Are the Royal Family releasing info from SPARE to cover up Diana accusations?

[BradfordGirl]

This is an extraordinary article that presents new information outlining why Princess Diana's death was not the accident it first appeared. Ordinarily this would be front page news and everyone would be talking about it. Instead people are talking about if Meghan used the term baby brain to Kate, or if William and Harry did not want Charles and Camilla to marry.

These latter allegations are just meaningless distractions. The kind of thing that happens in every family. But the allegation that a car accident for Diana was planned is a serious allegation. And the only people who benefit from burying this story are the Royal Family.

So I think the Royal Family have arranged for an advance copy of SPARE to be leaked so extracts can be leaked every hour, thus burying the story about Diana's death.

I think the allegations around Diana's death are probably true.

"Extraordinarily, since the Princess's death, I have been told by a well-placed source in our foreign intelligence service, MI6, that this is not far from the truth of what really happened.
The astonishing claim is that a 'Paris operation' was organised to frighten the Princess into halting her romance because her lover was considered by the British Establishment to be an unsuitable companion for the mother of a future King.
'We planned to break her arm or cause a minor injury,' said my MI6 informant, now retired and living in Europe. 'No one in the security services overseeing this operation wanted Diana to be killed. Dodi? Well, he was another matter.'""

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11596307/SUE-REID-DID-researchers-Harrys-new-memoir-quiz-Dianas-death-crash.html

So Harry's book turns out to be an absolute shit show and suddenly it's all about 'them'?

Harry wrote that book. Well, J.R. Moehringer did, but officially it's 'his' book. Its contents are his responsibility alone.

I get that it's hard to be a Harkles fan girl today, but no need to lose the plot completely.

Only if you are very gullible and ready to believe utter bull shit.

@marcopront The allegation was there was no plan to kill Diana, they assumed she would be wearing her seatbelt.

The blood sample that supposedly showed the driver was drunk also had very high levels of carbon monoxide in the sample.

Professor Atholl Johnston, a British clinical pharmacologist, said at the inquest in open hearings that no explanation for the carbon monoxide concentrations had been found. 'It was not a 'measuring glitch',' said Johnston. 'The most likely possibility is that it isn't Henri Paul's blood.'"

@BradfordGirl

You have missed my point.
An article discussing the cause of Diana's death does not mention her not wearing a seatbelt.
It doesn't claim to be an article about an attempt to harm her, it claims to be an article about how she died. It neglects to mention a crucial detail.

@marcopront What point am I missing?

You said they didn't need to mention the seatbelt because they didn't plan to kill her just harm her.
The article is about how she died the most important factor in that was the lack of seatbelt. It doesn't even deserve a passing mention in the article.

If the scenario described in the article was true and Diana had survived, then she would have been able to say what happened.
Did they really want that?

This article is the biggest load of drivel!! Absolute speculative rubbish

But if Diana had lived what could she have said? There were motorbikes chasing and cars and a light shone into the car. She would have been disbelieved and told she was confused after the crash.

It presented hearsay and rumour. No new evidence at all.

The blood samples have never been explained.

I think the major point that you’re missing is that it has not provided any actual new evidence.

Only one person survived the crash and he wore a seat belt. Nobody stopped the others from wearing a seat belt.

The allegation is that they thought she would wear her seatbelt and survive. They did not aim to kill her.

The blood sample that supposedly proves the driver was drunk does not seem to be a sample of his blood.

Failure to wear a seatbelt resulted in her death. Unless there was some kind of MI6 hypnotism going on, her own decisions made the horrible accident unsurvivable.

No. Someone may be disputing it. That does not mean that it may not be a sample. I have to wonder if you’re posting all this for a laugh and a reaction.

😆😆😆

@Yesthatismychildsigh So why would there be such high levels of carbon monoxide in the blood sample? This was noted at the inquest.

Been on the gin love?

I’m not a medical scientist but a reason given at the time by a couple of medical people (I was adult by then and off work for two weeks starting the Friday before, so not much other news) was that the deployment of the airbag could have forced some into the lungs. I don’t know if that’s true or not so I’m not stupid or deluded enough to claim that theory as fact.

😂 On something, definitely. Probably on the wind up.

I don't think so as this article came out a few days ago, I read it. I think people saying it could never happen are quite silly, of course you could tamper with seatbelts so they didn't work, this was 30 odd years ago without self-retracting belts. Or it was her choice and the 'scare' went wrong.

I don't think that Diana was killed by anyone, but I don't see how you could rule it out, the evidence is not clear cut and some aspects of it have either been discounted or missing or the witnesses such as Trevor Rees-Jones can't remember anything whatsoever (apparently). It's not inconceivable like some on here are making out.

If I owned a newspaper and I had a story with credibility that the RF had murdered Diana I wouldn’t be prioritising a pair of middle aged duchesses having a petty spat about baby brain or whatever the “accusation” is.

If the RF wanted to frighten Diana into breaking up with Dodi they could have done something more effective (driving dangerously in a fast car feels like driving dangerously in a fast car - it doesn’t feel like an organised threat from someone in a different country). They could have used a more discreet physical threat (glock to the head) or a psychological threat (release dirt to the press - there will be a lot).
They could have split the couple up be threatening or paying dodi or by killing dodi without Diana there. They could have discredited Dodi to make Diana look like a weirdo for going out with him and split them up that way.
A car accident on a busy public road with a multitude of uncontrollable factors is a phenomenally stupid was of trying to injure, but not kill someone. It’s a stupid way to kill someone unless you are the driver. Even if you are the driver it’s stupid, but at least the driver has a modicum of control.

If the vehicle's exhaust system was damaged then it could have released carbon monoxide that would have shown up in his blood even at a high level. Also I don't understand that it doesn't seem to be his blood. It's easy to prove whether it's someone's blood or not, blood is full of DNA.

What was the point of scaring her? Were they going to admit to causing the accident if she hadn’t died?

FFS, as if we weren't all bored to death by this stuff at the time.

If this book is going to resurrect all this again, I'm going to lose my mind.