Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Prince William's Absence (Part Two)

1000 replies

MaggieFS · 28/02/2024 09:42

Following on from this glorious thread

William just pulled out of event due to personal reasons http://www.mumsnet.com/Talk/theroyall_family/5017144-william-just-pulled-out-of-event-due-to-personal-reasons

OP posts:
Thread gallery
15
CatsAddictedToDreamies · 29/02/2024 08:06

The headphone anecdote just says to me that it must be fucking awful to live a life where you can't have an off day or a minor irritation without it being talked about by random taxi drivers and passers by for years.

Calliopespa · 29/02/2024 08:06

spriots · 29/02/2024 07:55

I think part of the problem is that neither William or Kate put in the hard yards before this, so they already have a reputation for being lazy and not wanting to do much, then now he has done nothing but go to a couple of jollies in 3 months.

I think that's exactly right.

TBH I wonder if they haven't stated the reason for Kate's surgery because it isn't that serious and they don't want it to be obvious that they're taking loads more time off than they need to.

It's their previous reputation that makes me wonder that - if it was Princess Anne, it wouldn't even occur to me

It has to be said Anne is pretty awesome. I just remember catching a glimpse of her silhouetted in the doorway of the abbey after riding ( no frailty here ) to the Coronation as Gold Stick, and as she stood looking almost Napoleonic in her garb I thought what an absolute legend . For me the role of Gold Stick is now like a kind of like a conciliatory Darth Vader. She even managed to greet Harry without awkward gulps or twisted smile. Just gets on with it.

justasking111 · 29/02/2024 08:09

naicehamandeggs · 29/02/2024 07:40

I think another superinjunction needed to be put in place and the judge turned tricky so a personal appearance in chambers was needed. It was absolutely imperative that it was in place before the decision on Harry's security was released 'cos - toys/pram.

Now that's a logical suggestion

CurlewKate · 29/02/2024 08:09

@crumblingschools "your life is not your own anymore, I would hate page after page on social media of people speculating whether I had issues with my bowels"

Agreed-although there are compensations! But talk to me about the difficult and onerous task of being monarch. The job you have to train for and put in the "hard yards". Why couldn't any of us step into the "job" tomorrow?

Ramalangadingdong · 29/02/2024 08:11

PinkTonic · 29/02/2024 08:01

Have you sent good wishes then @Roussette ? Unless they felt personally snubbed I’m not clear why anyone would be so personally invested in a thank you message.
Unless of course one’s raison d’etre is finding and amplifying anti royal sentiment on the internet, however trivial.

With due respect @Roussette is not a public figure so is not obliged to relay a thank you message. Many on here have been vociferous in stating that Meghan and Harry cannot pick and choose the boundaries of their privacy. So the same must apply to others in the RF, no?

SecondUsername4me · 29/02/2024 08:11

The "how can they be finding it difficult, they have no real worries" narrative is quite disgusting tbh.

There are many many families up and down the country who are struggling with various things. Some of these families will be wealthy, some won't. Some of these families will have ailing parents, some won't. Some of these families will have work challenges, some won't.

It's all relative. Making "struggling" or "suffering with MH/stress" only the domain of those you deem worthy of it is nasty. It can hit anyone for anything. It's relatice to your personal circumstances.

Angrycat2768 · 29/02/2024 08:12

CatsAddictedToDreamies · 29/02/2024 08:06

The headphone anecdote just says to me that it must be fucking awful to live a life where you can't have an off day or a minor irritation without it being talked about by random taxi drivers and passers by for years.

They have moths and months off a year, holed up in various country estates. Kate and William did 100 engagements each a year. That is sometimes made up of phonecalls and zoom meetings. Even generously, it amounts to about a days work a week, term time only. They literally only have to put their game face on for a few hours a month, in a job where they have everything prepared for them, and even if they say something rude or ignorant, no one challenges them or tells them to their face if they have done something wrong or made a mistake. And in return for never having to worry about paying a bill, cooking dinner, the cost of living, the food bill going up, doing the housework, childcare, their children's education or job prospects, ever.

ExactlySo · 29/02/2024 08:12

Calliopespa · 29/02/2024 08:06

It has to be said Anne is pretty awesome. I just remember catching a glimpse of her silhouetted in the doorway of the abbey after riding ( no frailty here ) to the Coronation as Gold Stick, and as she stood looking almost Napoleonic in her garb I thought what an absolute legend . For me the role of Gold Stick is now like a kind of like a conciliatory Darth Vader. She even managed to greet Harry without awkward gulps or twisted smile. Just gets on with it.

Edited

But the late Queen was criticised for never being there for her children and the implication is they developed into a dysfunctional family, all with 'issues' of some kind.

W&C want to be hands on parents. They have 3 children.

If they were not being hands-on parents, people would criticise that.

Princess A is not the angel some people think. Some of her constant work is possibly to get away from her H!

SecondUsername4me · 29/02/2024 08:13

ExactlySo · 29/02/2024 08:12

But the late Queen was criticised for never being there for her children and the implication is they developed into a dysfunctional family, all with 'issues' of some kind.

W&C want to be hands on parents. They have 3 children.

If they were not being hands-on parents, people would criticise that.

Princess A is not the angel some people think. Some of her constant work is possibly to get away from her H!

If mumsnet wad around when QE2 was raising her dc, there would be multiple threads judging her.

Newchapterbeckons · 29/02/2024 08:14

ExactlySo · 29/02/2024 08:12

But the late Queen was criticised for never being there for her children and the implication is they developed into a dysfunctional family, all with 'issues' of some kind.

W&C want to be hands on parents. They have 3 children.

If they were not being hands-on parents, people would criticise that.

Princess A is not the angel some people think. Some of her constant work is possibly to get away from her H!

Millions of people have three children and work full time! It’s not an either/ or situation! They are all at school - and have a team of staff. What are they doing every day if they are not working??

ExactlySo · 29/02/2024 08:15

@Angrycat2768 Are you very young? Have you missed all the criticism about the late Queen and the D of E, and how they were distant parents?

The late Queen was often held to account in later years for not putting her family further up the list of priorities.

W&C are not yet King and Queen. Their time for wall to wall public duties is yet to come.

They have made it clear that they want to be hands on parents and not create another dysfunctional family.

I think they are very sensible indeed.

justasking111 · 29/02/2024 08:16

Princess Anne knew what she was doing when refusing titles for her children. Eugenie lives out a better private life in Portugal.

My sons are the same age as William and Harry. Very close. It would break my heart if they fell out like this. I always thought together W&H could handle anything.

Newchapterbeckons · 29/02/2024 08:16

ExactlySo · 29/02/2024 08:15

@Angrycat2768 Are you very young? Have you missed all the criticism about the late Queen and the D of E, and how they were distant parents?

The late Queen was often held to account in later years for not putting her family further up the list of priorities.

W&C are not yet King and Queen. Their time for wall to wall public duties is yet to come.

They have made it clear that they want to be hands on parents and not create another dysfunctional family.

I think they are very sensible indeed.

But theof children are in school every day why can’t they work then? They are not parenting 247 are they!

spriots · 29/02/2024 08:17

There is a lot of middle ground between the way the late Queen parented - leaving her young children for long periods to do tours - and having both parents around for every single school holiday and every pick up.

ExactlySo · 29/02/2024 08:18

Ah, you're back @Newchapterbeckons

How's your sister, by the way?

You can't compare being on show as Royals with working as a non Royal.

William had a very difficult childhood and he wants to be there for his children.
That's far more valuable than cutting a ribbon somewhere.

IwishIcouldfinishabook · 29/02/2024 08:18

SecondUsername4me · 29/02/2024 08:13

If mumsnet wad around when QE2 was raising her dc, there would be multiple threads judging her.

The Queen chose to go and live in Malta without her children before she was Queen. There are stories about her wanting to bath Andrew but not having a clue what to do with him, so passing him over to the nanny. She was not a natural mother. Most parents manage to bring up well rounded children without both parents working part time, term time only. If the way to have well rounded children was for both parents to have the school holidays off and work 10.00-2,30, maybe Kates Early Years campaign should be lobbying the government for all of us to have that!

ExactlySo · 29/02/2024 08:19

Newchapterbeckons · 29/02/2024 08:16

But theof children are in school every day why can’t they work then? They are not parenting 247 are they!

Sorry but who are you to say they ought to work more?

Unless you have insight into exactly what they do- and the work behind the scenes that doesn't appear in the media- you don't have a clue.

Newchapterbeckons · 29/02/2024 08:20

ExactlySo · 29/02/2024 08:19

Sorry but who are you to say they ought to work more?

Unless you have insight into exactly what they do- and the work behind the scenes that doesn't appear in the media- you don't have a clue.

I am one of the tax payers paying close to a 100 million a year for this shit show.

spriots · 29/02/2024 08:21

I also can't help but notice that they make more time for things like Wimbledon or the BAFTAs than the less fun engagements.

I am sure someone will shortly try to claim that it's exhausting preparing for every engagement which just begs the question of how the older royals are somehow managing 3x the amount of this tremendously hard task

Laiste · 29/02/2024 08:21

The Queen (E2) was an impressive iron clad figure head - always seen to stick to duty.

That image was tarnished for me when she allowed bloody Andrew to hide behind her skirts.

But that is/was a reminder that she was human and her feelings did influence bad decisions with bad optics.

They are all only human.

Dearg · 29/02/2024 08:22

IwishIcouldfinishabook · 29/02/2024 08:18

The Queen chose to go and live in Malta without her children before she was Queen. There are stories about her wanting to bath Andrew but not having a clue what to do with him, so passing him over to the nanny. She was not a natural mother. Most parents manage to bring up well rounded children without both parents working part time, term time only. If the way to have well rounded children was for both parents to have the school holidays off and work 10.00-2,30, maybe Kates Early Years campaign should be lobbying the government for all of us to have that!

To be fair to late Queenie, she lived in Malta as Princess Elizabeth, before children, whilst Philip was stationed there. She did not abandon her children to play house in Malta.

Totally agree she did not come across as a natural mother though.

EdithWeston · 29/02/2024 08:22

Serenster · 28/02/2024 17:11

The PP who said the situation is strongly reminiscent of this had it dead right.

The Palace has told you what has happened, and told you when you might expect to see the Princess of Wales about an about. It’s not rocket science…

Piers Morgan seems to be the one stoking it, this time round.

"very strange and rather concerning"

But his agenda is obvious - the Royals aren't meant to have privacy. Even when recovering from surgery. They are meant to satisfy the tabloids at all times.

IfYourHorseSaysNo · 29/02/2024 08:22

Angrycat2768 · 29/02/2024 08:12

They have moths and months off a year, holed up in various country estates. Kate and William did 100 engagements each a year. That is sometimes made up of phonecalls and zoom meetings. Even generously, it amounts to about a days work a week, term time only. They literally only have to put their game face on for a few hours a month, in a job where they have everything prepared for them, and even if they say something rude or ignorant, no one challenges them or tells them to their face if they have done something wrong or made a mistake. And in return for never having to worry about paying a bill, cooking dinner, the cost of living, the food bill going up, doing the housework, childcare, their children's education or job prospects, ever.

Edited

I presumed they had it quite easy with work but I had no idea they did so little. Bloody hell. 😮

Newchapterbeckons · 29/02/2024 08:23

ExactlySo · 29/02/2024 08:19

Sorry but who are you to say they ought to work more?

Unless you have insight into exactly what they do- and the work behind the scenes that doesn't appear in the media- you don't have a clue.

Apart from trying on pretty dresses and going to sporting and polo events what exactly do they ‘do’? They have teams of housekeepers, maids, nannies and chauffeurs! It’s not hard to understand.

Angrycat2768 · 29/02/2024 08:23

ExactlySo · 29/02/2024 08:19

Sorry but who are you to say they ought to work more?

Unless you have insight into exactly what they do- and the work behind the scenes that doesn't appear in the media- you don't have a clue.

They are there at our pleasure. If they don't want to be there and don't want to put in the effort, then they should go. It would make little difference to the running of the country if we elected a ceremonial Head of State instead. We may be able to ditch the House of Lords, and have a proper National Anthem that is about all of us, the citizens of this country rather than one person. They want to be there, and they want the status and luxuries being a Monarch and their family that it provides. So they need to do their part. We know what they do because it's listed in the Court Circular, and they have legions of staff. If they are preparing for all their visits themselves, then don t get us to pay for 60-800 staff each. If they don't want to do the work, give Buck House to the state to open up all year round for tourists and get them to pay for their own house renovations.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.