I agree the 12 critics didn't work - also it seemed unfair on the contestants who were penalised for having an attractive-sounding dish, as that would be chosen more, leaving them more room for error, lateness and dropping-on-the-floor-ness
I know it's entertaining, but I'm not sure what the point of all the tasks is - Larkin has had a mare of a week, with Marcus Sneering refusing to eat one of his courses, and then producing a pretty bog standard lemon tart for the Bond Laydeez, yet he has been put through to the final at the expense of Saira. I suppose J&G must be looking at the whole series, but it seems to me that Larkin peaked at the start with that wonderful miso soup affair with the flowers and funny mushrooms. I would like a bit more clarity and insight into the judging process please! Do J&G get the critics round a table to review the dishes? That would be fun to watch!