Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

writing style

451 replies

PineappleDanish · 30/03/2020 18:05

Why do HARRY and MEGHAN write their INSTAGRAM posts with this WEIRD mix of words in block CAPITALS and others in standard script? It's very ODD.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
ClapForCats · 07/04/2020 11:59

Archwell sounds like a secure prison unit

That made me laugh.

ClapForCats · 07/04/2020 12:01

I am utterly bewildered now.

What in the name of all that is holy, are M & H thinking, launching Archewell?

yoloPenguinsEatfish · 07/04/2020 12:33

They have some not very nice replies, courtesy of the DM news item.

Archewell... doesnt exactly ring off the tongue for me.

Might just as well be a hedge fund. (lightbulb moment for HaM!!)

Does it mean Archie + wellness? there's a lot of people already in the wellness 'industry', some of whom even have some credentials.

FizzAfterSix · 07/04/2020 12:38

The irony of insisting that they wanted to protect Archie from public scrutiny and now they are exploiting him as a worldwide ‘charitable’ venture.
#FreeArchie 😀

Yesbutno · 07/04/2020 12:52

Why are they always "compelled" to do everything? But apparently won't release any more details "until the time is right". Hmm

The Duke and Duchess told The Telegraph: 'Like you, our focus is on supporting efforts to tackle the global Covid-19 pandemic but faced with this information coming to light, we felt compelled to share the story of how this came to be.'

HarryDaylight · 07/04/2020 13:23

Self aggrandizement.

CanIHaveAPenguinPlease · 07/04/2020 14:51

They didn’t have to comment though. In times like this it would have been better to stay silent imo.

sunnie1992 · 07/04/2020 14:55

Sorry posted this on the wrong thread!

You know what, I've had a weird change of heart about Meghan over the last few weeks.

When they did their bombshell announcement in January I was (rather irrationally) livid. I felt that they wanted their cake and eat it, and it was ridiculous to think they could be semi royal, free to say what they want politically and yet use the royal status to give them a lifestyle of billionaires.

The more I look at it, the more I think that Meghan just made a big mistake.

She's approaching 40, and as people on here are so keen to point out, might have been running out of time to start a family. She is also at the wrong end of the age spectrum to be breaking into Hollywood.

Meeting Harry when she did must have felt like a stroke of pure golden luck.

He was royal, so would elevate her status to no end, she could carry on with the charitable work she seemed to like, she would have money and a lifestyle that very few people can achieve, even well known actors can't live like that.

They rushed into the marriage. I think anyone who gets married before having been together (and lived together) for at least 5 years, has no real idea what they are getting into.

I understand why, especially if they wanted a family. She was originally committed to becoming a senior royal, even when offered the chance to continue acting.

I think the reality doesn't really live up to the pictures you see in the paper. It's probably boring quite a bit of the time, and I bet there is a lot of background work before you rock up to an event.

From what I hear about all the royals, including Meghan and Harry, is that they seemed well informed when they appeared at charities and supporting their patronages.

That takes work, as they have a LOT of events to go to.

The press were not kind to her once the wedding took place. This is relatively standard for a royal bride, if you look at the coverage of Kate, Fergie and Camilla immediately after their weddings.

But I'll bet it hurts to see it. Meghan didn't have that level of fame before, so she won't have been as prepared for it as they may have thought.

I think the constraints of the royal family protocol was just too much for her - as it would be for me. I would hate to be married to any of them.

Then she gets pregnant. Now she has a problem.

Again, we see it time and time again on here where a woman has gotten married, moved to her husbands country and then had a baby. When the wheels come off, she is in a precarious position with regards to custody and returning to her home country.

Look at Autumn Phillips. I doubt that a court would have allowed her to go back to Canada with her daughters. They are older and therefore settled here, and like it or not, that fact that Peter Phillips is a member of the royal family will bear some weight.

So she is stuck here for the foreseeable, regardless of whether she would like to return to Canada.

I think Meghan panicked. The only way to ensure Archie would remain with her in America, should they split up, was to get there ASAP. Before Archie was olde enough to go to school and be considered settled in the UK.

I suspect that is why Archie did not come back to the UK in January or March. She may well be (quite rightly) worried that Harry might change his mind and want to stay. Once he's on UK soil, Harry could have applied to the court for an order to keep Archie here.

Given her application for British Citizenship, a court may well order that Archie remains in the UK. He was born here and is in line to the UK throne.

Her ONLY option was to persuade Harry to move to America with her and Archie. If they settle there, then that is Archie's home, and that is where he will remain, whatever happens to the marriage.

Look at Princess Haya, she had to wait for a legitimate reason to fly to the UK, before she could take refuge in London and issue a case in our High Court for custody of her children. If there had been no ill treatment of her and his older children, they likely would have been returned to Dubai.

As for the foundation - that is something that is unlikely to work outside of the royal family, for Meghan and Harry who do not have the wealth of Bill and Melinda Gates, nor the background and experience of the Obamas.

I think the foundation is to appease Harry, who really has nothing to do in LA. It provides him with something to do, and which he is familiar.

I'm sure she wants the A List lifestyle and money - and would like to re-enter the acting world. But I suspect this is more about getting Archie "home".

Might not have been on this thread, but I absolutely agree with the person who said they should have gone off to rural Wales in the beginning and had a slow entrance to the royal family. Flying helicopters would have been a great thing for Harry to do, given him purpose.

It appears they have ignored all PR advice, particularly in announcing this today. Again I have no evidence, but I suspect this is going to the extreme other end of the spectrum, having had a full communication team before, with whom they clearly did not agree.

Even if the papers got wind of the registration of the foundation, they could have just said nothing and everyone would have forgotten about it in a months time.

I also think they chose the moment in order to piggyback off the Queen's speech... oh look there's an announcement from the Queen's grandson... it keeps them relevant.

PorridgeShotgun · 07/04/2020 19:57

Psychologically I find them individually and as a pairing fascinating. I know the concept of birth order influencing personality is up there with phrenology and horoscopes and other pleasing non-scientific hokum, but honestly they are both such "last born children".

They're both spoiled, indulged, used to other people smoothing the way for them, but also ferociously determined to get out from another's shadow.

Part of their problem with the new ventures is that they both seem to be "ideas" people, with very little thought in how to execute or indeed plan for them.

HAICH has spent his entire life - Royal and military within institutions that run on hierarchies, structures, and tradition. Aside from his field combat I doubt hes ever spent much time ever having to wonder about what decisions need to be made or how to execute them in terms of forward planning. Meghan at least has a bit more life experience behind her, but her primary successes are all again based on executing ideas someone else has done the heavy lifting on. As an actress her entire role is scripted, directed and orchestrated with minimal input needed on her behalf. I'm basing this solely on the one role I know her for which is Rachel in Suits. I watched 7 seasons of that, and I will laugh in your face anyone who tries to convince me of Streep levels of complex characterisation. Markle was the gorgeous love interest whose main function was to enable the lead and occasionally look at him doe eyed......waiiittt a minute!

The Tig was her pet project but I think by that point she was just famous and connected enough, to have "people" to do the fiddly nuts and bolts parts like marketing and web design.

There's no shame in not having the follow through, but it seems like a spectacularly bad idea when you've uprooted your lives on the basis of all these great ideas, to not have them shored up.

PorridgeShotgun · 07/04/2020 20:00

Sorry paragraph break fails all over the place there.

Archwell sounds like a vack of the catalogue advert for orthopaedic inserts.

Myimaginarypenguinhasfleas · 07/04/2020 20:21

They're both spoiled, indulged, used to other people smoothing the way for them, but also ferociously determined to get out from another's shadow.

This is very true of H, not so much of M I don't think as she never was in anyone else's shadow. Her issue is more What Meghan Wants, Meghan Gets.

Myimaginarypenguinhasfleas · 07/04/2020 20:43

That sounded snippy, let me explain better.

I agree H has the characteristics of a last born child. He has been babied somewhat. I suspect he got pushed around a fair bit by W, and has a rebellious and contrary streak as a result.

M I think has the characteristics of an only child. She was the one TM had the time and money to invest in. She's used to getting what she wants, and being an object of adoration without any competition from siblings (her half siblings being older than her and part of a different family).

PorridgeShotgun · 07/04/2020 22:30

myimaginarypenguinhasfleas, you make some really good points about Meghan; I hadn't realised she was effectively an only child. I think because her half sister Samantha is always in the press agitating that I had it in my head that the sibling rivalry cut both ways.

Needmoresleep · 07/04/2020 23:25

Archewell eyebrow sculpting

Needmoresleep · 07/04/2020 23:26

Archewell flat and sensible shoes?

Winterlife · 07/04/2020 23:28

MM is an only child, but her half siblings did come and live with them. That, allegedly, was part of the reason for the divorce between MM's parents - Doria couldn't cope with the siblings, who were teens at the time.

StartupRepair · 07/04/2020 23:50

Surely a basic rule of naming a foundation is to find a name that is obviously easy to pronounce in a range of languages. As a native English speaker I can't work out if it is pronounced Archwel, Archerwell or Archiewell. Or Arkerwell.

Myimaginarypenguinhasfleas · 08/04/2020 00:18

I'm not sure MM's relationship with the older Markle children was anything like a sibling one, even though they briefly lived together.

AmIbeingTreasonable · 08/04/2020 10:10

OMG type archewellfoundation.com into a browser 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Needmoresleep · 08/04/2020 10:15

Wow! Funny. Did someone just do that?

Allflightscancelled · 08/04/2020 11:00

That is hilarious Grin

Mean but totally, hilarious Grin Grin Grin

Wheresthebeach · 08/04/2020 11:39

Agree with fleas and shotgun. Neither of these two has the ‘common touch’ needed to make this sort of endeavour work. They are alienating people, not galvanising them. A spoiled, attention seeking pair. They will get some celebrity support, and I suspect use professional social media practices to get followers and make a splash but long term I don’t think they have the ability to ‘speak to people’.

Wheresthebeach · 08/04/2020 11:43

OMG...archewellfoundation.com Wonder how long that will stay up on YouTube. Searing.

HarryDaylight · 08/04/2020 11:46

That's grim. A massive pr clunk. They've been ridiculed globally now.

DandyArgo · 08/04/2020 13:08

Oh my. How on earth did they not secure the dot com name? Or was it hacked? Either way it seems like that re-direct has been up for at least 21 hours going by the comments. And the comments are all enjoying the prank immensely and/or agreeing with the suitability of the song.

It's a very misogynistic song. Cracking tune though, just shame about the lyrics.