US media are reporting that Rose Hanbury, Marchioness of Cholmondeley, has denied rumours of an affair with Prince William.
“Business Insider reached out to all parties involved with the affair scandal. While Kensington Palace “declined to comment,” Hanbury said through her lawyers that “the rumours are completely false.” This marks the first time that Hanbury has publicly said something about the affair ever since the rumors emerged”.
This looks like it was in response to a joke about William/Rose/Kate relationship on ‘The Late Show with Stephen Colbert’.
The royal family
Rose Hanbury denies rumours
PrettyFlyforaMaiTai · 18/03/2024 22:26
Vespanest · 18/03/2024 23:56
Colbert hides behind other people have said it, using alleged and that it is a rumour. Legally he is reporting what other have said, the lawyers would be fine with it
Editedmiri1985 · 19/03/2024 00:02
He really wouldn't be especially not if the suit was in the UK, not sure about US libel laws. Look at Sally Bercow she alluded to the false rumour about Lord McAlpine being a paedophile, lots of other people were also repeating that rumour but he was still successful in his case against her.
Someone can't say "alleged" and get away with saying whatever they want
Vespanest · 18/03/2024 23:56
Colbert hides behind other people have said it, using alleged and that it is a rumour. Legally he is reporting what other have said, the lawyers would be fine with it
EditedVespanest · 19/03/2024 00:17
In the US the royals would have to prove that what was said is false, what Colbert said was rumours of an affair had gained traction on the internet is true. The US libel law are known to be harder and the burden of proof is different in the UK.
miri1985 · 19/03/2024 00:02
He really wouldn't be especially not if the suit was in the UK, not sure about US libel laws. Look at Sally Bercow she alluded to the false rumour about Lord McAlpine being a paedophile, lots of other people were also repeating that rumour but he was still successful in his case against her.
Someone can't say "alleged" and get away with saying whatever they want
Vespanest · 18/03/2024 23:56
Colbert hides behind other people have said it, using alleged and that it is a rumour. Legally he is reporting what other have said, the lawyers would be fine with it
Editedmiri1985 · 19/03/2024 00:29
I assume they would sue in England, they're based here so its not as if they could be accused of forum shopping. Also Colbert is shown over here and available online so it was published over here too. Nothing stopping them from suing over here.
Vespanest · 19/03/2024 00:17
In the US the royals would have to prove that what was said is false, what Colbert said was rumours of an affair had gained traction on the internet is true. The US libel law are known to be harder and the burden of proof is different in the UK.
miri1985 · 19/03/2024 00:02
He really wouldn't be especially not if the suit was in the UK, not sure about US libel laws. Look at Sally Bercow she alluded to the false rumour about Lord McAlpine being a paedophile, lots of other people were also repeating that rumour but he was still successful in his case against her.
Someone can't say "alleged" and get away with saying whatever they want
Vespanest · 18/03/2024 23:56
Colbert hides behind other people have said it, using alleged and that it is a rumour. Legally he is reporting what other have said, the lawyers would be fine with it
EditedDon’t want to miss threads like this?
Weekly
Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!
Log in to update your newsletter preferences.
You've subscribed!
Vespanest · 19/03/2024 00:17
In the US the royals would have to prove that what was said is false, what Colbert said was rumours of an affair had gained traction on the internet is true. The US libel law are known to be harder and the burden of proof is different in the UK.
miri1985 · 19/03/2024 00:02
He really wouldn't be especially not if the suit was in the UK, not sure about US libel laws. Look at Sally Bercow she alluded to the false rumour about Lord McAlpine being a paedophile, lots of other people were also repeating that rumour but he was still successful in his case against her.
Someone can't say "alleged" and get away with saying whatever they want
Vespanest · 18/03/2024 23:56
Colbert hides behind other people have said it, using alleged and that it is a rumour. Legally he is reporting what other have said, the lawyers would be fine with it
EditedVespanest · 19/03/2024 00:34
Sue for what? There is a huge difference in calling someone a paedophile a criminal activity and repeating a rumour that has already been published in the UK as recently as Scobie.
miri1985 · 19/03/2024 00:29
I assume they would sue in England, they're based here so its not as if they could be accused of forum shopping. Also Colbert is shown over here and available online so it was published over here too. Nothing stopping them from suing over here.
Vespanest · 19/03/2024 00:17
In the US the royals would have to prove that what was said is false, what Colbert said was rumours of an affair had gained traction on the internet is true. The US libel law are known to be harder and the burden of proof is different in the UK.
miri1985 · 19/03/2024 00:02
He really wouldn't be especially not if the suit was in the UK, not sure about US libel laws. Look at Sally Bercow she alluded to the false rumour about Lord McAlpine being a paedophile, lots of other people were also repeating that rumour but he was still successful in his case against her.
Someone can't say "alleged" and get away with saying whatever they want
Vespanest · 18/03/2024 23:56
Colbert hides behind other people have said it, using alleged and that it is a rumour. Legally he is reporting what other have said, the lawyers would be fine with it
EditedTo comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.