I posted a thread about this in chat tonight that got removed. But I basically said whilst I believe she is innocent and always have, I also feel uncomfortable about her lack of empathy or focus on others - Meredith, Patrick Lumumba etc.
But then I also reflected that maybe it's my internalised misogyny creeping up and making me uncomfortable to see a woman who doesn't spend her life feeling guilty and apologetic when actually she did nothing wrong to Meredith. Maybe we all need to be a bit more Amanda.
I do think it's distasteful that she's profiting 14 years later off the death of her friend who was raped and had her throat slit.
BUt the person who disturbed me the most in that documentary was the DM journalist who seemed over the moon he got a 'golden' story (a girl was killed FFS stop being so happy) and his total lack of regret about the salacious lies and slander he published about Amanda and her sex life. That 100% had an effect on the trial. It practically gave the prosecution ideas!
On another note, it's weird to see how the Italian justice system works. The prosecutor literally made up a whole conversation between 4 people, word for word, off nothing more than his imagination and uses that as evidence!!! Absolutely shocking! Why can they do that?
It seemed when the prosecution appealed the, erm, appeal, and Knox and Sollecito were once again found guilty it was because of literally nothing - no new forensic evidence, just got given a guilty verdict!