Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

More Of Meghan’s Archwell podcasts…

1000 replies

susan12345678 · 31/08/2022 20:51

Just to continue the discussion

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
LateSummerLobelia · 01/09/2022 08:59

Farmageddon · 31/08/2022 22:25

I do think the American press are getting tired of them both TBH. The problem is, all they have to 'sell' is their royal connection, which they now shit all over every chance they get.
The problem is, anytime someone questions or criticises, it just feeds into their victim mentality. They feel hard done by and that they are being targeted.

I'm sure it was difficult for her to acclimatise, and the Royal family are totally weird, so there probably were pressures etc. But the fact that they still want all the perks and titles, without doing any of the work is what gets people annoyed. They didn't earn any of it, but feel entitled to it anyway.

If they had properly walked away, and lived a quiet life with their kids, people would have respected that. But they haven't, they continually dine off their royal victim sob stories as it's the only USP they have as a brand.
Megan in particular can't seem to understand that people were only interested in her because she married into the royal family. Without that, she's irrelevant.

That is exactly how I feel.

Legrandsophie · 01/09/2022 09:05

The problem with that @SilverLiningPlaybook is that The Cut interview makes clear that her issue is mainly with image and branding control. She seems mostly upset that she had little control over who got her pictures or press releases first.

So the issue really seems to be that she didn’t want to take direction from royal advisors and wanted her own control of social media, her own PR and her own direction.

I’m not saying that is wrong. People should have agency over their own lives. But there are always limitations. The choice was join the family and take on the role or don’t. It is the same game all celebs play. I don’t think she noticed that most very high profile celebrities take the RF route- low key coverage through official sources.

She was taking in a clearly defined public role and seemed to want the exposure but not the limitations.

LondonWolf · 01/09/2022 09:06

BadgerB · 01/09/2022 08:40

But they (at, least, Meghan) wanted to "hit the ground running". She wouldn't have taken kindly to being told to stay in the background for a year or so.

All the drama would have kicked off even sooner...if she'd have married him at all.

Wheresthebeach · 01/09/2022 09:06

You can’t teach someone who doesn’t want to learn.
Diana was 19, MM was in a totally different life stage and a very different person. I can’t think MM would have welcomed being protected from the public or the press- she’s an actress - attention is what she craves. And she would have felt even more silenced and sidelined. Can you imagine how she’s be spinning it now if they’d tried to hold her back?

Roussette · 01/09/2022 09:08

Readinginthesun · 01/09/2022 08:51

Obviously I am not being clear . MM said she was pulled aside - I am simply asking if anyone has evidence of this strange thing . She has previous for being economical with the truth which is why so many people are sceptical.
The second part was really a general question as I think that is so serious . It wasn’t aimed just at you .
In my defence I am unwell at the moment so maybe not as articulate!

I hope you feel better soon. 😊

Pulled aside is just a turn of phrase is how I'd take it. Leaning in to listen to a conversation, which she was doing

AuroraCake · 01/09/2022 09:15

Wheresthebeach · 01/09/2022 09:06

You can’t teach someone who doesn’t want to learn.
Diana was 19, MM was in a totally different life stage and a very different person. I can’t think MM would have welcomed being protected from the public or the press- she’s an actress - attention is what she craves. And she would have felt even more silenced and sidelined. Can you imagine how she’s be spinning it now if they’d tried to hold her back?

I do have to object a bit. Some actors crave attention. Some particularly in the UK really don’t. Never seek it and apart from their work would never ever give interviews, go places they will be photographed. I think they get a bad rap for being attention seeking…things. Many want to live their lives quietly. Of course those are mainly the good ones who do it because they are actually extremely talented at protesting other people.

AuroraCake · 01/09/2022 09:15

AuroraCake · 01/09/2022 09:15

I do have to object a bit. Some actors crave attention. Some particularly in the UK really don’t. Never seek it and apart from their work would never ever give interviews, go places they will be photographed. I think they get a bad rap for being attention seeking…things. Many want to live their lives quietly. Of course those are mainly the good ones who do it because they are actually extremely talented at protesting other people.

Inhabiting other people.

AuroraCake · 01/09/2022 09:17

Roussette · 01/09/2022 09:08

I hope you feel better soon. 😊

Pulled aside is just a turn of phrase is how I'd take it. Leaning in to listen to a conversation, which she was doing

Ask him then.

Butterdishtea · 01/09/2022 09:18

I completely understand why it might take a decade to process and move on from her lived experience in Britain..I remember her being relentlessly teased, criticised and ridiculed in the press. She was. Very few people on earth would know how that feels. I certainly don't but I've had reputation pulled apart in a much smaller scale and healing took years. She needs another few to move on.

That being said I increasingly have to agree there is something else wrong with Meghan. The experiences in Britain couldn't have happened to a more complex personality. I don't know how much of this was lying dormant and was perhaps triggered by the press. I do think there are genuinely lovely sides to her personality and her altruism is often in good faith. But something else is going on too. My private guess is narcissist traits.

Ohnonevermind · 01/09/2022 09:20

I’ve seen the composer has posted complimentary things about Harry in the past so I’m sure he’ll be happy to confirm that he made these statements to Meghan.

There is a reason why we treat these grandiose statements with either scepticism or derision. It’s because she lies/bends the truth to such an extent it’s unrecognisable

AlexandriasWindmill · 01/09/2022 09:20

I'm starting to think MM is quite naive - about the media; about PR; about branding. I can see how she thought she had experience because she managed her own PR as an actress but she underestimated how much strategies need to change when you have a global stage.
I think she may be difficult to 'manage' from a PR pov but her team will be on high salaries. If they're not capable of building a better brand then they shouldn't have accepted the roles.
I can see how MM thinks she's really trying - giving to the homeless; giving women a platform. But the truth is that PRs would be managing and releasing those stories. They'd have put a professional chair on the podcasts. The thing about good PR is you don't see the hard work. The problem is that means celebs and the public often underestimate how much effort and planning it takes.

Ohnonevermind · 01/09/2022 09:23

@AlexandriasWindmill

sunshine Sachs handled her PR before she was married.

Livelovebehappy · 01/09/2022 09:24

She’s a compulsive liar. Fed the line when she disappeared to America that her and Harry wanted privacy to live her life under the radar with her Prince and child, but once there proceeds to do multiple interviews and ‘leaks’ about life with the RF. Always drags the RF into every interview, because that keeps her in the lime light which is when she’s happiest. If she did as she said at the outset, we wouldn't be forever reading about her because no-one would care.

LittleBearPad · 01/09/2022 09:25

Ohnonevermind · 01/09/2022 09:23

@AlexandriasWindmill

sunshine Sachs handled her PR before she was married.

But PR for a cable show actress is very different from PR for a philanthropist with a royal title.

Legrandsophie · 01/09/2022 09:27

That is a really good summary @AlexandriasWindmill

They both come across as naive. Royal PR had been at this for a lot longer than they have. The strategies and organisation for royal press releases and visits are a huge undertaking. It is quite arrogant to think you can just breeze in and do it your own way. Especially since every action in that family has an effect on all other family members. Of course it has to be a joint effort.

LittleBearPad · 01/09/2022 09:27

I completely understand why it might take a decade to process and move on from her lived experience in Britain..I remember her being relentlessly teased, criticised and ridiculed in the press. She was. Very few people on earth would know how that feels.

Fergie would, Kate would, so would Sophie. All of whom have been the subjects of the newspapers’ ire.

derxa · 01/09/2022 09:32

Ohnonevermind · 01/09/2022 09:20

I’ve seen the composer has posted complimentary things about Harry in the past so I’m sure he’ll be happy to confirm that he made these statements to Meghan.

There is a reason why we treat these grandiose statements with either scepticism or derision. It’s because she lies/bends the truth to such an extent it’s unrecognisable

The supporters never address the grandiosity. The composer may well have made these remarks. He may have been aiming to flatter and please Meghan and Harry. People say all sorts of daft things all the time. But you just keep them between you and your partner. You don't broadcast them to the world because you just look utterly foolish.

Festoonlights · 01/09/2022 09:32

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Samcro · 01/09/2022 09:42

LittleBearPad · 01/09/2022 09:27

I completely understand why it might take a decade to process and move on from her lived experience in Britain..I remember her being relentlessly teased, criticised and ridiculed in the press. She was. Very few people on earth would know how that feels.

Fergie would, Kate would, so would Sophie. All of whom have been the subjects of the newspapers’ ire.

i doubt they would. they never had the amount of hate directed at them that M has had.
people seem to think that because other royal women have had bad press, that M should just suck it up.
back when those women joined the rf SM was not really a thing (or as widespread) as it is now. just look on here and you can see how bad it is.
why should she just suck it up and keep quiet.

AlexandriasWindmill · 01/09/2022 09:42

Ohnonevermind · 01/09/2022 09:23

@AlexandriasWindmill

sunshine Sachs handled her PR before she was married.

Yes but MM still contacted people directly from her personal email address. I can see how she thought she knew how to do 'this'. In fact she said as much early on. That she wouldn't be phased by the media or frightened of it because she had experience of being in the public eye.
But she didn't ... not really.
And she had no experience of the UK media but assumed it would be the same as the US. It isn't. Sunshine Sachs make that mistake all the time too. Stories that fly in the US, don't in the UK; and vice versa. Heck in the UK, stories that fly in England don't fly in Scotland, Wales or Ireland. It's a difficult balance. You need a media team that know and appreciate all those nuances or are adept enough at stories that are so bland they land perfectly everywhere. And you need a manager who will say 'no' to you, even if it has to look as though they're saying 'yes' to pander to egos.

AuroraCake · 01/09/2022 09:43

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Trump? I don’t know what Meghan is or isn’t. I do know this interview rightly did her offer. People can say what they like about a podcast but to essentially have one of your own: POC and liberal successful woman, write a very derisive article about you that paints you as shallow, self obsessed, controlling, a bit of a kook and vapid…well that isn’t a good look.

theworldhas · 01/09/2022 09:44

This reply has been deleted

Post references deleted post

ajandjjmum · 01/09/2022 09:46

AuroraCake · 01/09/2022 08:45

Also on the Princes Trust it seems the Earl of Snowdon has been for a long time earmarked to take this over. He already goes to many of their events. And given his own career it seems logical.

what happens after that who knows.

I thought it was really good that David Linley was given the responsibility of the Prince's Trust - and from what I can see, he has just gone about it in a quiet, understated way, supporting those people it is there to help. A little unreasonable to suggest handing it over to Harry, because he's got nothing else to do!

theworldhas · 01/09/2022 09:46

@AuroraCake

one of your own: POC and liberal successful woman

Yeah because oPOC ought to think the same and support/oppose the same people. Jesus.

AuroraCake · 01/09/2022 09:47

AlexandriasWindmill · 01/09/2022 09:42

Yes but MM still contacted people directly from her personal email address. I can see how she thought she knew how to do 'this'. In fact she said as much early on. That she wouldn't be phased by the media or frightened of it because she had experience of being in the public eye.
But she didn't ... not really.
And she had no experience of the UK media but assumed it would be the same as the US. It isn't. Sunshine Sachs make that mistake all the time too. Stories that fly in the US, don't in the UK; and vice versa. Heck in the UK, stories that fly in England don't fly in Scotland, Wales or Ireland. It's a difficult balance. You need a media team that know and appreciate all those nuances or are adept enough at stories that are so bland they land perfectly everywhere. And you need a manager who will say 'no' to you, even if it has to look as though they're saying 'yes' to pander to egos.

The UK really can’t abide the aspirational, perfect, instagram life when issued by their own. Kardashian’s are fine but if it’s a British person they ain’t long for the pile awaiting a kicking. Sad Meghan thinks she has to be like this to be a worthwhile person.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.