Has anyone ever met Megan?

[MsMiaWallace]

Out of curiosity as many people are airing views about her. But what is she actually like in the flesh?
I'm not a fan at all but she comes across as lovely when interviewed

It’s not a question of taking good care of them. I’m talking about what the children will learn about families, relationships and emotions.
Growing up not knowing any of your fathers family and only one member of your mothers family is sad.

They are loved children and that's what matters. Families are complicated and the posts on here pitying Archie and Lilli who have two loving parents and a doting GM are unpleasant but nothing surprises me anymore.

It's just yet another horrible way to criticise H&M. Through their children.

@Itsnottime You know they are in contact with other family members.

I grew up though only really having anything to do with one extended family member as a child. Most lived abroad. It was fine and no one needed to feel sorry for me.

Hmm...I just... dunno!
I recon they are worth more money as a couple and that will tend to encourage them to stay together, surely she couldn't be cruel to him, it'd be like kicking a puppy! And she wouldn't want to ruin her disney princess image, I think she'll play it smart and avoid anything ugly🙏
Or maybe another woman will lure poor Harry away?😱I think she'd have to be some kind of mermaid😂

They appear very much in love and they have two children together. Like most families they will want to make their marriage work and are starting from a place of love.

Well her last husband got the Dear John message when her wedding and engagement rings were Fed Exed to him so yes, yes she absolutely can kick him to the curb without a second glance. Harry’s already screwed himself with this mortifying book. I don’t think it’s an accident. I think a loving partner would discourage you from including so much humiliation in a book for publication.

@Eyerollcentral That is such an odd comment. Do you think Meghan should have kept the rings?
She didn't dump him by fedex you know, just sent the rings back.
Or was she supposed to have a last tearful lunch to hand the rings back?

According to the Tom Bower book she sent the rings back to him without even a note. That’s how he learned his marriage was over. And yes I would expect at least the courtesy of a face to face meeting from my spouse to tell me it was over, would you not?

@BethJ62 no, that's weird, why do you ask?

As if Meghan would be telling an author making money out of her for a book exactly what happened when her marriage split up.

It suits Bowers' narrative to make it like this. According to cuts no ice with me. Unless Meghan confided in him exactly what happened.

Well she is a super litigious woman who she’s at the drop of the hat. She hasn’t sued him yet has she? The author is an investigative journalist. He doesn’t tend to just make things up. He has backed up the story with at least three other contemporaneous sources who all say this happened. Deranged to say ‘according to cuts no ice with me’, how else would you like me to refer to sources outside this thread? Bizarre.

But let’s supposing you accept it is true, what’s your take on it then?

I will accept it's true if I hear from her ex husband, an American who has never said one word against her.

Not an English guy called Tom Bower who professes to know the ins and outs of the end of their marriage.

Does anyone ever know that about anyone who ends a marriage, even those close to them? NO.

You are calling her litigious because she sued The Sun and won?

I’m calling her litigious because she has pursued multiple court cases. Do you think she has only pursued the one?

And btw litigious isn’t an insult. It’s a reflection of fact.
Leaving that aside what’s your opinion on sending wedding and engagement rings back to someone by post as a way of saying our marriage is over?

Meghan and her ex had split up. They were living apart. What is the big deal about posting the rings back? Are you saying she should have returned them over a tearful lunch date?

She has won multiple cases.

So yes you agree she has pursued multiple cases, that’s what I said? Yet she hasn’t sued in relation to anything printed in Tom Bower’s book. Do you not see the anamoly?

It was news to him apparently that they had split up, that’s the whole point. And would you really not have a face to face meeting with your spouse if you were ending the marriage? Don’t know where you get the idea they had already split or why you are fixated on tearful lunch dates.

Ps they were living apart for almost the entire duration of their marriage as she was filming in Canada. They weren’t living apart because they had split up

apparently being the operative word here.

We don't know. No one does. I don't even know the final sort of conversation my sister had when her and her DH of decades split up, so I'm sure Bower knows nothing

"Royal biographer Andrew Morton claims in Meghan: A Hollywood Princess, that she posted back her wedding and engagement rings to Trevor after ending their marriage 'out of the blue'."

www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-11521995/Who-Meghans-ex-husband-Trevor-Engelson-did-split.html

That does not say she ended the relationship by posting back the rings. The she ended it out of the blue sounds like every clueless man who ignores what his wife is telling him and claims he has no reason why the marriage ended.

I mean publishers generally won’t publish controversial statements in books unless they can show that they had reason to believe them to be true. On that basis alone it’s bonkers to say the author ‘knows nothing’. He will have to have demonstrated that he believes he can support what he has printed should action be taken against the publisher. He also shows his sources in the book. I don’t understand your difficulty in accepting that this happened? It would be pretty easy to disprove if it was untrue.
Also at least two people - Meghan and her ex husband - know what happened. And the people who they discussed the matter with again know what they told them. I don’t suppose an investigative reporter has looked in to the final conversation of your sister’s divorce so I don’t really see the relevance here.

That’s a totally different book to the one I have referred to. Interesting though that they both appear to say exactly the same thing.
Yes of course it’s her husband’s fault. Totally unreasonable reach there for you to assume he is a clueless man who ignored his wife. YOU have absolutely no basis to say that but have derided an author who has actually researched and provided supporting sources for his claims. Whatever way you look at it, it’s pretty brutal.
Normal people can see that people they admire are human and can make errors throughout their lives, as we all do. I do not understand the reluctance of many people to accept this of Meghan. It makes the whole story around her less believeable

This is a pathetic conversation. Of course Meghan did this or that or the other. She has to be painted as the evil woman, the nasty individual in every single thing on here.

"I do not understand the reluctance of many people to accept this of Meghan" Personally I do not understand the reluctance of many people to accept that Meghan might not be guilty of every single thing quoted about her by someone out to make money from a book.

No one knows apart from the ex and her.