Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Has anyone ever met Megan?

410 replies

MsMiaWallace · 09/01/2023 15:15

Out of curiosity as many people are airing views about her. But what is she actually like in the flesh?
I'm not a fan at all but she comes across as lovely when interviewed

OP posts:
Justasec321 · 10/01/2023 15:06

Orangefir · 10/01/2023 14:52

They are estranged. They don’t communicate, he lives on a different continent, he no longer works for the firm.

He is no longer the RFs problem. Inc his security concerns

Welll actually you could argue that he is now a bigger problem for them....

They hit him where he feels most vunerable - security for his family.

They had to have known that.

It reads like strategy.

Gloves came right off.

King Charles is proving himself to be an ineffective leader and diplomat.

Keep in mind that King Charles has kept security for Prince Andrew.

That is a massive statement to his son.

What is the point of a family at the top of the pyramid of our society if they are worse than most??

Orangefir · 10/01/2023 15:11

Justasec321 · 10/01/2023 15:06

Welll actually you could argue that he is now a bigger problem for them....

They hit him where he feels most vunerable - security for his family.

They had to have known that.

It reads like strategy.

Gloves came right off.

King Charles is proving himself to be an ineffective leader and diplomat.

Keep in mind that King Charles has kept security for Prince Andrew.

That is a massive statement to his son.

What is the point of a family at the top of the pyramid of our society if they are worse than most??

You seem to completely misunderstand that it isn’t the RF who decide who gets protection from officers from the MET. That’s a governmental review panel. Why? Because it’s tax payers money and the government has to be accountable. He doesn’t work for the RF, therefore he doesn’t get the business perks

Justasec321 · 10/01/2023 15:12

Orangefir · 10/01/2023 08:11

Your point - that the queen is heavily protected therefore she would not feel paranoia about people knowing her address of Buck Palace.

The same is applied to Harry. People may know his address but he will also be heavily protected by armed security. So why the paranoia?

keep up

True the Queen, now King is heavliy protected so less paranoia.

But - she does not have to pay for it.

We do.

So that worry about affording it does not come into play for them.

He on the other hand now needs to pay for it.

Anyone have any idea how much that would cost?

I dont but would think you are in the millions per year.

Roussette · 10/01/2023 15:15

Orangefir · 10/01/2023 15:11

You seem to completely misunderstand that it isn’t the RF who decide who gets protection from officers from the MET. That’s a governmental review panel. Why? Because it’s tax payers money and the government has to be accountable. He doesn’t work for the RF, therefore he doesn’t get the business perks

Nor does Prince Andrew

He gets the 'business perks'.

DogBowlsAreMyWeapon · 10/01/2023 15:16

The MET aren’t for hire - and even if they were - how would you feel if it were YOUR partner being shipped out to the US for months on end to fetch starbucks?

Orangefir · 10/01/2023 15:16

Roussette · 10/01/2023 15:15

Nor does Prince Andrew

He gets the 'business perks'.

Not any more he doesn’t. It’s pulled. Any security from now will have to be paid privately. It therefore won’t be officers from the MET who are allowed to carry weapons.

Itsnottime · 10/01/2023 15:17

Justasec321 · 10/01/2023 15:06

Welll actually you could argue that he is now a bigger problem for them....

They hit him where he feels most vunerable - security for his family.

They had to have known that.

It reads like strategy.

Gloves came right off.

King Charles is proving himself to be an ineffective leader and diplomat.

Keep in mind that King Charles has kept security for Prince Andrew.

That is a massive statement to his son.

What is the point of a family at the top of the pyramid of our society if they are worse than most??

Just how do you think security would have been provided by the Met in LA?

ZombieKettle · 10/01/2023 15:18

This was posted on Instagram by a TV director back in 2021.

Has anyone ever met Megan?
Has anyone ever met Megan?
Has anyone ever met Megan?
Orangefir · 10/01/2023 15:19

Justasec321 · 10/01/2023 15:12

True the Queen, now King is heavliy protected so less paranoia.

But - she does not have to pay for it.

We do.

So that worry about affording it does not come into play for them.

He on the other hand now needs to pay for it.

Anyone have any idea how much that would cost?

I dont but would think you are in the millions per year.

I understand it’s taxpayer funded. But that’s the deal with working royals.

The argument has been thus far that Harry needs the specialised protection from royal protection officers. I’m saying he doesn’t and that private security is adequate in US

Roussette · 10/01/2023 15:20

Orangefir · 10/01/2023 15:16

Not any more he doesn’t. It’s pulled. Any security from now will have to be paid privately. It therefore won’t be officers from the MET who are allowed to carry weapons.

Last I heard, Charles may remove his security, it hasn't happened yet. Unless I've missed it.

It is 'expected' to happen. It 'may' happen. According to news reports. And if it does, Charles will be paying for it, is that from Duchy funds I wonder.

Orangefir · 10/01/2023 15:21

Roussette · 10/01/2023 15:20

Last I heard, Charles may remove his security, it hasn't happened yet. Unless I've missed it.

It is 'expected' to happen. It 'may' happen. According to news reports. And if it does, Charles will be paying for it, is that from Duchy funds I wonder.

He can use his chalet money for all I care. As long as im not paying for it

MissMarpleRocks · 10/01/2023 15:24

Even if PA security is to funded by the MET, It’s also not an apple to apple comparison. PA lives in the U.K. PH in the USA. Costs will be completely different.

Justasec321 · 10/01/2023 15:24

notimagain · 10/01/2023 08:31

I am not an expert in narcissisim but re the paranoia about security - did you know that the Daily Mail had a map on their front page on the web that pined their address?
They also ran a another map with a huge arrow pointing to their house and had picture of the front?

..and? This really isn't top secret stuff..I'd be pretty sure just about every realtor and taxi driver in that part of the world knows where they live.

I suspect even without the DM or hints from the locals some could work it out by geolocation using images M&H have published.

I am sure that you are correct about the realtors and cabbies. And your point about the locals and geo location is valid.

That is very different to one of the largest newspapers on line, one with about 24 million visits a month advertising where you you live.

These people, love 'em or hate 'em have recieved credible threats against their lives from a variety of people. Some have gone to prison for it.

Viscount Rothemere owns the paper. he is very good friends with Charles and Camilla.

They could have a quiet word no?

Justasec321 · 10/01/2023 15:30

Undaunted77 · 10/01/2023 10:37

on the contrary… her wedding was notable for the absence of old friends and family. Her guest list was made up of celebs who had only met her once or twice and seemed a bit bemused to have been invited, and the more famous of her former co-workers in Suits.

This is often said.

But how do you know?

If it was notable for the absence of old friends I would love to know who they are and how you know that.

We know the famous ones cause they are in the papers - but the rest?

Was the guest list public?

Justasec321 · 10/01/2023 15:36

Orangefir · 10/01/2023 14:59

Yes but she never developed paranoia about her safety did she.
She had security to reflect her status and Harry now has his- his celeb bouncers.

Fair to say that she never (seemed) to develope paranoia about her security.

Fair also to say that none of her parenst died a violent death due to lack of/poor security.

Justasec321 · 10/01/2023 15:38

Orangefir · 10/01/2023 15:11

You seem to completely misunderstand that it isn’t the RF who decide who gets protection from officers from the MET. That’s a governmental review panel. Why? Because it’s tax payers money and the government has to be accountable. He doesn’t work for the RF, therefore he doesn’t get the business perks

Charles pays for Andrew;s security.

Orangefir · 10/01/2023 15:39

Justasec321 · 10/01/2023 15:36

Fair to say that she never (seemed) to develope paranoia about her security.

Fair also to say that none of her parenst died a violent death due to lack of/poor security.

You understand that Diana chose to turn down police protection post divorce? That was her choice.

Orangefir · 10/01/2023 15:41

Justasec321 · 10/01/2023 15:38

Charles pays for Andrew;s security.

It’s certainly been suggested but it’s never been confirmed. I’m sure PA will have receive inheritance from his mother that could cover any costs

purpledalmation · 10/01/2023 15:41

I'm sure in person she appears warm, attractive and interesting. However, she is an actress and it's likely to be an act. However, most people do the same.

What's that thing about, it's not how you treat your equals, it's how you treat the servants, that shows your true character.

Justasec321 · 10/01/2023 15:44

DogBowlsAreMyWeapon · 10/01/2023 15:16

The MET aren’t for hire - and even if they were - how would you feel if it were YOUR partner being shipped out to the US for months on end to fetch starbucks?

I would not like it at all Dogs.

But I am not talking about the MET.

His father pays for PA security.

The King is proving himslef very ineffective to me.

This, you could argue, is his first big test. Reign (geddit?teehee) in the family.

He seems utterly incapable of leadership or diplomacy.

And yet....he is King.....

Looks to me now that his legacy will be this nightmare and the loss of the Comonwealth.

Itsnottime · 10/01/2023 15:49

Security is armed in the US. It would be ridiculous for Charles to pay for personal security overseas from private bodyguards who are armed from tax payers money. We aren’t sure who is paying for PAs security but surely he has money of his own?

Justasec321 · 10/01/2023 15:51

Orangefir · 10/01/2023 15:41

It’s certainly been suggested but it’s never been confirmed. I’m sure PA will have receive inheritance from his mother that could cover any costs

Indeed.

Because Prince Andrew has a such a good reputation for spening money wisely and being honest.

Blossomtoes · 10/01/2023 15:51

It’s way too early to start making predictions about the King’s legacy. The only person responsible for this “nightmare” is Harold and it looks to me as if public sympathy is fairly and squarely behind his poor bloody family who deserve all the medals you can get on their chests for having to tolerate him all this time.

Justasec321 · 10/01/2023 15:55

Orangefir · 10/01/2023 15:39

You understand that Diana chose to turn down police protection post divorce? That was her choice.

It has certainly been reported that way.

But don;t we also know that she was fearful of the family once she decided to divorce?

I do not mean fearful in terms of fearing for her life rather fearful that she would loose custody, fearful that they would have their staff spy and report, fearful of things that fall within the realm of possibility.

With that optic in mind her refusal may seem less irrational.

Justasec321 · 10/01/2023 15:58

Blossomtoes · 10/01/2023 15:51

It’s way too early to start making predictions about the King’s legacy. The only person responsible for this “nightmare” is Harold and it looks to me as if public sympathy is fairly and squarely behind his poor bloody family who deserve all the medals you can get on their chests for having to tolerate him all this time.

Well Blossom - we will have to wait and see how it plays out.

But when I look I see someone who is very hurt.

I see a family that closed rank against him.

I see a newspaper industry that feasted on her.

I see lack of leadership in our King.