I realize this is not the politically correct thing to say, but having watched the programme, and having thought about it, I think it?s wrong.
I think it?s one thing to be a host surrogate and to essentially carry someone else?s embrio, you are just using your body as a vescle then really. But to inceminate yourself with someone else?s sperm and carry your own biological children so you can give them away is just wrong IMO.
Yes it may be selfless in terms of that you are thinking of someone else and not yourself when giving away your children, but who is thinking of the children? Both the children you give away and the ones that have to stand by and watch you do it? How are the children of the surrogate parent supposed to feel when they watch their mummy give their brother/sister away to someone else? And when they know they have siblings out there that must affect them surely, even if it doesn?t affect them as a child it must surely do so as an adult.
And what of the children that are given way? How must it affect them growing up, knowing that their mummy kept some of their biological siblings but chose to give them to other parents. However altruistic that decision may appear to be, the rejection must be the same as it is for a child who is given up for adoption.
It just seems like trading babies as commodities.
And if it is so selfless then why aren?t these women doing it for free? Why are they being paid 10 grand and up for doing it? ?expenses? it?s called but let?s be honest it doesn?t cost 10 grand to be pregnant. It?s only called expenses because selling babies is illegal, but that?s essentially what this is.
If you gave birth to a baby and then sold it you would be judged harshly by everyone, including the authorities I have no doubt. And yet selling children before they are born is considered selfless.