Interesting analysis on social media about Meghan

[Why2why]

Interesting analysis but who could be paying for this concerted effort? It’s suggested that not only is it coordinated but the people doing it are paid to do so.

www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.buzzfeednews.com/amphtml/ellievhall/bot-sentinel-meghan-markle-prince-harry-twitter

So on a thread discussing horrific trolling and abuse Meghan faces you think it’s okay to pile on her about a coffee donation?

You couldn't make it up!
I never cease to be amazed.

They are not the slightest 'brazen hypocrites'...
What are they 'flinging at the rf' now? I've not seen anything at all.

Meanwhile, a bit of whataboutism is needed....'do as I say not as I do' yeah Charles and his 16,000 miles in 11 days just recently on private jets/helicopters whilst up at COP26. That's hypocrisy by the bucketload.

That is a classic do as I say not as I do !!

But naughty old Meghan Markle gave $25 vouchers to people fighting for parental rights.
Awful woman! How dare she!

Rubic
Getting to the RF page is such a faff for me ,
I honestly dont understand how some on here manage to post on The first page within minutes of every RF thread this quick

The Hilarious thing is zulu if anyone other than M&H did this everyone would be saying that it’s cheap coming from millionaires .
But it just proves that you are only allowed to say two things about them, poor them , or good for them, anything else and you are branded racist.
Or throw in William or Charles or whatever, I don’t get it ?!

@Roussette

So on a thread discussing horrific trolling and abuse Meghan faces you think it’s okay to pile on her about a coffee donation?

You couldn't make it up!
I never cease to be amazed.

They are not the slightest 'brazen hypocrites'...
What are they 'flinging at the rf' now? I've not seen anything at all.

Meanwhile, a bit of whataboutism is needed....'do as I say not as I do' yeah Charles and his 16,000 miles in 11 days just recently on private jets/helicopters whilst up at COP26. That's hypocrisy by the bucketload.

That is a classic do as I say not as I do !!

But naughty old Meghan Markle gave $25 vouchers to people fighting for parental rights.
Awful woman! How dare she!

I thought he was virtually in attendance, not jetting around?

I'm not offended by your comments zulu, just as I say they are inappropriate, desperate and tedious. No one is treating them like runaway anything just an over privileged pair who wanted it to be the 'Sussex Royal show' with them calling the shots and they weren't allowed, so flounced.

Meanwhile, a bit of whataboutism is needed....'do as I say not as I do' yeah Charles and his 16,000 miles in 11 days just recently on private jets/helicopters whilst up at COP26. That's hypocrisy by the bucketload

Perhaps he should start trekking to and from any duties from now on,
Or perhaps he should just stay in all these grand houses of his eat cheese and drink wine, but then you will brand him a lazy greedy waste of space .
This is a stupid comparison when even the most devoted environmental activist take planes,
Just like Harry did in 2019 for the google summit .
Am I allowed to say this ? Or is it hypocritical and racist of me

@Viviennemary

Whole article in the DM about them donating £18 for Starbucks vouchers from Archewell. Its for coffee for the campaigners for the paid leavd campaign. Which Biden has dropped. Bit mad IMHO.

@queenofarles I think This was the first post in the thread referring to the subject. *@Viviennemary points out that there was a whole article in the DM - so from one tweet the DM managed to stretch to an article. Which was picked up by @Viviennemary*. If you feel that strongly against H&M Maybe it's time to place some of that blame on your lovely media and newspapers such as the DM that write it. Or best still don't engage with it.

@queenofarles

Meanwhile, a bit of whataboutism is needed....'do as I say not as I do' yeah Charles and his 16,000 miles in 11 days just recently on private jets/helicopters whilst up at COP26. That's hypocrisy by the bucketload

Perhaps he should start trekking to and from any duties from now on,
Or perhaps he should just stay in all these grand houses of his eat cheese and drink wine, but then you will brand him a lazy greedy waste of space .
This is a stupid comparison when even the most devoted environmental activist take planes,
Just like Harry did in 2019 for the google summit .
Am I allowed to say this ? Or is it hypocritical and racist of me

queenofarles - Yanbu.

The 16,000 miles in 11 days was in Jan 20, and the majority of the miles were due to Prince Charles being required to visit a new Head of State.

queenoffaries

It's really tiresome when you say everyone on these threads, and that must include me, calls you a racist.
Show me one time where I have done that. To save you legwork, you won't find it.

I just find it odd when some posters jump to that conclusion. FWIW there are racists out there, there are racists on MN but to say that MM has suffered racism is not accusing you personally.

My comments on PC and hypocrisy still stand for me. Not sure where racism comes into that

The 16,000 miles in 11 days was in Jan 20, and the majority of the miles were due to Prince Charles being required to visit a new Head of State

Incorrect. How can the majority of 16,000 miles be attributed to visiting a new Head of State? He didn't fly to Australia!

@JaniieJones

I'm not offended by your comments zulu, just as I say they are inappropriate, desperate and tedious. No one is treating them like runaway anything just an over privileged pair who wanted it to be the 'Sussex Royal show' with them calling the shots and they weren't allowed, so flounced.

@JaniieJones even with all evidence- you refuse to accept that she was constantly racially abused by the British Media and others. But would rather minimise her experience to "she flounced off ". Instead you can only see that she upset your poor RF. They have left 2 YEARS AGO NOW so why are the BP so interested in them and why do those who have similar views to you still engage with it. 💰💰

Rousette you don’t need to say the actual word, saying she is getting criticism because of her skin colour is enough to point out that any criticism from me is based on her skin colour which is not true.

'But would rather minimise her experience to "she flounced off ". Instead you can only see that she upset your poor RF. '

I said 'they'. They flounced when they were told no to their US Sussex Royal grand plan. They wanted all the privilege without the boring duty.

BTW they aren't 'my' rf. Get rid of them all if you ask me. But, one cannot whine about invading privacy and getting unfair scrutiny yet then subject others to the very same. Unless you're a hypocrite.

Incorrect. How can the majority of 16,000 miles be attributed to visiting a new Head of State? He didn't fly to Australia!

He went to Oman , to convey his condolences on the passing of the Sultan .

'They have left 2 YEARS AGO NOW so why are the BP so interested in them '

Because they use their rf links and status to promote themselves? Because they show no kindness and compassion yet constantly harp on about it? They play the victim card and most can see straight through it.

@JaniieJones you sound more like the DM and other rags with every post.

When did they ask for privacy. Not once did they say they want privacy, it's what the rags said.

Who on earth is happy with unfair scrutiny. It is unfair when others are praised for what you are damned for.

As for the grand plan? Well, I don't recall even the rags claiming someone heard them make this plan. So you are just plain making this up.

And you keep repeating these over and over and over ................

They rightly complained about constant unfair scrutiny and invasion of privacy yet unleashed just that with their unsubstantiated allegations including untruths, one of the many being 'they cut me off financially!'. No they didn't. Harry was given a transitional wodge.

'As for the grand plan? Well, I don't recall even the rags claiming someone heard them make this plan. So you are just plain making this up.'

Ah, no must've missed the launch of Sussex Royal? Y'know that cheesy glossy LA style site that listed their grand plan.

@JaniieJones

'They have left 2 YEARS AGO NOW so why are the BP so interested in them '

Because they use their rf links and status to promote themselves? Because they show no kindness and compassion yet constantly harp on about it? They play the victim card and most can see straight through it.

They are not using the royal link to promote themselves. They are titled just like other Dukes, Duchesses, Earls etc. all over the place. They do not drop them because they do business. And no, before you repeat, they did not rubbish the RF. The RF rubbished them, by their treatment.

Also, are you now going around calling people of colour 'playing the victim card' when they experience racism? Do you constantly tell them to shut up when they complain of such treatment?

Because they show no kindness and compassion yet constantly harp on about it

But when they do show kindness and compassion - quite often you / other posters say it's a game. So this is what we have said previous- whatever they do you you will find fault. Look at this thread for one. A thread about a different topic, someone inserts a DM post relating to a gesture of giving coffee to staff and posters have an issue- then in the same thread they are not kind to anyone. They are high profile couple so anything they do will be in the press but it's up to you not to engage with it

@Viviennemary

Why not just give it anonymously. Because everything they do is to promote themselves. That is why they aren't popular and get criticised.

Exactly. Drop the titles, stop poncing about as if they are Heads of State, stop the promotional videos etc and just be private citizens doing good. But no, they want to be celebrities with all that goes with it.

'But when they do show kindness and compassion - quite often you / other posters say it's a game. So this is what we have said previous- whatever they do you you will find fault. '

Oh but coffee vouchers and cakes are simply lovely!

I mean kindness and compassion to other family members. Like Granny who must be heartbroken by all the allegations petulant Harry has made. They weren't cut off financially for starters. Any other gripes should be been made privately, they would have expected the same courtesy in return. What next, the Cambridges pen a 'they found freedom thank fuck for that' trashy book in return?!

Gosh the myopic view of some people.

The whole point of well known people donating, especially smaller gifts, is to encourage others. It is a concept well proven over the years.

They clearly addressed in the interview that when they try to solve privately, they are ignored.

'Also, are you now going around calling people of colour 'playing the victim card'

Harry played the victim card. Poor misunderstood Harry. I feel sorry for him tbh everyone clearly tiptoed round growing up due to the tragic death of his dm.

He wanted to do it his way, he was not allowed so invented a narrative that they were driven out by the toxic media when they experienced the same negativity as everyone else. Look how Camilla was slated for years, really nasty toxic crap, also Fergie the Duchess of Pork anyone?nevermind Beatrice and Eugenie. Harry was used to being a popular member of the rf and could not cope with the criticism, so flounced and has made a fortune out of his poor me stories ever since.

Like Granny who must be heartbroken by all the allegations petulant Harry has made. They weren't cut off financially for starters. Any other gripes should be
So you didn't have any gripes about M&H before the Oprah interview. All this stems from the interview ???- maybe if she had kept quiet and put up with all the abuse you would have preferred that. Or Because she is wealthy that means she can't be racially abused or it doesn't matter as much ???

Look how Camilla was slated for years, really nasty toxic crap, also Fergie the Duchess of Pork anyone?
So this is your comparison - Meghan being racially abused in-line with two women who had affairs while married. It was also not as relentless as the campaign of abuse against M.