Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Heart of Invictus Well done that man!

770 replies

Rosiem2808 · 07/09/2023 10:21

Prince Harry keeping it real

OP posts:
Thread gallery
109
skullbabe · 21/02/2024 16:19

Why does M need SUCH expensive clothes

Why does it matter to you? Why does their spending bother you? It’s not your money - if they are burning through their cash isn’t that their problem? Why does spending like A listers or Royalty bother you if they can afford it?

and why does she need a new outfit for every public occasion?

She wore several items that she had worn before in Whistler so this is not a correct assertion.

Princess Anne is famous for turning up to her gigs in well-worn and pretty unremarkable clothes, because she gets it: it's not about her.*

Meghan’s wear was pretty unremarkable - she wore coats, jeans and boots on all days out in the snow and a coat, trousers and those gloves for wheelchair curling. She wore many well worn items too.

She went out to dinner twice and a gala and dressed appropriately for all events.

Anne also doesn’t wear M&S and wears clothing that is out of the price range of many people in the UK. She has someone to help her with finding pieces and outfits.

derxa · 21/02/2024 16:28

and those gloves for wheelchair curling Just what everybody wears down the curling rink😆

Roussette · 21/02/2024 16:31

Spectre8 · 21/02/2024 12:25

Well maybe they want to stay more involved than other people who have stepped back? Why is anyone judging their choices endlessly. I mean ffs if they don't step back it's all nasty reasons of other people don't step back it's all wonderful comments about what they are doing.

As I've said before none of you will be happy until they are dead. Or homeless and lost everything in life.

When there was a period of time where they were quiet nothing being reported on them, there were still threads taking Why are they quiet? what are they plotting?

Yes to this.

There's nothing they can do or say or not do and not say that will suit some

Sming is attention seeking after all... As is putting your hand near your face or wearing a padded coat in the snow

TallerSally · 21/02/2024 16:44

Princess Anne is famous for turning up to her gigs in well-worn and pretty unremarkable clothes, because she gets it: it's not about her.

...comparing Meghan to Princess Anne...

gee - is Meghan a working royal, now? I must have missed that!

Last I checked, she was a private citizen doing philanthropy on her own behalf, not on behalf of the british royal family, but I may have missed the whole "Megxit" thing...

Clearly, she should NOT be allowed to wear what she wants to spend 3 full days shaking hands, chit-chatting and smiling with mostly strangers at Invictus.

How dare her think she can!!!! 😠

YupIKnow · 21/02/2024 16:57

Spectre8 · 21/02/2024 13:32

If she has paid for the clothes, what's the problem? She can wear what she likes, buy what she likes... just because you wouldnt pay those prices or chnage your clothes that often doesn't mean other people should

To be fair that attitude permeates their whole life. If they pay for the flights what's the problem? Oh wait Travalyst ........ If they pay for a massive house and garden like that when California has payments for ordinary people to get rid off their lawns and create drought friendly gardens what's the problem? Oh wait ...sustainability. It's all do as we say and not do as we do/

skullbabe · 21/02/2024 17:04

Just what everybody wears down the curling rink

Didnt think they were a good match and hence why I highlighted them. These, also however for the people who are concerned that she wears things once, were a pair she had worn before.

derxa · 21/02/2024 17:18

skullbabe · 21/02/2024 17:04

Just what everybody wears down the curling rink

Didnt think they were a good match and hence why I highlighted them. These, also however for the people who are concerned that she wears things once, were a pair she had worn before.

I don't normally comment on looks or fashion but the gloves need to stay in the garden shed.

skullbabe · 21/02/2024 17:20

Sure

YupIKnow · 21/02/2024 17:23

@derxa so they are not on your Christmas list?

derxa · 21/02/2024 17:25

YupIKnow · 21/02/2024 17:23

@derxa so they are not on your Christmas list?

😂

CoffeeCantata · 21/02/2024 18:13

skullbabe · Today 16:19

Why does M need SUCH expensive clothes

Why does it matter to you? Why does their spending bother you? It’s not your money - if they are burning through their cash isn’t that their problem? Why does spending like A listers or Royalty bother you if they can afford it?

I'm going to assume this isn't a rhetorical question - the MN favourite, 'Why do you care?'

And it's a good question! But I do. As I said in my post, context is all - at a premiere I get it, but not for an outdoor sports event where the focus should be on the amazing participants. I'll be honest: personally I find conspicuous consumption upsetting. It's simple-minded, yes, but I just can't help thinking - gosh, if they'd given the value of those clothes to the actual charity...

So it's not just where Meghan is concerned, but she is a publicity-seeker and she has come to my attention.

Both Meghan (and Catherine) are model-standard women who could frankly wear anything and look elegant. They are precisely the types who could buy from the smarter high-street stores (say, Jigsaw and others I can't remember the names of!) and look amazing. I think C has worn Hobbs and Jigsaw to acclaim. Still beyond many budgets, but not stratospheric. So why not a £250 dress instead of a £50,000 dress? Why do I care? I don't in a personal sense (except see below...) but I think their lifestyle may be unsustainable and they'd be wise for all sorts of reasons to rein it in. Aren't they both always asking for someone else to fund things, such as their security etc?

Thinking about your question, I suppose what I care about is the fawning and gushing about someone's clothes and appearance which this thread has featured. Meghan is a lovely-looking woman (not an achievement) and looks good in some super-expensive clothes (not an achievement). It just seems unbelievably shallow to make so much of these things. I love clothes and I like to be fashionable, but you don't need to spend the sort of money that would buy a house in some parts of Britain on one outfit. It think it's unhealthy and stirs up really unhealthy aspirations, especially among youngsters who think labels are everything.

There was another thread where posters were gushing about the good looks of the 3 royal children, and I found that uncomfortable too. It's great to say 'they're an attractive lot', but the concomitant insults about less attractive royals made me queasy - I don't value people for their luck in the looks dept, or their ability to buy designer clothes. I've been made all too aware, reading both these threads, that that is what counts with many people, and I find it depressing.

YupIKnow · 21/02/2024 18:21

derxa · 21/02/2024 17:25

😂

maybe the earrings then?

skullbabe · 21/02/2024 18:30

For anyone veteran adjacent to share

Heart of Invictus  Well done that man!
Spectre8 · 21/02/2024 18:49

CoffeeCantata · 21/02/2024 18:13

skullbabe · Today 16:19

Why does M need SUCH expensive clothes

Why does it matter to you? Why does their spending bother you? It’s not your money - if they are burning through their cash isn’t that their problem? Why does spending like A listers or Royalty bother you if they can afford it?

I'm going to assume this isn't a rhetorical question - the MN favourite, 'Why do you care?'

And it's a good question! But I do. As I said in my post, context is all - at a premiere I get it, but not for an outdoor sports event where the focus should be on the amazing participants. I'll be honest: personally I find conspicuous consumption upsetting. It's simple-minded, yes, but I just can't help thinking - gosh, if they'd given the value of those clothes to the actual charity...

So it's not just where Meghan is concerned, but she is a publicity-seeker and she has come to my attention.

Both Meghan (and Catherine) are model-standard women who could frankly wear anything and look elegant. They are precisely the types who could buy from the smarter high-street stores (say, Jigsaw and others I can't remember the names of!) and look amazing. I think C has worn Hobbs and Jigsaw to acclaim. Still beyond many budgets, but not stratospheric. So why not a £250 dress instead of a £50,000 dress? Why do I care? I don't in a personal sense (except see below...) but I think their lifestyle may be unsustainable and they'd be wise for all sorts of reasons to rein it in. Aren't they both always asking for someone else to fund things, such as their security etc?

Thinking about your question, I suppose what I care about is the fawning and gushing about someone's clothes and appearance which this thread has featured. Meghan is a lovely-looking woman (not an achievement) and looks good in some super-expensive clothes (not an achievement). It just seems unbelievably shallow to make so much of these things. I love clothes and I like to be fashionable, but you don't need to spend the sort of money that would buy a house in some parts of Britain on one outfit. It think it's unhealthy and stirs up really unhealthy aspirations, especially among youngsters who think labels are everything.

There was another thread where posters were gushing about the good looks of the 3 royal children, and I found that uncomfortable too. It's great to say 'they're an attractive lot', but the concomitant insults about less attractive royals made me queasy - I don't value people for their luck in the looks dept, or their ability to buy designer clothes. I've been made all too aware, reading both these threads, that that is what counts with many people, and I find it depressing.

I'm someone qho made a comment how I loved one of her coats.. you probably say I was gushing I wasn't.

It's perfectly okay to say you love the style or an item like a coat regardless of the price. I didn't even consider the price.

Given the fact that is us normal people who have fuelled the fast fashion crap I for one am glad to see well tailored clothes made from nice material that will last far longer than the tat the rest of us can afford to buy.

So yeah if I want to go wow what a lovely coat I will but that doesn't mean I'm gushing or fawning over someone.

skullbabe · 21/02/2024 18:52

So why not a £250 dress instead of a £50,000 dress?

Nothing Meghan wore this past weekend or at the Dusseldorf Games was worth £50000. Meghan has worn Banana Republic, Zara, J Crew and Staud - all brands below and equal to Jigsaw and Hobbs in value. So again - you might to want to re read the thread. There has been no fawning or gushing about fashion on this thread insofar as to say that Meghan has been appropriately dressed. There is a thread dedicated to her fashion which you might be thinking of.

CoffeeCantata · 21/02/2024 20:33

given the fact that is us normal people who have fuelled the fast fashion crap I for one am glad to see well tailored clothes made from nice material that will last far longer than the tat the rest of us can afford to buy.

I agree fast fashion is bad news. I have some gorgeous things in lovely fabrics which I've either bought second hand or have invested in and kept for literally decades (still going strong).

But realistically the argument that Meghan's clothes will 'last longer than the tat we can afford' is a bit irrelevant because M is hardly going to wear them out, is she? A couple of wears at most, I would guess.

CoffeeCantata · 21/02/2024 20:38

Clearly, she should NOT be allowed to wear what she wants to spend 3 full days shaking hands, chit-chatting and smiling with mostly strangers at Invictus.

a) It's not Meghan so much as people's adoration of her outfits that I find cringey. She's an attractive rich woman wearing expensive clothes - end of.

b)I'm a bit more cynical than you about her 'doing philanthropy'.

skullbabe · 21/02/2024 21:06

But realistically the argument that Meghan's clothes will 'last longer than the tat we can afford' is a bit irrelevant because M is hardly going to wear them out, is she? A couple of wears at most, I would guess.

You don’t know that.

She's an attractive rich woman wearing expensive clothes - end of.

And people like to talk about it. No one is forcing you to but you don’t get to yuck other people’s yum just because you don’t like it. This tangent started with the premise that she used Invictus funds for her wardrobe, then about the cost of her clothes, then how her clothes were attention grabbing, then about how other people wear high street brands, now the assertion that she really doesn’t wear things more than once. Like I said before - it’s the temerity of the woman to exist that bothers people.

Spectre8 · 21/02/2024 21:24

CoffeeCantata · 21/02/2024 20:38

Clearly, she should NOT be allowed to wear what she wants to spend 3 full days shaking hands, chit-chatting and smiling with mostly strangers at Invictus.

a) It's not Meghan so much as people's adoration of her outfits that I find cringey. She's an attractive rich woman wearing expensive clothes - end of.

b)I'm a bit more cynical than you about her 'doing philanthropy'.

Is it okay if we adored clothes in magazines and shop windows? Or what other celebrities wear?

JSMill · 21/02/2024 21:35

The outfits she wore in Canada (except for the White coat) were awful . You couldn't pay me to wear them.

PrincessWildernessOfWherever · 21/02/2024 21:45

Steady @JSMill remember to some posters here she 'always gets it right' 😂

Spectre8 · 21/02/2024 21:53

JSMill · 21/02/2024 21:35

The outfits she wore in Canada (except for the White coat) were awful . You couldn't pay me to wear them.

Love to see what you wear....

PrincessWildernessOfWherever · 21/02/2024 22:03

But Meghan's job is to wear clothes attractively - nothing else

@JSMill doesn't sell herself on her clothing choices

skullbabe · 21/02/2024 22:40

The outfits she wore in Canada (except for the White coat) were awful . You couldn't pay me to wear them.

And that’s fine - you do you. No one is forcing you to.

skullbabe · 21/02/2024 22:42

remember to some posters here she 'always gets it right'

Because those people like her style. You don’t. That’s fine.

Swipe left for the next trending thread