Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Are the Royal Family releasing info from SPARE to cover up Diana accusations?

138 replies

BradfordGirl · 05/01/2023 14:58

This is an extraordinary article that presents new information outlining why Princess Diana's death was not the accident it first appeared. Ordinarily this would be front page news and everyone would be talking about it. Instead people are talking about if Meghan used the term baby brain to Kate, or if William and Harry did not want Charles and Camilla to marry.

These latter allegations are just meaningless distractions. The kind of thing that happens in every family. But the allegation that a car accident for Diana was planned is a serious allegation. And the only people who benefit from burying this story are the Royal Family.

So I think the Royal Family have arranged for an advance copy of SPARE to be leaked so extracts can be leaked every hour, thus burying the story about Diana's death.

I think the allegations around Diana's death are probably true.

"Extraordinarily, since the Princess's death, I have been told by a well-placed source in our foreign intelligence service, MI6, that this is not far from the truth of what really happened.
The astonishing claim is that a 'Paris operation' was organised to frighten the Princess into halting her romance because her lover was considered by the British Establishment to be an unsuitable companion for the mother of a future King.
'We planned to break her arm or cause a minor injury,' said my MI6 informant, now retired and living in Europe. 'No one in the security services overseeing this operation wanted Diana to be killed. Dodi? Well, he was another matter.'""

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11596307/SUE-REID-DID-researchers-Harrys-new-memoir-quiz-Dianas-death-crash.html

OP posts:
Insaneinthemembraneee · 05/01/2023 16:18

She died because she got in a car with a drunk driver & didn't wear a seatbelt while being chased by American paps in Paris 🥴

But yeah of course that's 100% the RF's fault; how could it not be? 🤨

BradfordGirl · 05/01/2023 16:20

Nobody is saying the Royal Family went to Spain.
But if a car accident can be planned for Diana, then it is easy to get hold early of a copy of a soon to be published book.

OP posts:
ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 05/01/2023 16:20

Why would they need to scare her off? She had lots of boyfriends, she would undoubtedly have moved on from Dodi.

BradfordGirl · 05/01/2023 16:21

@Insaneinthemembraneee The plan was not to kill Diana, but just to engineer a small accident. It is because Diana was not wearing her seatbelt that the plan failed and she die.

OP posts:
60smusic · 05/01/2023 16:22

I'm not sure if the RF are leaking parts, but I do think they have a copy, I would say they have their people reading /or read it already. They would need to be prepared for what was going to be printed. They're not going to ignore it or wait for the papers to release bits of it. I'm sure there's been a lot of discussions over this. But in saying that you just don't know, if they have these 'arrangements' with newspapers, there could be truth in what you're saying.

JanusTheFirst · 05/01/2023 16:23

Stop embarrassing yourself with conspiracy lunacy, OP.

Insaneinthemembraneee · 05/01/2023 16:25

@BradfordGirl No it's because she was drunk, her driver was drunk and the American press were reprimanded for chasing her car. THE AMERICAN PRESS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE UK OR THE RF OR THE BRITISH PRESS!

BradfordGirl · 05/01/2023 16:29

Have you read the article? It talks about evidence that shows the driver was not drunk.

OP posts:
brassbells · 05/01/2023 16:33

The book is out in Spanish in Spain so the journalists can see it there and Google translate it into English

BradfordGirl · 05/01/2023 16:35

The Spanish release date is the same as other countries. So any copies available should not have been released yet.

OP posts:
brassbells · 05/01/2023 16:37

I saw photos of it on sale in a shop like WHSMITHS

It might have been a mistake but still happened according to the photos

LivelyBlake · 05/01/2023 16:38

The royal family own La Casa del Libro. That’s news to me.

scaredysquiggle · 05/01/2023 16:39

Spanish bookshop this morning. Hope that helps

Wonnle · 05/01/2023 16:40

It's BACOFOIL HAT time again !

BradfordGirl · 05/01/2023 16:41

LivelyBlake · 05/01/2023 16:38

The royal family own La Casa del Libro. That’s news to me.

What!! The Royal Family own a small chain of Spanish bookshops and "accidentally" Harry's book has been released early in some Spanish bookshops.

OP posts:
BradfordGirl · 05/01/2023 16:41

@scaredysquiggle Thanks. But the papers were tipped off.

OP posts:
scaredysquiggle · 05/01/2023 16:43

🤣 yes probably by people who worked at the bookshop

RUNPMTS · 05/01/2023 16:44

BradfordGirl · 05/01/2023 16:35

The Spanish release date is the same as other countries. So any copies available should not have been released yet.

As a pp has pointed out, the books will just have been put on the shelves too early by accident. They will have had the books in stock for a while now. No conspiracy 🙄

Pansypotter123 · 05/01/2023 16:45

@Sweetpeasaremadeforbees
So you think that the RF are releasing snippets from 'Spare'?!

Okaaay (backs away slowly).

Hahahahahahahahahaha! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

ReunitedThorns · 05/01/2023 16:48

Book to be released in 5 days is launched early, and now it's part of a master plan to cover up Diana's death!

Surely the original release date is part of this conspiracy?

Perhaps China is behind the leak?

Or perhaps it is all nonsense?

milveycrohn · 05/01/2023 16:50

The point is that people find it very hard to believe that a young beautiful woman, like Diana, could be killed in an accident, so invent conspiracy theories to explain it.
The French have no special love for the British, and I am quite sure if there was anything to find, they would have found it.
The driver was off duty and recalled unexpectedly, because Dodi wanted to create a decoy at the front with normal driver, so Henri Paul, Diana, Dodi and the bodyguard could 'escape' out the back.
So Henri Paul had been drinking. He drove too fast, and drove into one of the central pillars. The only person wearing a seatbelt survived.
If Diana had not dispensed with Royal security (which she had, possibly because Bashir had convinced her, they were spying on her), then she may have been convinced to act differently.
Secondly, Harry blames the British media, but it was the French and Italian paparrazzi that were following her.
The lesson to learn from this is that Life is rather tenuous. Sometimes we make a mistake, but there's no going back from death.

ShirleywasaLady · 05/01/2023 16:57

To be fair, I think whoever is releasing the info from 'Spare' is doing a pretty good job of using mumsnet as their main channel. I wouldn't have had the faintest idea about any of it if it wasn't every other post on 'trending'.

BradfordGirl · 05/01/2023 16:59

"The official thesis, rubber-stamped by French and Scotland Yard investigations and later at a public British inquest, is that the crash was the result of 'gross negligence' by the Ritz's intoxicated chauffeur, Henri Paul, who was speeding to escape moped-riding paparazzi tailgating the Mercedes, trying to photograph the Princess and her Egyptian lover."

"Tellingly, the ex-bodyguard outlined his own suspicions that something strange happened in the tunnel. He said: 'A witness driving a car that was travelling in front of the Mercedes in Paris told Diana's inquest he saw a high-powered motorbike overtake the car just seconds before the crash.
'Another witness travelling in the opposite direction saw a second motorbike swerve to avoid smoke and Mercedes wreckage, then carry on out of the tunnel without stopping. The bikes' riders were never found, and that is no coincidence.'
Since Diana's death, I have investigated the crash and its aftermath in forensic detail. I have spoken to French and British intelligence officers, members of the SAS and friends of both the late Princess and Dodi Fayed.
One of my most haunting experiences was interviewing the parents of Henri Paul, the Ritz's 41-year-old chauffeur, who was, within hours of Diana's death, being described in French security-service briefings to Paris newspapers as having been 'drunk as a pig' that night.
The couple, who live in Brittany, told me, with tears in their eyes, that their son was not a heavy drinker: they said he enjoyed only an occasional bottle of beer or a Ricard, a liquorice-flavoured aperitif.
They added that, during a meeting at the British Embassy in Paris with Scotland Yard in 2006, they were assured their son was not drunk.
Forensic reports presented to the inquest later showed that Henri Paul had three times the French limit of alcohol in his blood samples. But, curiously, the same samples also showed a high level of carbon monoxide, the deadly gas found in car exhaust fumes.
Could the samples, as some conspiracy theorists suggest, have been swapped with those of a suicide victim? The judge at the inquest said this anomaly was impossible to unravel.
Professor Atholl Johnston, a British clinical pharmacologist, said at the inquest in open hearings that no explanation for the carbon monoxide concentrations had been found. 'It was not a 'measuring glitch',' said Johnston. 'The most likely possibility is that it isn't Henri Paul's blood.'"

"Like Diana's former bodyguard Lee Sansum, I have also discovered that powerful black motorbikes which did not belong to any photographers were close to Diana's car when it crumpled against the 13th pillar of the tunnel.
Compelling testimony, seen by the Mail, can be found in background interviews prepared for the Princess's inquest.
Some of this evidence was revealed at the inquest, some of it was never produced.
But the hundreds of pages show that 14 independent witnesses near the scene remember the doomed Mercedes suddenly being surrounded at the tunnel's entrance by the black motorbikes as well as two cars: a dark saloon and a white turbo Fiat Uno. These all sped on into the darkness of the tunnel after the Mercedes. According to one witness who produced evidence for the inquest, these mysterious vehicles had travelled to the entrance of the tunnel via a nearby slip road and had been nowhere near the Ritz that night.
Piecing together all this information, I found that the saloon had tailgated the Mercedes. Could this have made the chauffeur, perhaps wrongly thinking a paparazzo had caught up with him, drive even faster into the tunnel?
Meanwhile, the Fiat Uno accelerated towards Diana's vehicle, clipping the metalwork and pushing it to one side.
The manoeuvre allegedly allowed one of the black motorbikes, with two riders on board wearing helmets that hid their faces, to speed past Diana's car.
Witnesses at the inquest claim that when one 'rogue' bike was about 15 feet in front of the Mercedes, a fierce flash of white light shone from it — straight into the eyes of the Mercedes driver Henri Paul. The suggestion is that this came from a laser beam carried by a pillion passenger and was directed with precision into Diana's car.
The flash would have temporarily blinded any driver. It would have been followed by a loud bang as the limousine swerved violently before slamming into the pillar.
One of the eyewitnesses, a French harbour pilot driving ahead of the Mercedes — which notably had no back-up car, in contrast to every other journey Diana and Dodi had taken that weekend — claimed to have watched the awful scene in his rear-view mirror.
Chillingly, he recalled the black motorbike stopping after the crash and one of the riders jumping off before going to peer in the window of the Mercedes. The rider, who kept his helmet on, then reportedly turned to his companion, giving a gesture (where both arms are crossed over the body and then thrown out straight to each side) that is used informally in the military to indicate 'mission accomplished'."

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11596307/SUE-REID-DID-researchers-Harrys-new-memoir-quiz-Dianas-death-crash.html

OP posts:
BradfordGirl · 05/01/2023 17:01

So lots of evidence that this is much more than a conspiracy theory.

OP posts:
marcopront · 05/01/2023 17:09

I couldn't see any mention of Diana not wearing a seat belt in the article. That is a crucial factor in her death, why wouldn't you mention it?

I don't think my Dad has any idea of my alcohol drinking habits and I am sure I am not alone in that. Why is the only evidence the driver wasn't drunk, that his parents say he didn't drink much.