Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Telly addicts

Tell Me Lies Tell Me Sweet Little Lies | Traitors 2026 | Thread 7 | Spoiler Free!

1000 replies

CaveMum · 14/01/2026 20:32

Link to previous thread: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/telly_addicts/5473255-whispers-in-the-confessional-traitors-2026-thread-6-spoiler-free?page=1

Welcome to Thread 7 of Traitors 2026.

This thread runs at TV pace so do not read any further if you are not up to date with the live broadcast. Whilst most discussion will be on the current series, inevitably people will refer to previous series/players/winners so reader beware if you’ve not seen the 3 previous editions, or the celebrity version.

While we welcome posters discussing their theories and speculating on relationships/connections between players, please don’t post spoilers from elsewhere that may ruin things for those of us who like to see things unfold over the course of the series.

The story so far (as at end of Ep 6):

Traitors
Hugo
Rachel
Stephen
Fiona (Secret Traitor)

Murdered
Netty
Ben
Maz
Reece

Banished
Judy (Faithful)
Hugo (Traitor)
Ross (Faithful)
Amanda (Faithful)
Fiona (Traitor)

This thread is starting mid-way through Episode 7, so goodness only knows what is going to happen in the Round Table Showdown that is brewing.

The floor is yours…

Whispers in the Confessional | Traitors 2026 | Thread 6 | Spoiler Free! | Mumsnet

Link to previous thread: [[https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/telly_addicts/5472793-this-time-its-personal-traitors-2026-thread-5-spoiler-free?page=1 https:...

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/telly_addicts/5473255-whispers-in-the-confessional-traitors-2026-thread-6-spoiler-free?page=1

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
MrsLeonFarrell · 14/01/2026 21:55

Foxybyname · 14/01/2026 21:51

No, she wants a win for the Faithfuls. At cost to herself because as we know, she doesn't need them money. To me that shows that she just loves the show and really wanted to be on it.

Roxy is so unlikeable.
I really hope she is next to be banished.

She didn't seem to love the show much. If she had stayed under Rachel's radar and built up a following she could have won it for the faithfuls. A more successful Jaz from Series 2.

Instead she seemed outraged at the idea anyone would think they could fool her which was odd bearing in mind the game.

wheresthesnowgone · 14/01/2026 21:56

MrsLeonFarrell · 14/01/2026 20:45

I thought Harriet spoke out beautifully against Hugo but she completely different speaking to Rachel. She seems rude and angry for no reason that we have seen.

Yes, Harriet was FURIOUS and RUDE at breakfast, she really went full on Fiona there.

Then at the round table she didn't actually present a shred of evidence against Rachel which she'd been promising to do all day, and was just rude.

Harriet really shot herself in the foot at the round table and lost the thread of the game. - if she'd played it calmly and intelligently without losing her temper she could well have won the game.

pouletvous · 14/01/2026 21:56

Brightbluesomething · 14/01/2026 21:36

It wasn’t even a theory. Rachel voted fur someone who turned out to be a faithful. So did plenty of others which is why they’ve lost so many! She built it up so much at breakfast, I was expecting something more coherent.

She was right though. She knew Rachel was
a Traitor. How she worked it out, I don’t know but she was bang on

catley · 14/01/2026 21:56

I'm not usually a fan of recruitment but think they should've tonight as it's very risky with all the shields. I reckon they've gone with Jessie. I imagine she'll tell everyone but if she doesn't they will suspect recruitment.

Was tonight the first ordinary murder?
The first few were chosen by the secret traitor, then the murder in plain sight, then the questions?

Stephen showed himself to be very clever tonight in the turret.

I actually would love it if he and Rachel won together but not sure how likely that would be. Could you ever truly trust another traitor?!

Wheezygonzalez · 14/01/2026 21:56

MrsLeonFarrell · 14/01/2026 21:50

For me it isn't older women speaking their minds but how they are speaking that i find off putting. As someone who is between them in age I know it is possible to speak up assertively without being rude or losing my temper.

I wouldn’t be pleased if my Barrister spoke like that.

PinkPanther57 · 14/01/2026 21:57

wheresthesnowgone · 14/01/2026 21:56

Yes, Harriet was FURIOUS and RUDE at breakfast, she really went full on Fiona there.

Then at the round table she didn't actually present a shred of evidence against Rachel which she'd been promising to do all day, and was just rude.

Harriet really shot herself in the foot at the round table and lost the thread of the game. - if she'd played it calmly and intelligently without losing her temper she could well have won the game.

You’re right but I don’t think likeable or ordinary enough to win.

Maggiethecat · 14/01/2026 21:57

Beachtastic · 14/01/2026 21:46

Harriet reminds me of the barristers and law reporters I worked with at the Royal Courts of Justice in the early 1990s - very privileged, used to calling the shots, confident that they would always be in charge. I think perhaps the reason she lost it is that she just became profoundly distressed by not being in control of what was going on around her. It's frustrating and irritating for everyone, but more so for someone like her... she desperately needed to regain her sense of superiority over the plebs. (That sarcastic hand clap...!)

I really expected her evidence against Rachel to be more solid. Rachel was quite right when she said it was weak, and just sounded like the hunches everyone gets. Tonight's round table probably strengthened Rachel's position considerably.

What made it even more disappointing was Harriet's insistence that she absolutely KNEW who the "other two Traitors" were, apart from Rachel. How could she be so dogmatic about this? I'm not sure she was clever in sussing Rachel out after all... it looks more like just a case of "even a stopped clock tells the right time twice a day."

That kind of blind self-belief is a bit scary in a person, and probably attracts them to certain lines of work (e.g. Amanda!) where they wield enormous power.

Difference between Harriet and Amanda is that Harriet was right about 2 traitors, helped get rid of one and certainly didn’t make a traitor her best pal.

RubieChewsDay · 14/01/2026 21:57

Passingthrough123 · 14/01/2026 21:55

Did you read the Erin Kelly piece in the Guardian today? She said producers sent an invite round to loads of crime writers to audition and Harriet was one of many who put themselves forward and she got picked. So she was 100% willing to go on the show – she was a massive fan beforehand.

Agree she was willing, but I think everyone under estimates how stressful the shoot is. I thought about applying for about 2 mins until I realised that I just can’t spend that much time around other people!!

Itwasallyellow2 · 14/01/2026 21:57

WriterOfWrongs · 14/01/2026 21:47

I would not be surprised if Harriet and her agent and one of the producers planned out in advance an optimum amount of time for her to stay in the show, and how she should try and go out.

I said on the last thread that I don't think the order of who went in front of the mirrors and 'won' the chance to speak to the Traitors was random. I firmly believe the producers engineered it so Harriet could be one. They would know from their private chats with her what her theories were.

100%. Harriet didn’t really want the opportunity to speak with The Traitors; that much was clear. She wanted to play the game her own way and not be thrust into the confessional. I think this was a production manoeuvre to ‘make good TV’ and Harriet knew it, hence wanting an exit. I think she also felt that she was never going to be listened to as a middle-aged woman in a younger cohort and, having seen other people of a similar age-group be banished or murdered, decided to control her own exit rather than be ‘done to’.

MrsLeonFarrell · 14/01/2026 21:58

wheresthesnowgone · 14/01/2026 21:56

Yes, Harriet was FURIOUS and RUDE at breakfast, she really went full on Fiona there.

Then at the round table she didn't actually present a shred of evidence against Rachel which she'd been promising to do all day, and was just rude.

Harriet really shot herself in the foot at the round table and lost the thread of the game. - if she'd played it calmly and intelligently without losing her temper she could well have won the game.

Even if she'd kept her sights on Rachel she could have made it very uncomfortable for her going forward. Instead she widened her focus and confused the table. She left and achieved nothing.

Passingthrough123 · 14/01/2026 21:58

MrsLeonFarrell · 14/01/2026 21:55

She didn't seem to love the show much. If she had stayed under Rachel's radar and built up a following she could have won it for the faithfuls. A more successful Jaz from Series 2.

Instead she seemed outraged at the idea anyone would think they could fool her which was odd bearing in mind the game.

Yes, her bad-tempered outburst at breakfast was not nice to watch – definitely had an element of "you will all listen to me and do as I say!" I do think she suffered though from not staying to socialise after the round tables – she wasn't forming as close alliances as the others.

NewYearNewYouKitten · 14/01/2026 21:59

As my DD pointed out, after a run of people of colour being voted out, it's now the turn of a succession of batshit menopausal white women to go!

C8H10N4O2 · 14/01/2026 21:59

catley · 14/01/2026 21:56

I'm not usually a fan of recruitment but think they should've tonight as it's very risky with all the shields. I reckon they've gone with Jessie. I imagine she'll tell everyone but if she doesn't they will suspect recruitment.

Was tonight the first ordinary murder?
The first few were chosen by the secret traitor, then the murder in plain sight, then the questions?

Stephen showed himself to be very clever tonight in the turret.

I actually would love it if he and Rachel won together but not sure how likely that would be. Could you ever truly trust another traitor?!

At the beginning I thought either Rachel or Stephen would throw the other under a bus but at this stage they might hold together.

Was I imagining it or did Rachel look at Stephen in surprise when he suggested recruiting Matt as the sacrifice?

WriterOfWrongs · 14/01/2026 21:59

RubieChewsDay · 14/01/2026 21:53

I don’t think you can plan those things in the way you think you can, and the optimum publicity would have been for her to win.

I suspect she wound herself up in what she was going to say both to the traitors and then at breakfast and then spent a very uncomfortable day with people avoiding her, so decided she’d had enough, and didn’t want to stay any longer.

I meant to say a minimum optimum amount of time.

I definitely don't think you can fully plan or foresee everything, but what I meant was that you can come up with a range of options. She's a crime writer, a plotter, she'll have thought it through.

I think she knew she was unlikely to win, (always stacked against the traitors), this was a good opportunity for her to have a big moment, and she went for it.

peacefulpeach · 14/01/2026 21:59

Sparklesandspandexgallore · 14/01/2026 21:46

Yes ageism and sexism is definitely playing out here.
An older woman who speaks her mind, how very dare she.
I wanted Harriet to win with Jessie. I like James too and even Sam is beginning to appeal more to me.
Fair play to Rachel if she wins. I don’t think Stephen is very good at all, he has ridden on Rachel’s coat tails. This episode is the only one in which he has genuinely contributed anything.
I too agree that this series is feeling more like torture for some of the players who seem to be pushed to their tolerance limits.

Totally agree. On this thread also. Women - outspoken! Older! Fck me they’re all witches!

MrsLeonFarrell · 14/01/2026 22:00

NewYearNewYouKitten · 14/01/2026 21:59

As my DD pointed out, after a run of people of colour being voted out, it's now the turn of a succession of batshit menopausal white women to go!

Is Rachel now the oldest left in? She's 42 i think.

LighthouseLED · 14/01/2026 22:00

NewYearNewYouKitten · 14/01/2026 21:59

As my DD pointed out, after a run of people of colour being voted out, it's now the turn of a succession of batshit menopausal white women to go!

It’s never the interchangeable cohort, is it?

Passingthrough123 · 14/01/2026 22:01

NewYearNewYouKitten · 14/01/2026 21:59

As my DD pointed out, after a run of people of colour being voted out, it's now the turn of a succession of batshit menopausal white women to go!

Nice misogyny from your DD.🙄

LighthouseLED · 14/01/2026 22:01

peacefulpeach · 14/01/2026 21:59

Totally agree. On this thread also. Women - outspoken! Older! Fck me they’re all witches!

It’s not the being outspoken or older, it’s the way that Harriet spoke at breakfast in particular.

I’d be equally uncomfortable with a younger woman or any age man speaking in the same way.

peacefulpeach · 14/01/2026 22:02

Itwasallyellow2 · 14/01/2026 21:50

Absolutely agree! If I were quite intelligent, I think I’d eventually get really frustrated at being trapped in a castle with a whole load of people who are either dim, shallow or citing FBI training. I don’t blame Harriet for wanting to get on with writing her book to be honest; I would have lost my patience too.

Edited

‘Citing FBI training’

😂😂

PinkPanther57 · 14/01/2026 22:03

So who’s next for chop?

Lilactimes · 14/01/2026 22:03

Itwasallyellow2 · 14/01/2026 21:23

Yes, agreed. The three women, all middle-aged, banished by a younger cohort. There is a pattern here. And all three connected in some way with the law, police, crime.

I agree it seems weird but they all behaved a bit strangely - especially Fiona!

Lilactimes · 14/01/2026 22:04

MrsLeonFarrell · 14/01/2026 20:45

I thought Harriet spoke out beautifully against Hugo but she completely different speaking to Rachel. She seems rude and angry for no reason that we have seen.

Yes - totally agree. Very eloquent against Hugo but just rude and belligerent in this episode. Made her very unlikeable.

WriterOfWrongs · 14/01/2026 22:05

The "batshit menopausal women" (Hmm) all did do a kamikaze move though.
Fiona would have stayed under the radar had she not turned on Rachel.
Harriet offered herself up on a plate, and that was definitely a controlled move on her part. She said herself on Uncloaked she went out on her terms and how many can say that.

So it's hardly like they were picked off simply because of their age.

Suspiciousminds2 · 14/01/2026 22:08

Harriet, extremely intelligent yes, socially intelligent? Perhaps not so much. Yes she may have been frustrated and irritated but a wise woman would have known to keep her frustrations in check. She seems to have prioritised being right, over being liked, which eventually lead to her leaving, and rachel staying. Rachel’s plan of befriending some good faithfuls is working. Harriets outbursts at breakfast did her no favours with some wanting her out simply because she was rude to a popular player.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.