24 hours in police custody

[Sharpie0870]

Is anyone watching?
These parents are GUILTY!!

@mrkramps maybe he's worn his voice out with all that shouting

Apparently she’s living in Great Yarmouth with her father and stepmother and is pregnant again by a bloke who has a photo of them both as his profile picture on Facebook.

Her father was posting links to the programme yesterday, but deleted them when he began being trolled by people angry that he was supporting his daughter and calling her a murderer. Before the deletion one of his friends (presumably) robustly defended him
And LUcci, saying that she was as much a victim of Kane Mitchell and was an abused woman, as her sentence demonstrates.

Incidentally, why do they all have non private facebook’s? Just like frankie smith and family? I don’t get why anyone would have a non private Facebook, let alone a person in the negative public eye?

I was surprised the police let Kane know during questioning that his neighbours had provided witness statements. He seemed like the sort of dickhead who would 'go and sort them out' when released on bail.

@DillonPanthersTexas

I was surprised the police let Kane know during questioning that his neighbours had provided witness statements. He seemed like the sort of dickhead who would 'go and sort them out' when released on bail.

No way am I tattling on that maniac without witness protection. Maybe they offered and we didn't see it?

That evil cunt knew Little Teddie wasn't his long before the police told him.
The scene at the hospital car park. I would have turned the cameras off and HELPED him into the car head first.

Not one of their tears were genuine.

No way am I tattling on that maniac without witness protection.

Yes - that was possibly why she didn't as well - and the fact her alleged location has now been shared on this thread has possibly put her and her family into an unsafe position too.

I really wish people would think before they post sometimes.

another scum story.

@Bluntness100

It makes me wonder what sort of a life Lucci and Kane had that they think this is a normal way to behave and have no comprehension of the impact of this on the children

The fact her father chucked them out and said his behaviour was controlling shows that her at least potentially wasn’t raised this way.

Kane also needed a responsible adult in the interviews to ensure he understood, and he was in his thirties, which potentially indicates additional needs.

Lucy knew about the abuse of her own kids, her own daughters testimony shows it. So both her and Kane lied and knew what was occuring was wrong. I think that’s why she was saying the kids weren’t impacted, as she knew it meant she was culpable, she was protecting herself as well as him.

I simply can’t understand why she got two years community service for that neglect, there must be some thing not shown, which mitigated her behaviour.

The fact her father chucked them out and said his behaviour was controlling shows that her at least potentially wasn’t raised this way.

He shouldn't have left Lucci alone with Kane though, so there's probably history of neglect at least

[quote Ecosaurus]@Bluntness100

The fact her father chucked them out and said his behaviour was controlling shows that her at least potentially wasn’t raised this way.

The fact that her father chucked out his daughter with a man he thought was abusive and controlling, with her three young children, seems to be telling me something quite different to be honest.[/quote]
Agree

*The fact that her father chucked out his daughter with a man he thought was abusive and controlling, with her three young children, seems to be telling me something quite different to be honest.&

What could he have done? There was no reasoning with her, certainly from what I've seen when police spoke to her.

Weren't the children in care at that time as well?

I looked at her FB. One of her last posts, from 2019 has now got 1.2k comments from people calling her every name under the sun. Why on earth did she not delete this account?

I can see that the type of person that would do this, is also pretty likely to find out where she lives.

As I said upthread, she should have got a custodial sentence. She didn’t. This does not mean she should be at the mercy of a braying mob of vigilantes.

@APJ1

If he does indeed having learning difficulties or another condition as suggested, the defence surely jumped on that to mitigate his sentence.

I agree. I think the police were playing it safe/covering all bases so he couldn’t down the line get “diagnosed” with a learning need and get the whole interview declared null and void. I don’t think he had any learning difficulties and don’t think he needed that person there.

@Ecosaurus, it's very easy to find them on FB. You can also find the name of the new boyfriend.
Given that people have been posting messages about Teddie for over a year and that the profiles are still there, they are clearly completely brazen or beyond ignorant.

I would imagine that the reason why people like these two have open, still active Facebook accounts is the same reason that dodgy people often have several Facebook profiles; they have such chaotic lives/are so thick that they forget or lose their passwords and just set up another account. I watch a lot of these kinds of programs and often look up the people involved. Social media security settings are not high on their list of priorities. I once found the profile of a woman who had battered her partner to death and she had a 'be kind' banner on her page.

I can't help but find the spelling of her name LUCCI so unbelievably irritating.

@TinaTurning

I can't help but find the spelling of her name LUCCI so unbelievably irritating.

Me too! Is it meant to be pronounced like Gucci or Pucci?

Idiotic name spellings and low intellect go hand in hand.

Christ.

An eleven week old baby has been murdered and it’s the spelling of the mothers name you chose to post.

It’s pronounced Lu - see - as it was throughout the entire programme.

Calm down love, I posted about the crime too.

@Ecosaurus

Christ.

An eleven week old baby has been murdered and it’s the spelling of the mothers name you chose to post.

It’s pronounced Lu - see - as it was throughout the entire programme.

People can think about more than one thing at once

Idiotic name spellings and low intellect go hand in hand.

You’re doing yourself no favours there, the parent names the child. The statement is both illogical and judgmental. The child doesn’t undergo an iq test before being named, as individuals we are not responsible for how our parents named us, and it is nothing to do with our intellect. There is no correlation.

@Ecosaurus

No way am I tattling on that maniac without witness protection.

Yes - that was possibly why she didn't as well - and the fact her alleged location has now been shared on this thread has possibly put her and her family into an unsafe position too.

I really wish people would think before they post sometimes.

No. She's just a vile cunt.

You can't seriously think anyone would keep quiet about their baby being murdered, if they weren't.

"Oh, well he's abused, assaulted and now murdered my defenceless weeks old baby but I'd better pretend it wasn't him in case he turns nasty again".

Seriously?! FFS.

She didn't give a shit about that poor baby and that's why she was found guilty of allowing his abuse and murder. You only have to watch her actions and responses in the TV programme to know that she didn't give a fuck.

She knew the baby was replaceable after all. Just have another...

The evil in her is incredible.

I imagined plain ol’ Lucy might have changed her own name to a yoonique spelling, as I imagine no intelligent parent would label her with such a ludicrous moniker that anyone with half a brain is going to mis-pronounce.

"A few slaps here and there..." but he's done nothing wrong.

What's is this woman on about?

Sofia, as much as I agree wirh your position she was not found guilty of allowing his abuse and murder, she was cleared of that charge and only found guilty of neglect.