Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family
peefinsinwales · 06/05/2026 22:58

CosyTraybake · 06/05/2026 22:49

Haha they're def unique...

Not wishing to spam the thread, but culottes are just plain old culottes. Probably not the nicest thing to have them flapping around your legs all day.

I doubt George will go there. We'll find out in September. Hope it's nowhere near where my dc go to school and later uni.

WW3 · 06/05/2026 23:22

peefinsinwales · 06/05/2026 22:39

I don't think that's fair. Most parents just want to spend time together as a family.
I can't imagine entrusting my child into the care of complete strangers, there are always dodgy power nuts and abusers, hell no. Also I wouldn't want an institution to raise my dc, I quite like doing it myself.

In fact the evidence shows that most parents don’t want to spend time together as a family. There was a survey last year that found that less than a third of families eat a daily meal together. The recent debate around social media and smart phones for children showed that many children spend much of their time outside school on the internet, not having family time with their parents - many of whom are themselves exhausted from their work and/or pursuing their own interests such as the gym or doing household chores. You just have to see the many many threads on mumsnet about blended families to see stories of horrible family situations with very unhappy children and parents who prioritise their own happiness over that of their children and children being ferried backwards and forwards with no stability.

The boarding vs day school debate often presupposes that children have an amazing time at regular day school: but this is not the universal experience. While there are people who went to boarding school and regret the experience, there are also people who were glad to see the back of their day school and the bullying/boredom/pettiness etc etc and never see their classmates at all.

You entrust your children to “complete strangers” every day when you send them to school - you can’t possibly know all the adults they encounter during the school day. Again, you will find many threads on mumsnet where children have been exposed to inappropriate material by teachers - at day schools.

You don’t think boarding schools are right for your family - I get that and I understand that - but for some families they are a very good option for both the children and the parents - and it depends on the parents and the children and the school fit. But I don’t think a blanket good/bad is the right paradigm.

For some families where both parents work and one or both travel a lot or are posted abroad, boarding school works very well. For some overseas families, the quality of a British education is something they aspire to for their children and this is only possible through boarding. For others the opportunities of on-site sport/music/volunteering/acting etc are too compelling to pass up. For others, the journey times to a good school are too long and boarding is a better option.

I think it is wonderful that in this country we have so much choice in schools - and don’t forget there are state boarding schools too - in fact David Lammy the deputy prime minister went to a state boarding school as a chorister and he says it transformed his life.

There is so much inverse snobbery around boarding schools. Why can’t we all be grateful that it’s there as one of many options, right for some people, and there are other options right for other people?

(And, no, I didn’t go to boarding school and my children didn’t go to boarding school, but I can respect other people’s choices and accept that they made what they hoped would be the best choice for their family - as I’m sure William and Kate will do.)

Edit: oops I just remembered that David Lammy isn’t foreign secretary anymore, he’s deputy prime minister!

peefinsinwales · 07/05/2026 03:55

WW3 · 06/05/2026 23:22

In fact the evidence shows that most parents don’t want to spend time together as a family. There was a survey last year that found that less than a third of families eat a daily meal together. The recent debate around social media and smart phones for children showed that many children spend much of their time outside school on the internet, not having family time with their parents - many of whom are themselves exhausted from their work and/or pursuing their own interests such as the gym or doing household chores. You just have to see the many many threads on mumsnet about blended families to see stories of horrible family situations with very unhappy children and parents who prioritise their own happiness over that of their children and children being ferried backwards and forwards with no stability.

The boarding vs day school debate often presupposes that children have an amazing time at regular day school: but this is not the universal experience. While there are people who went to boarding school and regret the experience, there are also people who were glad to see the back of their day school and the bullying/boredom/pettiness etc etc and never see their classmates at all.

You entrust your children to “complete strangers” every day when you send them to school - you can’t possibly know all the adults they encounter during the school day. Again, you will find many threads on mumsnet where children have been exposed to inappropriate material by teachers - at day schools.

You don’t think boarding schools are right for your family - I get that and I understand that - but for some families they are a very good option for both the children and the parents - and it depends on the parents and the children and the school fit. But I don’t think a blanket good/bad is the right paradigm.

For some families where both parents work and one or both travel a lot or are posted abroad, boarding school works very well. For some overseas families, the quality of a British education is something they aspire to for their children and this is only possible through boarding. For others the opportunities of on-site sport/music/volunteering/acting etc are too compelling to pass up. For others, the journey times to a good school are too long and boarding is a better option.

I think it is wonderful that in this country we have so much choice in schools - and don’t forget there are state boarding schools too - in fact David Lammy the deputy prime minister went to a state boarding school as a chorister and he says it transformed his life.

There is so much inverse snobbery around boarding schools. Why can’t we all be grateful that it’s there as one of many options, right for some people, and there are other options right for other people?

(And, no, I didn’t go to boarding school and my children didn’t go to boarding school, but I can respect other people’s choices and accept that they made what they hoped would be the best choice for their family - as I’m sure William and Kate will do.)

Edit: oops I just remembered that David Lammy isn’t foreign secretary anymore, he’s deputy prime minister!

Edited

😂

Itsahardknocklifeforus · 08/05/2026 19:27

PrinceHarrysBaldPatch · 06/05/2026 07:59

Children have spent more time than ever with their parents over the last 20 years and mental health problems are worse than ever. Maybe time with friends and away from parents is EXACTLY what kids actually need?
Obviously being abandoned there by parents, who want to get rid of you is different.

Agree wholeheartedly.
Limited phones and social media. Being cocooned in a controlled, safe environment with frequent contact with family, structured academics, an array of well organised sports, no commute, healthy meals, around the clock pastoral support. It sounds blissful. I'd love to be in a position to offer this to my kids.

Itsahardknocklifeforus · 08/05/2026 19:31

Agree George's school has already been chosen.
Maybe he has to choose his subjects now and had a meeting to discuss with the school?
Or else they are looking at it for Charlotte.

CosyTraybake · 08/05/2026 22:50

This reply has been withdrawn

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

CosyTraybake · 08/05/2026 23:25

This reply has been withdrawn

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

CosyTraybake · 08/05/2026 23:54

This reply has been withdrawn

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

PrinceHarrysBaldPatch · 09/05/2026 00:14

This reply has been deleted

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

You mentioned the name of the house on this thread that has since been deleted - trying to cover your tracks?!

CosyTraybake · 09/05/2026 00:17

This reply has been withdrawn

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

TemuRoyal · 10/05/2026 15:23

Maybe George is signed up for Prince William School in Oundle and the chauffeur took them to the wrong door?

MaggieFS · 12/05/2026 11:39

George won’t be going to Oundle, and any current viewing isn’t for George anyway.

I will revert and eat my metaphorical hat if I’m wrong.

MarmaladeorJam · 13/05/2026 14:40

TightlyLacedCorset · 05/05/2026 23:15

I don't think your view is unpopular at all.

That said, the needs of children for their parents hasn't changed in this day and age. In this day and age children are probably more in need of their parents than ever before, going by stats on mental health among young people.

Whilst I might be being a bit presumptive about W, K and G's situation and their motivations, it is objectively true that it is not (all things being equal, obviously if home life is abusive, or parents are travelling 24/7 it may be the best alternative option) better for children to be separated from their parents at a young age, to be surrounded day and night by their peers of similar age, especially when they are soon to go into a vulnerable period of physiological development.

It cannot be for the academics. W&K are loaded and George given the amazing breadth of life experiences he's already had, should be reasonably bright and capable of achieving great things whilst not full time boarding. They can afford the best private tutors after all.

I don't know, I keep wondering if being Royal actually harms the children, who cannot after all choose whether to be part of the monarchy, and whether the monarchy should be removed so they can be free to have other options in their lives.

But I accept that he may well be happy and end up doing reasonably well. I hope he does. I really want to see an end to the era's of scandals and sadness with regards to the RF. That needs to be over.

In this day and age children are probably more in need of their parents than ever before, going by stats on mental health among young people.

At this point, the criteria for what constitutes "mental health problem" needs to be revisited and perhaps, redefined.

Mine are spoon fed "mental health problems/vulnerabilities" in school and almost trained into them. For example, pre exams they will say - oh I am suffering from anxiety.

In my opinion though, they are simply dealing with transient feelings of pressure and worry that come as a package around an exam, and indeed, will end shorty after the exam. The worry will start up again shorty before the results come out, and so on. All of which is healthy, and not a mental health disorder.

Anxiety is ongoing and debilitating. It is very difficult for the people who suffer from it, and for those who love them.

In trying to do something positive, I feel that we have made some serious errors and need to revisit.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page