Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Meghan’s birthday video

999 replies

Greenlittle · 05/08/2021 14:31

I like the idea and I like the video. (Not that keen on the big desk) And I though MM looked...alive!

Not sure who the other woman was. But there was good chemistry.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
Greenlittle · 07/08/2021 12:03

I don’t see why they should give up their titles it is a hereditary thing.

I think it is an absurd system to honour people based on the vagina they come from.
But there it is. This is the system we support.

And it comes with good and bad. The bad for Harry is he lost his mum due to paparazzi when he was a young boy and he needs security for his family which costs a lot. The upside is he can earn and support charitable causes if he uses his name recognition judiciously.

OP posts:
Roussette · 07/08/2021 12:06

So if they give those up then there shouldn't be anything to nitpick over, right?

You'd hope so! But if that were to happen, people do need to accept that William will always be his brother, and Charles the future King, his father. That ain't going away!

Marmaladeagain · 07/08/2021 12:09

To continue using titles bestowed upon them by a system they say treated them abhorrently.... then they look plain daft.

The continuing use of those RF titles is the reason they are in the news. Once H&M stop with that particular hypocrisy then they will fade over to the gossip columns that other celebrities inhabit.

AnnunciataZ · 07/08/2021 12:14

@JingsMahBucket

Why should they give up their titles? They’ve literally done nothing wrong.

And you’re naive if you think people still wouldn’t nitpick at them or harass them even if they relinquished their titles.

I was being sarcastic @JingsMahBucket! I meant that it's one thing their detractors harp on about now that they've done all the other things i mentioned. So in an ideal world if they relinquish their titles then there wouldn't be anything to complain about. In theory!!
Greenlittle · 07/08/2021 12:14

If you want them to stop using titles, just abolish the dinosaur that is Monarchy. It is an abomination to equality.

I suppose we republicans are also hypocritical because we don’t give up our citizenship in UK and live in a Republic 🤷‍♀️

And I suppose Royalists are also hypocritical if they supposedly support equality and meritocracy. Because royalty is the antithesis of that

OP posts:
Roussette · 07/08/2021 12:15

Don't agree. Whether Harry had a title or not, or Meghan... people would still know who they are. It's pretty irrelevant. And it sets a dangerous precedent for the likes o Andrew.

They only have to write something saying 'Harry & Meghan' and everyone knows its them. If there titles were removed it would make no difference. And the reason it doesn't happen is setting a precedent.

They are not going anywhere. Does anyone honestly think that if they just called themselves 'Harry & Meghan' the DailyFail would stop the 10 articles a day?
No. They are best clickbait ever. Only trouble is, their sources are gone so they just have to make it up now.

Cacacoisfarraige · 07/08/2021 12:15

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Greenlittle · 07/08/2021 12:17

Building a compassion brand requires talent. These brands don’t build themselves

OP posts:
SnottyLottie · 07/08/2021 12:18

I remember having a conversation about celebrities and charity work with my sister.

I said something along the lines of “oh have you seen that Leonardo DiCaprio donated a large sum of money to such a such disaster?” (I think it was the 2004 Tsunami).

She rolled her eyes cynically and replied “Yeah. He’s only done it for the publicity”

I went on to say that I didn’t think he had, I think he just wanted to genuinely help and he has the means to be generous in his donations.

Sister then went on to say if he was that bothered he could have donated the same amount and stayed anonymous, or at least ask for it not to be publicly announced by the foundation.

Then I said, “well that is true. But then you’d get people saying, ‘why is it always the common people who end up donating to these causes? Where are the millionaires and celebrities, like Leonardo DiCaprio, who have the funds to actually donate to campaigns like this but seemingly don’t”

I also pointed out that celebrity endorsements bring publicity to charities which encourages other people to donate and also informs the public of their existence. A good example of this is that I had never heard of Smart Works before MM had patronised and promoted them. This is a charity that would have been really helpful for me as a woman who was made redundant when I was 22 weeks pregnant and hadn’t the means to afford new interview clothes for when I wanted to go back to work.

It feels like a double edged sword for celebrities, yet some are more maligned than others.

Marmaladeagain · 07/08/2021 12:18

@Greenlittle

Building a compassion brand requires talent. These brands don’t build themselves
No, it requires money. The skills are bought by employing others.
Greenlittle · 07/08/2021 12:18

And I doubt money will run out any time soon. MM could well go into politics next and run for governor. She might get elected too. Oh the teeth gnashing on MN 😂

OP posts:
Greenlittle · 07/08/2021 12:20

Good point Snotty. And sorry you went through such hardship. Hope all has turned out well 💐

OP posts:
AnnunciataZ · 07/08/2021 12:24

@Greenlittle

And I doubt money will run out any time soon. MM could well go into politics next and run for governor. She might get elected too. Oh the teeth gnashing on MN 😂
@Greenlittle Imagine if, by some freak accident, H&M wound up as King and Queen? MN would spontaneously combust!

(And no, I'm not wishing harm to Charles or the Cambridges)

SueSaid · 07/08/2021 12:33

'Imagine if, by some freak accident, H&M wound up as King and Queen? MN would spontaneously combust!'

No, you can't imagine this hypothetical but still possible scenario. It was discussed on a previous thread and nope. Hypothetical discussion is verboten according to some pro Haz posters.

Viviennemary · 07/08/2021 12:38

I think the whole country would combust never mind just MN. Grin

Roussette · 07/08/2021 12:57

I am amused at an article that popped up saying Eugenie is the key to bringing Meghan and Harry back in to the 'royal fold' so they can be on the balcony for the Jubilee next year.

I don't know about the country combusting at the thought of King Harry/Queen Meghan... I think some would combust at them on the balcony next year!

AllTheUsernamesAreAlreadyTaken · 07/08/2021 13:03

@Greenlittle Imagine if, by some freak accident, H&M wound up as King and Queen? MN would spontaneously combust!

(And no, I'm not wishing harm to Charles or the Cambridges)

Imagine if an entire family, including an 8, 6 and 3 year old all died! Teehee

Jesus, this thread

PreparationPreparationPrep · 07/08/2021 13:11

@PearlFriday

No *@rousette*, that's not at all what I mean and not what I said, there's nobody preventing her from helping people, but it's all so publicised. And linked to a big birthday. Whatever.
@PearlFriday This is a brilliant example - MM is doing it her way and not your way . And this seems to be the problem for many of you. "She could just do this, she could just do that, why doesn't she do this, this person did this - that's how it should be done! - I would have more respect for her if she did it my way - which you wouldn't you would just find another problem to criticise and call it debating as you can't accept that she is living her life with her family and thriving! It really is pathetic. She is a very confident, articulate, and successful woman living and learning amongst others of similar calibre- so she is doing it her way along side people she respects and learns from. I am sure she receives feedback from her target audience and will adapt future projects in response. A PP said I would have more respect for the project of it was a Webinar - basically where anyone can join" maybe she will do this at a later stage, maybe she has organised something like this already - who knows but this is what she is doing now and obviously we won't know the outcome for sometime yet but from I can see it is flying already and in less than 48 hours.
Gilmorehill · 07/08/2021 13:13

I don’t want to see them on the balcony next year.

Greenlittle · 07/08/2021 13:15

Building a brand with a feel good factor is amazingly hard. People think if you have money, it is easy. It isn’t. There are so many decisions, so many little things that need to come together. And hiring people requires managing and directing them. That’s why most startups who are funded fail. Not because of lack of money but because they aren’t able to pull the elements together into a coherent brand and product.

Not saying MM and Harry are there. They are feeling their way. Making mistakes.

But I think Meghan made a good video here. It is light hearted, with an initiative that can catch on. And doesn’t require too much set-up.

OP posts:
Roussette · 07/08/2021 13:19

I don’t want to see them on the balcony next year

You saying that proves my point exactly.

As I said upthread... even if they had no titles, some on here need to come to terms with the fact that William is the brother, and Charles the future king is the Dad. And if they go on the balcony at the invitation of the Queen or whoever, you have to suck it up

@PreparationPreparationPrep
Great post, so agree.
We don't own Meghan, she can do her initiatives exactly how she wants to.

If she announced she'd given a million $ to a womens' refuge network, posters would say why isn't it 2 million. If she gave 2, it would be why isn't it 4.
And so on....
This couple can't win, and this goes back to when they got engaged.

Mummy194 · 07/08/2021 13:20

There is a lot of reasons why the rich donate anonymously.

Mostly it's to stop the floodgates from opening, where you get inundated with begging sob stories.

Some will donate, and it will show on their accounts/book keeping, without the publicity - which may help with presenting your taxes a certain way.

For others it could the the counter of that, in that it may not be convenient for future endeavours - ie the money has gone from your account, but may be better that it's not known where exactly it went to. Later when it's scrutiny, it may be better to remain vague than have evidence publicly out there. Quite convenient if you bundle your expenditures.

Plumtree391 · 07/08/2021 13:21

I don't see why Meghan and Harry shouldn't be 'on the balcony' next year or any other year.

Roussette · 07/08/2021 13:24

I don't see why Meghan and Harry shouldn't be 'on the balcony' next year or any other year

As I said in my last post... you prove my point exactly.

I hope they are because the outrage on here will be quite amusing...

Greenlittle · 07/08/2021 13:28

I think MM is showing that the American way of doing royalty and patronage is far more engaging and exciting.

Not only MN but the royal courtiers must be gnashing their teeth. Makes cutting ribbons look mighty dull (and pointless).

OP posts:
Swipe left for the next trending thread