Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Telly addicts

The Claudia Winkleman Show

178 replies

mumofoneAloneandwell · 13/03/2026 22:52

On now? Anyone watching?

Its a chatshow in the Graham Norton slot

I was gonna give it a miss but here I am

OP posts:
WhatWouldTheDoctorDo · 13/03/2026 23:46

I thought it was ok. I’m not a fan of Tom Allen generally, but he didn’t annoy me too much tonight. I think Claudia needs time to settle in to it. The audience interactions were a bit odd. I will give it another few goes and see what she’s like with different mixes of guests.

YellingAway · 13/03/2026 23:47

I thought it was ok and it’s going to take time to see what works and what doesn’t. It’s also unfair to compare to the excellent Graham Norton who has spent years honing his craft from his days on C4.

RoseTulips2023 · 13/03/2026 23:48

Jeff Goldblum reading a couple of lines from Tom Allen's book was bizarre but the incident was saved by the hilarious look of horror on Tom's face.

RoseTulips2023 · 13/03/2026 23:50

YellingAway · 13/03/2026 23:47

I thought it was ok and it’s going to take time to see what works and what doesn’t. It’s also unfair to compare to the excellent Graham Norton who has spent years honing his craft from his days on C4.

Graham Norton was great from the beginning - he stood in for the regular chat host, they were both nominated for a prize and he won.

blondeascustard · 13/03/2026 23:51

It felt awkward and nervous.

Pusstachio · 13/03/2026 23:54

I did love her jewellery and signet ring. Will probably check in next week to check her outfits as she always looks so cool. I wonder if it’d be better with just Brits? Claude is naturally hilarious in an irreverent off beat way to me but not in a way that translates well to sucking up to inflated Hollywood types.

HandbagsAndHighHeels · 13/03/2026 23:56

RoseTulips2023 · 13/03/2026 23:48

Jeff Goldblum reading a couple of lines from Tom Allen's book was bizarre but the incident was saved by the hilarious look of horror on Tom's face.

Tom Allen is an absolute sweetie! I’ve met him, been in his company several times and he’s much as you see on tv.
Naturally funny, very quick and always chattering away.
Hes always been beautifully dressed and smelt divine.
Claudia was lucky that she had him to carry the show tonight.
But - that bloody fringe!✂️ ✂️

BeaLola · 13/03/2026 23:58

I like CW but on balance I didn’t like this -too stilted , let’s bring a dog on for 2 nano seconds

I love Graham Norton - he is smooth velvet, this was dull even with Jeff Goldblum

AlPaccacino · 14/03/2026 00:00

God. This is dire.

augustusglupe · 14/03/2026 00:07

Why did they presume she could carry this off?
I’ve watched Graeme since his Ch4 days on So Graeme Norton. That was 25 years ago & he’s spent all that time perfecting his craft. He’s a comedian too which helps. Claudia is neither.

likelysuspect · 14/03/2026 00:11

When Graeme Norton started off he was a lot more quirky and irreverent, then he started having much bigger stars on and turned all sucky uppy

I never liked it after that

I liked this tonight, hopefully she'll continue having people on the show who are able to laugh at themselves and not be all 'Hollywood', like tonight, sillly funny anecdotes and just chit chat.

DeftWasp · 14/03/2026 00:13

augustusglupe · 14/03/2026 00:07

Why did they presume she could carry this off?
I’ve watched Graeme since his Ch4 days on So Graeme Norton. That was 25 years ago & he’s spent all that time perfecting his craft. He’s a comedian too which helps. Claudia is neither.

Add to that Graeme re-defined the chat show, arguably Jonathan Ross did too, but Graeme did a better job - it went from perfectly serviceable interviews with a bit of humour (Parkinson, Wogan, Late Late Show etc..) to a far more frenetic, comedic, irreverent affair.

This, to me seems more hum drum, more conventional, and therefore not as good.

sittingonabeach · 14/03/2026 00:14

According to my tv guide it was meant to be Josh Widdicombe not Tom Allen

Whatwouldnanado · 14/03/2026 00:15

I miss Parkinson.

OonaStubbs · 14/03/2026 00:22

Why does Claudia Winkleman keep getting work with the BBC?

RoseTulips2023 · 14/03/2026 00:23

OonaStubbs · 14/03/2026 00:22

Why does Claudia Winkleman keep getting work with the BBC?

To be fair she's great in Strictly, Traitors and The Piano. This format doesn't suit her.

Stopsnowing · 14/03/2026 06:10

I am a huge Claudia fan but turned this off after a bit because it was so dull. Eggs? pencils?

on Graham Norton the guests look like they are having a hoot (plus thrilled to be getting an actual drink) and he somehow gets them all bantering.

everyone was so awkward on this.

Claudia is great on the piano and traitors interacting with the contestants showing great warmth and wit but I think she is a journalist not a chat show host so she needs to be doing something more substantial eg more like Parkinson or have guests that she actually wants to talk to about things that matter. The show needs a different format and focus.

i have tickets to an upcoming recording - you have to dress up and hang around for hours (not guaranteed entry) so I doubt I will now go.

stayawayfromthattrapdoor · 14/03/2026 07:10

I love Claudia and wanted this to be good but it really wasn’t.

I’m wondering how much of that is down to the production/prep - the Graham Norton show uses a lot of pre-prepared anecdotes from the guests - there’s obviously a lot of skill in making these look spontaneous and building out from them but every guest has a funny story to tell which is the backbone

This seemed to be relying much more on spontaneity, treating it more like an improv performance- hoping that if you gave the guests some random topics it would be enough to spark something - but it felt like it never really caught light and the guests were unsure what was expected of them.

MyThreeWords · 14/03/2026 07:34

SemmaLina · 13/03/2026 22:56

That American git Geoff is awful

Grin😂Grin

TheFarriersDaughter · 14/03/2026 07:41

Oh dear, I got into bed all ready to watch this - and must have fallen asleep just before it started. Your reviews aren’t encouraging!

RedToothBrush · 14/03/2026 08:01

Claudia's obvious wig was off putting from the start. Hair doesn't hang like that and the sheen is wrong - it looks fake. Add in the fringe which got in her way on a couple of occasions which she noticeably didn't touch but just wiggled her head (probably because if she touches she may nudge the wig out of place). I love her style and normally it's not an issue but in this setting it just almost goes off like a klaxon because there's nothing else to focus on.

Claudia's strength is in managing chaos. The problem with a chat show with these type of guests is everyone is out to be polite for the most part. Cos PR and staying on brand. When she did youth chat shows they were chaos because of the characters on them and the levels of drugs and alcohol. These guests weren't shit faced before going on. Instead they were rather vacuous.

That's another issue Claudia's strength is in making real people come forward and shine. This lot are just dull and vacuous and really rather fake. This is probably why Tom Allen looked good. Not just because he's a comedian but because he brought that ordinariness with him.

"Hey I've got a book to sell, but my publisher has told me not to say anything about x, y or z not do anything controversial or not within my pr brand" generally doesn't make for good TV. This is the issue.

So Claudia needs guests with big personalities who are likely to clash or be slightly awkward together. The problem with Jennifer and Vanessa is they blended into each other and were like brown paint on brown wallpaper against the rather brown set. Probably mates of Claudia but just dullsville.

And yes the decor probably is affecting the interviews. It's dull and sober as a backdrop rather than more fun.

I agree she's gone for more conventional chat show - the decor is a nod to 70s and 80s chat shows. I don't know how she is going to find her niche against Graham and Jonathan for this reason. She needs guests liable to fall off the back of that sofa or start a fight with each other. Or have someone ordinary with an amazing back story no one has heard.

I almost want her to have someone ordinary but interesting on the sofa with the guests to completely throw everything off. Someone who isn't PR briefed and isn't trying to flog shit. Bring on a busker and make Jeff sing along. (This is probably what the dog was about but it was half arsed and not stupid enough). The audience was contrived and really boring - they all dressed the same and were really polite and respectful. Again doesn't work.

Claudia made a name for herself in live TV and that's worth remembering. She was never the straightman - that was Tess. She was always moving around, not stock still. The audience expects something more - something lively and a bit kooky.

With that in mind and those guests I think in a way she was doomed to fail on that first episode because it didn't hit those notes and expectations. Instead you kept looking at the wig because that's where the greatest amount of action ended up happening.

HandbagsAndHighHeels · 14/03/2026 08:08

RedToothBrush · 14/03/2026 08:01

Claudia's obvious wig was off putting from the start. Hair doesn't hang like that and the sheen is wrong - it looks fake. Add in the fringe which got in her way on a couple of occasions which she noticeably didn't touch but just wiggled her head (probably because if she touches she may nudge the wig out of place). I love her style and normally it's not an issue but in this setting it just almost goes off like a klaxon because there's nothing else to focus on.

Claudia's strength is in managing chaos. The problem with a chat show with these type of guests is everyone is out to be polite for the most part. Cos PR and staying on brand. When she did youth chat shows they were chaos because of the characters on them and the levels of drugs and alcohol. These guests weren't shit faced before going on. Instead they were rather vacuous.

That's another issue Claudia's strength is in making real people come forward and shine. This lot are just dull and vacuous and really rather fake. This is probably why Tom Allen looked good. Not just because he's a comedian but because he brought that ordinariness with him.

"Hey I've got a book to sell, but my publisher has told me not to say anything about x, y or z not do anything controversial or not within my pr brand" generally doesn't make for good TV. This is the issue.

So Claudia needs guests with big personalities who are likely to clash or be slightly awkward together. The problem with Jennifer and Vanessa is they blended into each other and were like brown paint on brown wallpaper against the rather brown set. Probably mates of Claudia but just dullsville.

And yes the decor probably is affecting the interviews. It's dull and sober as a backdrop rather than more fun.

I agree she's gone for more conventional chat show - the decor is a nod to 70s and 80s chat shows. I don't know how she is going to find her niche against Graham and Jonathan for this reason. She needs guests liable to fall off the back of that sofa or start a fight with each other. Or have someone ordinary with an amazing back story no one has heard.

I almost want her to have someone ordinary but interesting on the sofa with the guests to completely throw everything off. Someone who isn't PR briefed and isn't trying to flog shit. Bring on a busker and make Jeff sing along. (This is probably what the dog was about but it was half arsed and not stupid enough). The audience was contrived and really boring - they all dressed the same and were really polite and respectful. Again doesn't work.

Claudia made a name for herself in live TV and that's worth remembering. She was never the straightman - that was Tess. She was always moving around, not stock still. The audience expects something more - something lively and a bit kooky.

With that in mind and those guests I think in a way she was doomed to fail on that first episode because it didn't hit those notes and expectations. Instead you kept looking at the wig because that's where the greatest amount of action ended up happening.

Do you really believe it’s a wig?

I ask, in all seriousness, as I’ve often wondered…

I guess it would be an excellent disguise, I doubt we’d recognise her without “the hair” and the heavy makeup…🤷‍♀️ At least her down time would be peaceful!

muppahuppapuppa · 14/03/2026 08:18

It was sooo dull. I switched off before the end.

If it is a wig get a better one or a shorter fringe!

(how can she advertise shampoo if it is?) 😂

sashagabadon · 14/03/2026 08:20

She’s too whimsical and abstract as an interviewer although I love her in traitors and strictly.

sashagabadon · 14/03/2026 08:23

I also think that is her real hair not a wig. If a wig we’d know by now as showbiz is v gossipy and it would be common knowledge it’s a wig. Which it isn’t 😁

Swipe left for the next trending thread