[quote hoxtonbabe]@thecatsthecats
That’s the thing, there were moments she should have gone but there was always that person just that smidgen worse, as Laura always managed to pip it to the post on taste. I feel like they picked the best of the worst with her rather than all of them being the best top 3.
Peter was consistently good, Dave steadily improved but Laura was exactly the same throughout, no matter how many times P & P told her about her presentation issues, she never improved, even Noel last week was trying to drive home that Hermine is usually a good baker. I do fully appreciate it’s how it is on the day, but in this rare circumstance ( as i don’t recall any other top 3 finalists being bad at presentation) I still think when faced with someone that has rarely presented anything visually to standard and someone who for the most part has made their bakes both presentable and tasty then you pick the person who is usually good all round, as we have a decent race, because there was no way Laura was going to match the presentation skills the men had and we all
Knew that. She literally presented a plonked pile of cakes for her showstopper, the men had some level of refinery and finesse to theirs.
I totally agree with you on the cone and i would have done the same, can you imagine making that out of cake, then covering in fondant!! The weight of it alone would have been an issue[/quote]
I feel like no one would have judged or known if the judges had gone 'yup, I've had enough of cakes that look like piles of goo' and booted her earlier.
I'm the final round interviewer at my company, and I get really frustrated at receiving candidates for second interview who were never going to meet the standard of the others. Not that they had something different to offer - people who were fundamentally not going to be able to achieve a key criteria.
(I've learned from my mistakes - I'll be forcing them to narrow down candidates next time!)
You eat with your eyes first, and nobody would pick Laura's bakes to eat.
I like the Robot Wars scoring personally - Style (presentation), Control (execution of skill), Damage (taste), Aggression (have they played it safe).
But then I tend to rank everything in life on that scale! I'd say Laura rated high on Damage, but Style was abysmal, Control variable, and Aggression actually minimal - she didn't do new or experimental flavours. As someone said upthread, it's hard to get cheese and onion wrong.