Credible - wanker bailiffs not caring about the individual
Not credible - getting out with any bags/electronics intact
Credible - bloke expecting sex in lieu of rent
Not credible - that she wouldn't realise this
Credible - meeting a rich screw-up at uni
Not credible - him going off the deep end re adopting
Credible - writing about sex work
Not credible - having her actual photo printed/no SS involvement
Credible - loving her child
Not credible - having no SS involvement/child being so positive/child being so clean in the context of them being thrown out etc
Like a pp I would be interested how she and Selby met, who he attacked for her, how she went from gaining a degree to ending up doing sex work etc
The episode with the trolling was a reference/rebuke imho to those on here/on Tattle who alleged/said similar irl about her "credentials", her revelations, her child etc She was alleged to be writing as a character/performance art, being middle class, won't somebody think of the kid etc Similar to JM. Others said she had used their anecdotes.
No receipts though - and there have been enough examples in the past of memoirs not being clearcut-James Frey was accused of fabrication, Augusten Burroughs of defamation/sensationalism, JT LeRoy was a hoax, Anthony Godby Johnson was a hoax, Dave Eggers stated from the outset parts of his book were fictionalised. You'd have thought therefore if there was an actual story there regarding CC's accounts of her lived experience being dodgy, she'd have been cancelled by now.