otherwise is disingenuous.

Some adapt well. I’d say Kate has.

Some make mistakes and then adapt. Sophie for one. Though it took years.

Some make lots of mistakes and can’t adapt. Sarah F.

Some can’t take adapt and get out. Meghan.

BemusedAmerican · 12/05/2024 10:35

It is obvious neither of them care for the US in the least. I hope they decide to move to Nigeria. Cheaper for them, and easier for the US and the UK. She can become the Martha Stewart of Nigeria.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.