Michelle Obama is very inspirational, her mantra of when they go low we go high would be something a lot of celebs should listen too.
I have always thought the main problem H&M are going to have going forward is how to make enough £££ to fund their lifestyle whilst being philanthropists. They are wealthy of course but they are not billionaires. Nor do they have the intellectual clout of the Obamas or Gates so it is not going to be easy for them in that way.
They are going to have to tread a very difficult path and will be interesting to see how they manage it.
I guess my view on the Frogmore costs are anything above necessary wiring/plumbing etc should be funded by them. So if they wanted F&B paint rather than dulux then they pay the difference.
If the report is true though I am interested in why they don't just pay the £2m or whatever the amount is off in one go rather than in instalments. I suspect it is because it is because like most people their assets aren't that liquid. I have also read, possibly on here so maybe not true that Harry's wealth is very tied up.
Anyway, I suspect it will be Charles who pays for it and by some incredibly convoluted way that means it will fall on the tax payer. And that is not an attack on H&M, I think the whole funding of the RF is very dodgy and smoke and mirrors. I suspect the tax payers fund an awful lot more than we realise.