I'm very dubious about it if i am honest, but i say this a the owner of two little fuckers, one of which has since we had him in march (hes a rescue) systematically destroyed my house and my sex life (sleeps in our bed). So maybe im not the best person to comment!!!!
This really isn't a thread about a thread, but it was inspired by a thread on here at the moment where someone is struggling with crate training and made a comment that she has to have him trained so she can leave him alone in the house.
I will probably get flammed to within an inch of my life but to me, if i dog is creating merry hell because it doesn't want to be kept confined then just don't do it? Also, i think there is so much potential for missuse - locking a dog in a crate all day while you go out for instance? This can't be right??
I'm not really buying the "but the dog needs a secure area to call its own, it likes it once it gets used to it" either. Yes, they need a safe and secure area where it will be left alone. One of my JRTs likes his basket under the small table by the sofa. The other one likes to lay with me ALL THE FECKING TIME! So its horses for courses surely?
I am not saying the crate is bad - but just that surely if people are having issues getting the dog to accept it, it is because it doesn't come naturally to what is essentially a social animal to be incarcerated on its own. Yes, in the end, like the less fortunate of pavlov's dogs, they accept it as inevitable and probably don't have any lasting damage and come to enjoy the safe area etc, but it seems like a whole lot of hassle to me, just give the dog a bed at the foot of your bed, he doesn't want to be on his own, so why make him?