Are the Royal Family releasing info from SPARE to cover up Diana accusations?

[BradfordGirl]

This is an extraordinary article that presents new information outlining why Princess Diana's death was not the accident it first appeared. Ordinarily this would be front page news and everyone would be talking about it. Instead people are talking about if Meghan used the term baby brain to Kate, or if William and Harry did not want Charles and Camilla to marry.

These latter allegations are just meaningless distractions. The kind of thing that happens in every family. But the allegation that a car accident for Diana was planned is a serious allegation. And the only people who benefit from burying this story are the Royal Family.

So I think the Royal Family have arranged for an advance copy of SPARE to be leaked so extracts can be leaked every hour, thus burying the story about Diana's death.

I think the allegations around Diana's death are probably true.

"Extraordinarily, since the Princess's death, I have been told by a well-placed source in our foreign intelligence service, MI6, that this is not far from the truth of what really happened.
The astonishing claim is that a 'Paris operation' was organised to frighten the Princess into halting her romance because her lover was considered by the British Establishment to be an unsuitable companion for the mother of a future King.
'We planned to break her arm or cause a minor injury,' said my MI6 informant, now retired and living in Europe. 'No one in the security services overseeing this operation wanted Diana to be killed. Dodi? Well, he was another matter.'""

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11596307/SUE-REID-DID-researchers-Harrys-new-memoir-quiz-Dianas-death-crash.html

I agree with most of what you said, apart from there being no self retracting seatbelts then. My first car mid 80’s had them. And it wasn’t new. Pretty sure they’ve been around most of my life.

How could they be sure she wouldn't wear her seatbelt? A car crash is not a guarantee of killing/harming someone. The only one to survive was the one wearing his seatbelt. No way to ensure that she wouldn't wear it.

Products that have a release date, particularly when it’s a physical product, will often have leaks. Somebody will break that release date given the pure scale. There will be thousands of stores with wrapped pallets waiting. They may be sanctioned for future releases but it’s super common. Now it might not often end up in the presses hands, but it’s tough with a book as it can be easily reproduced in text rather than something like a toy or game or electrical item.

DNA analysis then still took some time and was complex. It was 26 years ago that Diana died.

OP I read that article and there are no new theories or allegations in it.

Every one of these theories was tried and explored at the Inquest in 2007 (?) - absolutely every part of it. Didn't you follow it at the time?

The transcript of every word was published the next day. Anyone could read them if they cared to. I did as I was interested in the proceedings.

All explained and dismissed.

The only strand left untied is the white Fiat Uno believed to have scraped the Mercedes, driven by a man with a large dog in the passenger seat (according to witnesses). It is likely that it is the car that the owner had resprayed red the next day, but he refutes being involved and there is no suggestion that there was any deliberation on his part.

@BradfordGirl okkkaayy.... So the men in grey suits at Buckingham palace now control Spanish bookshops, they also controlled and affected the outcome of a french investigation and the French police. They hired a hit man to scare Diana.

Backs away slowly.......😂

"Extraordinarily, since the Princess's death, I have been told by a well-placed source in our foreign intelligence service, MI6, that this is not far from the truth of what really happened.
The astonishing claim is that a 'Paris operation' was organised to frighten the Princess into halting her romance because her lover was considered by the British Establishment to be an unsuitable companion for the mother of a future King.
'We planned to break her arm or cause a minor injury,' said my MI6 informant, now retired and living in Europe. 'No one in the security services overseeing this operation wanted Diana to be killed

I'm trying very hard to see some logic in the plan this alleged MI6 source has allegedly recounted. He/she reckons that they were going to stage an accident that would end up with Diana having a broken arm (and how would they ensure that?) and she'd immediately think 'OMG, this car crash and broken arm - it's a sign from God that I need to ditch Dodi' (which if you believe Rosa Monckton she was planning to do anyway)'because the ILs don't approve of him!'

I mean, really? pull the other one. If Dodi was regarded as unsuitable (which is much more likely to be because of his father), then why didn't MI6 go after Hasnat Khan?

THey have also bought the silence of all the medical staff at the Salpetriere hospital and at least one priest, don't forget.

Well the government will be ecstatic that everyone's going to be talking about this book instead of the mess this country's in due to their incompetence.

So I'm going to speculate that Sushi Sunak is behind the leak.

(I'm not serious by the way)

No, OP, they are not.

The British security services are and were actually quite overstretched trying to prevent terrorist attacks and deal with Russian spies and Chinese hacking. They do not have the time or inclination to attack British citizens, especially the mother of the future king. And only a total total idiot would cause a car crash but expect to control the extent of the injuries in the car crash.

Maybe put your tin foil hat back on 🙄 this crappy conspiracy theory has been trotted out sooooo many times 🥱

If you really believe that British governmental departments do this kind of thing then I suggest you move to a different country.

And only a total total idiot would cause a car crash but expect to control the extent of the injuries in the car crash

This. She might just have easily crawled out without a scratch. Same with shooting someone - you can shoot someone in the head and they survive. Shoor them in the leg, nick and artery and they bleed to death. The human body is tough.

This 'MI6 source' sounds like bar-room bravado.

Why would the medical staff need to be silenced? They treated the injuries sustained. Nobody is denying what the medical staff would know. No idea what the Priest knows.

The book was released early in Spain. People have managed to get hold of a few copies and are translating it.

Surely the whole point of is not to control the injuries, but to send a warning. Diana had a fear of being in an 'accident that wasn't an accident'. It seems unlikely that the security services didn't know that. The outcome of 'accidents' is never clear, see use of polonium, any poison (not saying this is similar to Russians, just that the outcome of arranged accidents is rarely straightforward, otherwise you have to come right out and obviously murder the person).

Well if you're going to bribe everyone to keep quiet then you don't leave loose ends, do you? 🙄even the RF can't bump off everybody.

I don't understand why the medical staff would need bribing, the accident happened, she wasn't wearing a seatbelt. That's not in doubt. The doubt is whether anything in the tunnel triggered this beyond an accident.

If William and Harry knew their mother had been killed on instructions of RF they would never have spoke to their father again. It is a load of rubbish. Diana was not wearing her seatbelt and driver going too fast. That is the truth. It is horrible for Charles and William to hear Harry with all his mental health issues, suggest the RF plotted to have Diana killed. He is unbalanced. Also on the one hand saying he married for love implying other royals had not, whilst at same time pleading with his Dad not to marry love of his life Camilla. Harry the hypocrite. The RF can't forgive Harry this time. He has gone too far. King Charles should strip him of his titles with help from parliament and uninvite him from his coronation. H&M are both paranoid, self obsessed narcissist. I don't believe a word they say. They are always changing their story.

It was said that the rear seatbelts didn't work on the car. The car itself wasn't fit for the road, having been pretty much written off in a crash two years earlier. As I understand it, the wreck was sold and repaired then bought by the limo company that was contracted to the Paris Ritz. Drivers of VVIP's and HNW individuals hold a special licence and are trained to drive at high speed if there is a threat to the Principal. They are a select group and word is that when they discussed the accident among themselves, there were those that knew the S class Mercedes that Diana was in and that the vehicle was highly dangerous and unfit for any speeds above 40mph!
This is just one article" www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/princess-diana-paris-car-killed-in-travelling-hugely-dangerous-rebuilt-wreck-reports-henri-paul-pascal-rostain-mercedes-a7765356.html
As I understand it, Henri Paul was the General Manager of the hôtel and not one of their chauffeurs. Fwiw, a French documentary cast some reasonable doubt as to him being drunk, but either way she should never have been in that car.
I also feel that tragic though it was for Al Fayed, the arrangements should have been absolutely watertight for Diana whatever the circumstances.

For the avoidance of any doubt, my comment about bribing the medical staff was a sarcastic reply to @rumship's comment that people appear to think the RF controls everything. It REALLY wasn't meant to be taken as gospel and puzzled over

*okkkaayy.... So the men in grey suits at Buckingham palace now control Spanish bookshops, they also controlled and affected the outcome of a french investigation and the French police. They hired a hit man to scare Diana.

Backs away slowly*

I do believe the palace has released info in the past.

I do not believe they are releasing info from Spare.

IMO it is just a fortuitous coincidence that the book was accidentally put for sale early.

The aim could be not to kill Diana, but knowing they were taking a risk and being fine with that.

My guess is that if Harry or William had any doubts, they would think the security services acted alone and not on the direct orders of the RF, although they may not believe anything of the sort.

Harry went to a medium to contact Diana so I don't know if he's the best judge of the rational in this scenario.

It's probably the Spanish Royal Family that own La Casa Del Libro....

Distant cousins though....(taps side of nose knowingly)