Slubber,
I really get why people are assigning personal motives to my arguments. It is silly. I could just do the same to others, ' oh you are defending pure breeds because that is what you have or because you are a professional breeder'. I am avoiding that nonsense because it doesn't matter.
I think I read somewhere that 75% of the dogs in UK are purebred. I would suggest that probably we should reverse the ratio, 75% mutts and 25% pure bred. Or something along those lines.
I just mentioned this thread to my husband, and he started laughing. He is Icelandic and the only purebred dog variety they have is the Icelandic sheep dog. This was bred to help farmers with the unique task of herding in the Icelandic climate and terrain.
Most people have mutts and when he was growing up, if people wanted dogs, they just mated two mutts and the families involved gave out pups to friends. No money exchanged hands and the dogs were neutered afterwards. There was really no major issue of stray dogs or overpopulation. And most importantly, no industry of professional breeders selectively breeding and selling dogs.
It might have changed now, but I am so surprised that this is such an alien and horrible concept to the average mnetter. I just have to assume it is a unique breed that lurks in this space.
And sorry for not responding to every point. This is a forum, and as such, just an informal exchange while one is doing other stuff 