Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Harry is in town to fight against the Daily Mail - VIDEO

1000 replies

vera99 · 27/03/2023 09:58

I'm sure we will all wish him well fighting the good fight against the Fail !
https://twitter.com/elliecostelloTV/status/1640274470395838465

https://twitter.com/elliecostelloTV/status/1640274470395838465

OP posts:
Thread gallery
29
Rhondaa · 28/03/2023 10:21

Sweetpeasaremadeforbees · 28/03/2023 10:17

I think Harry's appearance is a distraction at the moment, particularly when the case hasn't even started (assuming it is allowed to). I bet many people having only seen the headlines don't even realise that other people are involved in the case.

He's just keen on rattling his family's cages while desperately trying to claw back some kind of credibility hanging on to the coat tails of others after his recent privacy invading reality show shambles.

Roussette · 28/03/2023 10:21

Rhondaa · 28/03/2023 10:18

'But one poster is just intent on unfunny memes and others clogging up the thread with same old shite. Very boring'

Memes are funny and other people's opinions are as valid as your own whether you like it or not. Stop trying to silence people seeming to expect some kind of bore off echo chamber.

I'm not silencing anyone. Quite obviously, given what's being said on here, it's like groundhog day

Plitvice · 28/03/2023 10:23

Shame on any Sussex fans repeatedly using Baroness Lawrence's treatment by the press to give credibility to Harry's whining just because their arguments are being heard in the same hearing. You don't have to do that. It is disgusting and shows how low you will go to defend your two idols.

Roussette · 28/03/2023 10:28

Plitvice · 28/03/2023 10:23

Shame on any Sussex fans repeatedly using Baroness Lawrence's treatment by the press to give credibility to Harry's whining just because their arguments are being heard in the same hearing. You don't have to do that. It is disgusting and shows how low you will go to defend your two idols.

Shame on you for dismissing Baroness Lawrence's presence at a case involving illegal and disgusting practices and more than just Harry

It would be so much easier for you wouldn't it, if it was just Harry in the court?

Well, tough.
I have discussed her, Sadie Frost, Liz Hurley and how her medical records were stolen when she was pregnant, and Elton John on the stealing of the birth certificate of his little boy before they had even seen it

Samcro · 28/03/2023 10:29

shame on the antis for using a bereaved mother as away of shutting down debate.
(awful that she had been put through this)

Whaeanui · 28/03/2023 10:31

The Baroness and Harry hugged inside the courtroom as noted by journalists. The claimants are a group, known to each other with the same lawyer and are supportive of each other. Just because of who Harry is, doesn’t make him less of a claimant or potential victim of ANL than any other claimant.

Plitvice · 28/03/2023 10:34

If you start a thread about Harry then discuss Harry. none of the tabloid's crimes against the others compare to what they have done to this "bereaved mother" - it is not a loony lib ground leveling exercise. If you have genuine sympathy then leave her out of a royal thread and /or afford her a separate thread rather than dropping her name as ammo to defend angsty Harry.

Sweetpeasaremadeforbees · 28/03/2023 10:42

I doubt Elton John would like to be dismissed so readily!
And there is a lot about Baroness Lawrence everywhere

On here maybe. Sadly in real life a lot of people wouldn't have a clue about Baroness Lawrence. Plus, the fact that Elton John arrived and left via back/side entrances suggests to me that he wasn't seeking any publicity.

Roussette · 28/03/2023 10:43

Plitvice · 28/03/2023 10:34

If you start a thread about Harry then discuss Harry. none of the tabloid's crimes against the others compare to what they have done to this "bereaved mother" - it is not a loony lib ground leveling exercise. If you have genuine sympathy then leave her out of a royal thread and /or afford her a separate thread rather than dropping her name as ammo to defend angsty Harry.

Excuse me. The thread title is about fighting the Daily Mail in a court case. Are we not allowed to mention the others in the case?

Very inconvenient for you that there are more than Harry involved in all of this. It rather holds up the 'we hate Harry' posts doesn't it...
Sorry 'bout that.....

(I have no idea what a 'loony lib ground levelling exercise is')

And no I won't start a seperate thread about Baronness Lawrence. It would be overtaken by Harry dislikers anyway.

Roussette · 28/03/2023 10:44

Sweetpeasaremadeforbees · 28/03/2023 10:42

I doubt Elton John would like to be dismissed so readily!
And there is a lot about Baroness Lawrence everywhere

On here maybe. Sadly in real life a lot of people wouldn't have a clue about Baroness Lawrence. Plus, the fact that Elton John arrived and left via back/side entrances suggests to me that he wasn't seeking any publicity.

It's all over the papers! And in the media. It is unusual for her to be part of this, and no one knew about her hacking.
It is everywhere I have read.

StormzyinaTCup · 28/03/2023 10:54

Excuse me. The thread title is about fighting the Daily Mail in a court case. Are we not allowed to mention the others in the case?

Very inconvenient for you that there are more than Harry involved in all of this. It rather holds up the 'we hate Harry' posts doesn't it...
Sorry 'bout that.....

It's been posted on the RF board and Harry has been been mentioned in the thread title so one would assume the OP wanted to specifically make this post Harry related otherwise they would have posted it in 'Legal' or for more traffic 'Chat' or 'AIBU'. By all means bring up the other people involved in this case but I don't believe the other people in this case were what OP originally wanted to discuss. Of course I could be wrong but OP has not been back in quite some time so 🤷‍♀️

Rhondaa · 28/03/2023 10:57

'The Baroness and Harry hugged inside the courtroom as noted by journalists'

Yes, as I said hanging on the coat tails of actually respected people in an attempt to regain any credibility he had by all his blabbing and invading everyone's else's privacy.

VixenTodd · 28/03/2023 11:02

Rhondaa · 28/03/2023 10:57

'The Baroness and Harry hugged inside the courtroom as noted by journalists'

Yes, as I said hanging on the coat tails of actually respected people in an attempt to regain any credibility he had by all his blabbing and invading everyone's else's privacy.

That is what him and Meghan have done to push their way up all along.

Sweetpeasaremadeforbees · 28/03/2023 11:04

It's all over the papers! And in the media. It is unusual for her to be part of this, and no one knew about her hacking.
It is everywhere I have read.

And Harry is the headline. The others are mentioned almost in passing (from what I've seen Sadie Frost and Liz Hurley aren't even mentioned in some of the reports).

But there's no point in arguing, you think he's an asset to the case, I think he's a distraction currently. We're never going to agree.

Roussette · 28/03/2023 11:10

Sweetpeasaremadeforbees · 28/03/2023 11:04

It's all over the papers! And in the media. It is unusual for her to be part of this, and no one knew about her hacking.
It is everywhere I have read.

And Harry is the headline. The others are mentioned almost in passing (from what I've seen Sadie Frost and Liz Hurley aren't even mentioned in some of the reports).

But there's no point in arguing, you think he's an asset to the case, I think he's a distraction currently. We're never going to agree.

No we're not.

Back upthread there is an article I or someone else linked purely about Sadie Frost and Liz Hurley.

Whaeanui · 28/03/2023 11:11

hanging on the coat tails of actually respected people

what a juvenile comment. She hugged him also. You have literally zero idea of their relationship and insult the Baroness at the same time. You may not respect Harry, but plenty of people do especially the others who have endured this intrusion.

Whaeanui · 28/03/2023 11:13

I’m going to keep posting about the actual case and related news despite attempts to make this yet another I hate Harry thread. You have enough of those. Go there. The sheer hypocrisy of ANL to ask to keep documents of theirs confidential in this case, while:

In a libel case it is currently fighting, brought by Prince Harry, Associated is defending an article that was headlined: ‘Exclusive: How Prince Harry tried to keep his legal fight with the government over police bodyguards a secret…’ The article went on to accuse the prince of ‘seeking far-reaching confidentiality’ and of ‘trying to keep details of his legal battle about police protection private’.

Rhondaa · 28/03/2023 11:15

'I’m going to keep posting about the actual case and related news despite attempts to make this yet another I hate Harry thread.'

Well as a pp said why not post in legal or chat? This is in the royal topic so as such will focus on Harold. Nobody hates him btw, just 'hate' his appalling hypocritical behaviour.

Serenster · 28/03/2023 11:17

The claimants are a group, known to each other with the same lawyer

They aren’t all using the same lawyer, actually. And each claim is separate.

Aldi, it’s not at all uncommon for litigants to run completely contradictory arguments in different claims. You will run whatever argument gives you the best chance of winning. So someone can quite easily claim that a document should be confidential in one hearing, and that another document should be disclosed in another.

VixenTodd · 28/03/2023 11:19

They aren’t all using the same lawyer, actually. And each claim is separate.

Praise be! you get stans fighting aggressively and feeling clever when they don't even get the very basics or which papers are involved.

Whaeanui · 28/03/2023 11:31

*Baroness Doreen Lawrence feels a “deep sense of betrayal” over Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL) allegedly hiring private investigators to “unlawfully or illegally” obtain her private information, her lawyers said.
She now wonders whether trusting the Daily Mail over its “entirely false” support for her fight for justice “caused her to have failed her murdered son”, the court was told.
In her High Court breach of privacy claim against ANL, brought alongside other high-profile individuals, she claims there was “illegal interception” of her voicemail messages and that her phone was tapped between 1993 and 2007.
She also alleges her bank accounts and phone bills were monitored, that she was subject to “covert electronic surveillance” and that “corrupt payments” were made to serving police officers for confidential information, including to those investigating her son’s killing.
ANL says it firmly denies that unlawful information gathering took place at its newspapers, and the legal claims against it are being brought too late.
Baroness Lawrence joined Sir Elton John and the Duke of Sussex for the first of a four-day preliminary hearing in their cases at the High Court in London on Monday.

Barrister David Sherborne, representing Baroness Lawrence, said in written submissions that she and her family were targeted “both before and during” the Daily Mail’s Justice for Stephen Lawrence Campaign.
Alleged unlawful activity included a private investigator monitoring her bank accounts “specifically to check whether (she) was receiving ‘buy up’ money from and/or working with other newspapers” during the campaign.
Mr Sherborne said Baroness Lawrence “never once suspected” ANL of the allegations because it had “professed to help her”, but she believed information in some of the newspaper’s articles came from “those nearest and dearest to her” or police sources.
“The impact of this belief was profound, damaging professional and personal relationships that could have been genuine and could have helped to bring her son’s killers to account,” Mr Sherborne said.
He added that Baroness Lawrence feels “haunted by the fact that she will never know the true impact of the Daily Mail’s unlawful acts and unlawful articles on her fight for justice for Stephen”.
“She wonders whether trusting the Daily Mail as she did caused her to have delayed or have failed her murdered son.”
Baroness Lawrence “feels anger, shock and upset” at the newspaper’s alleged actions which were “deliberately concealed” from her, Mr Sherborne added.*

Note, Mr Sherborne representing her, as he is Harry.

Samcro · 28/03/2023 11:31

Roussette · 28/03/2023 10:43

Excuse me. The thread title is about fighting the Daily Mail in a court case. Are we not allowed to mention the others in the case?

Very inconvenient for you that there are more than Harry involved in all of this. It rather holds up the 'we hate Harry' posts doesn't it...
Sorry 'bout that.....

(I have no idea what a 'loony lib ground levelling exercise is')

And no I won't start a seperate thread about Baronness Lawrence. It would be overtaken by Harry dislikers anyway.

well said.

Samcro · 28/03/2023 11:32

VixenTodd · 28/03/2023 11:02

That is what him and Meghan have done to push their way up all along.

was Meghan there? I missed that,

Whaeanui · 28/03/2023 11:33

Sherborne who also represents John’s husband, David Furnish, and actresses Liz Hurley and Sadie Frost, said the intrusions were “habitual and widespread” and later “concealed or covered up.”

Plitvice · 28/03/2023 11:34

🙄

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread