My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Telly addicts

THE ACCUSED ------ CHANNEL 5 now

317 replies

RTKangaMummy · 06/02/2017 21:02

Now

OP posts:
Report
RTKangaMummy · 06/02/2017 22:16

Yes very detached but her still believing Kyle is a good guy on one level

OP posts:
Report
CarTrack · 06/02/2017 22:16

'All couples fight'

No, they really don't.

I hate how that phrase is used to normalize domestic violence.

Report
grounddown · 06/02/2017 22:17

Can I just ask has the bf shaken baby so hard she's got all these issues or did the baby have existing issues? When the grandmother states everything the baby has I was shocked, is that a result of the incident?

Report
Ellapaella · 06/02/2017 22:17

I think she has witnesses something so traumatic she has gone through a process of blocking it from her mind so completely, like she is in total denial. If she allows herself to accept the truth she is admitting she has failed her children. She seems quite articulate in many ways yet very very immature. It's very strange.

Report
RTKangaMummy · 06/02/2017 22:18

Why doesn't anyone ask her .......

If you don't believe Kyle did it and you didn't then how did it happen?

OP posts:
Report
ColdFeetinWinter · 06/02/2017 22:18

I feel sorry for her and also frustrated and angry. I'm finding the legal approach infuriating. I know they are doing their job but it's not really helping her to come to terms or understand her behaviour and responsibility.

She is dressing more and more childlike as the trial approaches

Report
ColdFeetinWinter · 06/02/2017 22:19

Ground - brain damage was caused by shaking

Report
AdoraBell · 06/02/2017 22:20

I forgot it was on so have missed most of the programme. I did think from the adverts that she appeared detached. Not sure if that's guilt or a defence mechanism.

Report
Mousybrown · 06/02/2017 22:20

She is a victim of domestic abuse.....but I think she will be found guilt of failing to protect her child
The poor health has been caused by the ongoing brain damage and it's cumulative effects over time I assume

Report
RTKangaMummy · 06/02/2017 22:20

But she had something with her bottom bleeding too didn't it?

OP posts:
Report
karmassidekick · 06/02/2017 22:20

Yes it may be cognitive dissonance.
It was 101 they called not 999.
I think she will be found guilty because the texts and the interview prove she knew he was a risk.
I wondered the same about the babies injuries I didn't realise being shaken could cause all that.

Report
grounddown · 06/02/2017 22:20

Thanks cold - how does she think these issues happened then if no-one shook her!!

Report
Afreshstartplease · 06/02/2017 22:22

Why was the bloody grandma comparing to cot death!

Report
AnneElliott · 06/02/2017 22:22

Really odd how she prioritises Kyle over the kids! He admitted it on FB - what more evidence does she need?

Report
taptonaria27 · 06/02/2017 22:24

She's never offered any explanation for that which is what makes her so much less credible

Report
Ellapaella · 06/02/2017 22:25

If she openly accepts he was guilty then she accepts she was guilty of putting her children at risk and would have to plead guilty to the charges against her. Her mothers attitude is also very odd.

Report
ColdFeetinWinter · 06/02/2017 22:26

The Huntley comments show that she identifies child killers in just one way (monster) and she therefore thinks this means they are both innocent because they aren't monsters.

Many crimes are committed by people who aren't monsters 99% of the time. I suspect most domestic violence is committed by 99% nice men.

Report
Starlight2345 · 06/02/2017 22:27

18 years good.

Report
SoleBizzz · 06/02/2017 22:28

I do not understand her at all.

Report
Afreshstartplease · 06/02/2017 22:29

Well I think she should have got longer then 3 and a half...

Report
AnneElliott · 06/02/2017 22:30

Not surprising that she was found guilty when she wouldn't accept that Kyle had caused the injuries.

Report
KERALA1 · 06/02/2017 22:30

The right result imo

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

karmassidekick · 06/02/2017 22:30

Yes cold that's cognitive dissonance right there. The evidence doesn't match up to her preconceived ideas of good and evil so she's ignoring the evidence.
I hope she gets the help and support she needs when she gets out. Seems her mum will stick by her. Don't know how her mum didn't shake her or talk some sense into her, they were both so flat somehow

Report
Underthemoonlight · 06/02/2017 22:33

As a mother to a baby I can fathom having a baby endure so much abuse and stay by him if my dh did that i would of killed the bastard I would be angry. She's extremely cold. She's more bothered about how she looks than proving her innocence.

Report
ludothedog · 06/02/2017 22:33

She seems to have missing links in her thought process which again could be a coping strategy to deal with the fact that she cannot accept that her boyfriend hurt her child.

It was clear from those text messages that he had been violent and was scared of what he would do to the baby. She ignored that because it's easier to ignore than to deal with the reality of it.

It's like Cold said, she attributes child abusers as monsters - those deliberately hurting children for kicks - the reality is that most children are hurt by parents who love them but just don't have the parenting ability to cope with the demands of looking after them. She will need a lot of work to help her understand what she did wrong, and still may never be able to accept it.

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.