Blimey, I go for a quiet evening doing some sewing and come back to find I'm a "stalker", "insane" and all sorts of things.
A couple of points. The OP was making a specific, RL appeal for help - Take my dog or it dies; not a general discussion about manshapes, fake tans or anything else. Any answers on this thread should be seen very much in that context - the whole point of the post was for a RL resolution by the dog being rehomed, and for that to happen, at some point the OP would need to "out" herself to somebody. Also, in her OP, the poster gave details of her county, the initials of the rescue and a link to another website where she had posted information about the dog and her attempts to rehome it. The OP has outed the rescue in this post - I haven't.
It is disingenuous to say that as the OP has not named the rescue directly here on MN, but only on LL that their identity is secret. If I were to refer frequently to my blog "Scuttlebutter and the Greyhounds of Doom.blogspot.com" I think it would be fair to say I was outing myself even if the blog is a seperate website.
In her second post, the OP again discussed at length (17.19 on Weds 6 June) her posting on LL (which details the rescue concerned).
I have only made three posts on this entire thread. In the first, I was extremely polite and offered practical help including contact details for several rescues that specialise in sighthounds. I also invited the OP to PM me if she needed any further help. As many people in the Doghouse know, I volunteer for a number of sighthound charities.
During the thread, the specific rescue involved has been criticised by a number of posters and rescues in general have come in for a great deal of stick. I was extremely concerned about this case since the rescue concerned is a highly reputable one, and the people who run it are experienced professionals. I sought (and received) some clarification on the case from the rescue concerned. Without naming it or the OP, I then put a second, short and polite post up identifying that I was willing to act as a go between if any of the posters who had expressed their concerns so vocally had any questions or required any clarification. Such questions need not have been about the specific details of this particular case, but could for instance have been about the rescue's homecheck policies for instance or their stance on PTS - all issues that had come up for discussion on the thread.
Unlike some posters, at no point have I been rude to the OP or personally abusive to anyone else. I have not personally identified her, and neither have I directly identified the rescue concerned. All I have done is offer (politely and genuinely) to help prevent the unnecessary death of a lurcher and to volunteer my services if information about the rescue was needed.