That’s his role. It’s fucked up, but it’s how the institution works. It’s the deal. H didn’t get to properly train and pursue his own choice of career… because of who his father is. So yes, his father as heir then, should continue paying the security as he does for Andrew. Security is based on risk and as a former security for them said, their risk was as high as the Queen’s.
Except Harry wasn't the heir, like William was, so he was given more freedom to pursue his own interests and career. Hence his army career. Harry wanted to join the army and he was able to, unlike William, but he supposedly didn't pass the exams to go further up the ranks. That's not his dad’s fault that he failed the exams. Also, how ironic of you to say that Harry wasn't given proper help and training as he was born a prince, when it came out in a lawsuit that his teacher basically helped him to cheat in order to pass his art subject at school.
Just because you and a former security officer think that the Sussexes’ risk was as high as the Queen’s doesn't make it so. The people (government officials) who decide who gets to have security have concluded that the Sussexes aren't in such danger that they need to have it in an on going basis. They have decided that they would assess on a case by case basis. And they base this on the latest security intel/risk factors that neither you nor the former security officer have access to.
Visa applications are private. That’s why. He should be treated like anyone else. The ‘organisation’ is a right wing American group and the person doing this is a telegraph journalist who was a former aide to Thatcher. It’s weird and strange that people like you want to continue to persecute and ruin their lives. You don’t want them here, you don’t want them there. You don’t want them to be safe. What is it that you want for them? To not exist? There’s a lot of others in that camp, hence his need for security.
If Harry was be treated like anyone else then he really shouldn't have been given a US visa when he's publicly admitted to drug use. Do you think the average person would have been allowed to continue to stay in the USA if they admitted on national tv to doing drugs?
And please, stop with the dramatics. No I’m not persecuting Harry just because I made a comment on an online forum that Harry’s sympathizers cry about him being entitled to his privacy yet don't seem to think his brother should also have the same right to privacy.
No I'm not ruining Harry’s life because I've expressed my views that I think he's stupid and racist and that he shouldn't be entitled to tax payer funded security when he's no longer a working royal and is living overseas. Rest assured, Harry will continue to live in luxury, in a well guarded area, free to continue to whine about how horrible his life has been because he was only born the spare instead of the heir.
No, you’re twisting things again. Nobody on these boards said William wasn’t entitled to privacy at all. You’re lying. What people said was, he received a settlement but kept it quiet and the future king should disclose any settlement from Murdoch. Not the private information. William has sued media before and he made it public he was hacked by NOTW.
Why should William have announced to the whole world that he received a settlement when it didn't even get to court? Yes, William has sued before, but this didn't reach that stage.
The settlement was in relation to William’s phone conversations being hacked, it's no ones business if he received compensation for the wrong that was done to him and it's no ones business if he chose not to publicize it either.
Also, according to you, even though Harry was born a prince, certain things like visa applications are private and therefore he should be treated like anyone else. Well, I could also argue that private settlements are common, and usually aren't allowed to be discussed, and William should also be treated like anyone else even though he is a prince.