He has gone after Camilla....

[thebellagio]

The Sun have got hold of a copy of the book that was accidently put on sale in Spain. They are clearly skimming it as fast as possible with a translator. They are reporting that W&H begged KC not to marry C, and that he thought she was leaking stories to the press.

Bloody hell.

So would many of us!

Maybe there was and maybe there wasn't......he's stopped us finding out for sure.

Strange he took out an injunction though when there are plenty of other things he and many other members of the RF could take injunctions out for.

Serving in the military does not necessarily mean the person is a decent human being.

there are all manner of unsavoury people who have done military service.

I'm surprised at the number of people thinking it's comical that H was scared by W's behaviour. I've been on the receiving end of very similar behaviour (shouting, shoving & hitting) in adulthood from an older toxic sibling and honestly it was a shocking & traumatic experience. The idea that I could be made fun of for sharing that is really disturbing, tbh. Also, is it not in the public interest to know that someone who will at some point be King could behave with a vile temper? After all, it seems to have been considered to be in the public interest for the press to go after M & expose her allegedly vile temper?

Going after C: well I can see why both H&W would (allegedly) ask KC not to marry her. Some adults can struggle when their surviving parent wishes to remarry and that's true with a partner with whom they hadn't had an affair with. Your father declaring his intention to marry the woman with whom they had openly had an affair with for the duration of their marriage to your mother - I think many people would struggle with that. And yes, it seems they have moved past it if the smiling and chats in public settings are anything to go by but if we believe the "never complain never explain" approach of the RF then of course they're not going to be rude and surly towards her in public!

That said, I do think H was wrong to write the book for many reasons, not least of which is the contradiction of hoping to reconcile with C & W in the future. I don't see how that could possibly happen now. Overall he seems a damaged soul.

This is the problem of reading these excerpts out of context, not only of the book itself, but also the real context in which all this happened.

William was introduced to Camilla in July 1998. He was 16. Harry was still 13. Their mother had died just the year before, in August 1997. Yes, their parents were divorced, but meeting the Other Woman as both of them saw her, within a year of their mother's death would have been deeply upsetting for teenage boys.
www.theguardian.com/theguardian/1998/jul/10/fromthearchive

Something horrible then happened: the meeting was leaked to the Sun. It was leaked by Camilla's private secretary. He was then fired, but it's clear that the leak benefitted Camilla.This was all reported at the time.

www.thefreelibrary.com/CAMILLA+FIRES+HER+TOP+AIDE%3B+Fury+at+leak+over+William+meeting.-a060670605

Yes I agree if there is any truth behind Harry being involved in any way the killing of twenty five people - regardless of the setting/war, there will have to be a full investigation, potentially a legal one that could end up with him serving life in prison.

Goodness @Swissmountains. What on earth do you think soldiers do in war zones? What do you think the War on Terror meant? It meant the killing of insurgents in Afghanistan. Of course there won't be an investigation. Why would there be? Unless you are saying Harry and other UK solders committed war crimes when they followed lawful orders given to them by senior officials, which can only be determined by the International Criminal Court in The Hague, not by random posters on Mumsnet.

Just seen a headline "She treated me like a young stallion".

Will not be reading!

What a load of old hooey!
”Amazing couple “

Hardly!
There were issues from the get-go, the bizarre wedding with just one family member on the Wife’s side?
It was all very bizarre.
Meghan was not cut out for the life of a “
Royal”
Liked the money and fame, but not having to defer to others.

It’s pretty clear about the protocol the RF has.

Will nobody think of the dog?

newsthump.com/2023/01/05/it-was-my-favourite-bowl-prince-harrys-dog-reveals-all-in-exclusive-netflix-interview/

😂😂😂😂😂

Whaat?
” She treated me like a young stallion?”
It’s obvious he was **struck, but this is comically cringeworthy.

Oh, I did. I said the dog needed a lot of doggy therapy. I wonder if the kids are made to attend therapy yet? A whole household in therapy including the pooches. Only in Cali.

It's like the Burn Book from Mean Girls, photocopied and strewn all over the school premises by the principal villain of the piece.

Yes, I laughed when he said he was treated as a "YOUNG STALLION" by the woman whom he lost his virginity to!

A mixture of Barbara Cartland and Jilly Cooper.

What an embarrassing clown.

BREAKING NEWS

Mumsnetter definitely knows all the facts and absolutely isn’t making up stories because she’s bored!

This is a breaking story, more to follow.

He is obviously really hurt that the RF have been using him as a scapegoat for them. And the British public lapped it up headline after headline and villainised M&H. What was written about them was vile and the public couldn't bay loud enough for more of it every day.
Bit late to say its very sad its being played out in public. The royalists absolutely lapped it up. He is doing to them what they did to him.
There are no winners here

Yes. That's my take on it too.

🙈🤮

Could M take out a conservatorship of poor Harrold like Britney had?

I agree with you. Its refreshing to read a post like this on this thread. Thank you.

That would be an interesting reply to hear.

@lemmein why because they are human as well
Some very spiteful people in this world

Yes lemmein my thoughts exactly.

Agree. Sobering stuff and by far the most foolhardy thing he’s said. Odd for someone who claims his raison d’être is protecting his family from all comers. How can he not realise?

'And today, the latest hypocrisy is the amount of mental-gymnastics people are doing to defend PW attacking his brother'

'Attacking his brother', were you there? We only have Harold's side of the story and as we know he often gets a bit muddled and varies his recollections. If his brother grabbed him in exasperation and he slipped and feel in the dog bowl then so what. 2 grown men having a scuffle.

No, not at all and I’m sorry if it read that way.

i meant Harry was nasty and spiteful to relate it.

Was it George IV who regaled visitors with tales of his derring-do on the field of Waterloo? That this was a complete fabrication and he'd never been near there bothered him not. When you're Royal, it seems, you cannot be wrong. No wonder Harry wants security. Thousands of Afghans have now had their suspicions about Brits further confirmed and are probably even more thoroughly and justifiably annoyed.