Did William really cheat on Kate?

[ttcstop]

I keep hearing this rumour and I'm just curious to know where it comes from? Where is the evidence?

You know they are kept at arms length. They are no longer treated as part of a loving family.

That is not a loving family. It's an extremely dysfunctional one who has treated H & M appallingly. You may not choose to believe that. However, if you look at it closely around Charles, you will see it for what it is. Appalling.

H & M have every right to respond to the daily tirade of abuse they have had, including the racism from the media fed by certain offices of the royals of lied and twisted truthes.

Whilst you're saying xyz, remember Charles went on TV and commissioned a book by David Dimberlby, which slated his childhood whilst partially admitting to the affair with Camilla

I say partially as he only admitted from 1986. It's a proven fact that he never broke up with Camilla and was with her the night before he married Diana.

It isn't a loving family

How is it proven?

@keffie12.
If course it's not. Charles childhood sounds awful and lonely and cold.

He's warm but so inward looking!

I wonder if he really appreciates himself as a father and what Harry has had to endure?
The only person I can see who would help Charles is William and he's furious with Harry or camilla and it's not in her interest to promote or help Harry.

I just can't ever grasp that anyone with the merest stretch of any imagination think that Harry has had it good in anyway.

Why is the DM ( the Mirror and Express followed suit ) publishing a non story about Rose Hanbury's father not being allowed on a Ryanair flight to Europe as his passport is out of date for such a flight 🙄

Because you're talking about it.

Wasn’t one of Rose’s children one of the cape carriers for Charles?

One pot.

One spoon.

GO!!!!!!!!

Giles Coren is a friend of the Soho Club crowd who Meghan is close to as well.

So let me get this straight.

A new 'notanother' poster just turned up and is using the exact same words I used before, after making some rather iffy statements?

MN users are a joke, surely 😂😂

Cross post, I just told MNHQ and they zapped the imposter quickly just now.

Thank you.

Yes. One of the twins apparently. His father was QE2's Lord Great Chamberlain. On Queen Elizabeth's death he was promoted to a Knight Grand Cross of the Royal Victorian Order whatever that means.

Don't know what I said wrong but are the moderators members of the RF?

Well it must be true. I know people will scoff but the Daily Telegraph is very quickly deleting comments that mention the alleged affair. I think there's a super injunction. I'm no fan or Harry or Meghan but why is it that readers are given free rein in the comment section but not William and Kate.

There is no injunction, super or otherwise. An injunction would only have jurisdiction in England/Wales. If there was any truth in the matter the press/individuals in Scotland, and, oh, you know, the rest of the world, would be publishing the salacious facts all over the front pages. Which they're not.

Not sure what your last sentence means, but if it's that the Telegraph are removing comments suggesting William had an affair, did it ever cross your mind it might be because he didn't and the comments are libellous?

I'm not sure you can claim the Telegraph is biased against Harry and Meghan following Bryony Gordon's puff piece earlier in the year.

Sorry that was poorly phrased. I notice in newspapers that readers are allowed to say what they like about Harry and Meghan but in articles about Kate and William, the comments seem to be heavily moderated.

Big difference. H&m have given interviews, magazine articles, podcasts, autobiography(ies)
W&k never deliberately give out info, so there is so much more to REACT to in the case of h&m. This is obvious surely.

I notice in newspapers that readers are allowed to say what they like about Harry and Meghan but in articles about Kate and William, the comments seem to be heavily moderated.

It depends on what is going on behind the scenes, often. To take the alleged affair story, it was rumoured that when the speculation started William’s lawyers sent a strongly worded letter to various media outfits warning them that the allegations were untrue, and any speculation published about it was defamatory. That would stop most media companies in the UK from allowing speculation to be either published by them, or hosted on their online platforms, as they don’t want to be sued when they have no evidence to support their position.

Overseas media companies aren’t bothered by the threat of being sued in the UK, so have published the speculation - though they are always careful to make it clear it’s just rumours that they are reporting on.

Meghan and Harry have taken steps to stop publication of certain things in the UK too - there was a story on the Mail a few weeks back that was literally up for a couple of hours and then poof! - it vanished. The most likely explanation for that is a letter from the lawyers for the Sussexes complaining it was untrue and they wanted it gone or they’d sue.

It’s not true & horrible that people are treating a named woman as collateral in their vendetta against a random couple they don’t like

Why are you so confident it's not true?

Haven't you noticed that Harry has been very mindful not to disclose other people's private or personal business? I've been wondering why other people don't see this. He seems to have quite high moral standards so, although his book seems to disclose all these secrets, for the most part he discloses things that relate to his story and personal and psychological development. He talks about broad issues rather than giving you the nitty gritty of gossip. I think that's why the memoir is so self deprecating - why he talks about his knob and stuff. He's careful to disclose more about himself than other members of the royal family. He gives us a few snippets. I found that really quite fascinating. Even more fascinating was the way the press rounded on him for betraying the royal family when, reading between the lines, he could have revealed much more explosive material.

Can't say I've read it and I do read a lot of shit. I'll buy it if I can get it for 99p