Sex Lies and Rinsing Guys

[sailorsgal]

they don't sleep with the guys! I don't believe it.

Got it!

Phew recording on 4+1

I will be back later to add my shocked thoughts and hoik my bossom indignantly!

I have sat here for an hour with catsbum mouth :o

Vile creature. I find it hard to believe they are not having sex. Also what sort of men do this, vunerable? Just watching on plus 4.

hifi a close friend of mine worked in the Mayfair for some time, she never gave me the impression it was like that - but I suspect you may be right !

Stupid Men.

That is all.

catsbum, & bosom firmly hoicked here. My DD is 16 & I will definitely be discussing this with her tomorrow. I would be ashamed & so so sad if she had any particle of the attitude those nasty, grasping, lazy, materialistic and shallow girls had toward life and other people.

"like nurses" - bollocks! The complete polar opposite AFAICS.

jeanette is foul.

Polly is horrible but seems vunerable herself.

Rinsing is a Jamaican term IME, it basically means to use someone for what you can get [mainly financially]

Funny to hear it spoken of as if they've just invented the term!

Jeanette was utterly vile.

Holly-cant believe she did that video call in a childs bedroom, no way is she not sleeping with those men.

Danica-while a complete user seemed to have her head screwed on a bit more.

Rinsing-actually it also means to overuse something. not just men!

Oddly I find Danica slightly less disturbing than the others. What with the website and not ever meeting the men, it seems more upfront that the men are just buying in to a fantasy.
The other two seem to be setting out to mislead the men into thinking there is more on offer, if only they buy a bigger/better gift then they will get to have sex/a girlfriend/whatever. It is so dishonest.

Agree danica is more of a business.

Its sad that Polly doesn't believe in true love.

Her pouting gets on my nerves.

i wonder how the ones with sons would feel if their sons were being rinsed in years to come.

it's also quite a short sighted career path. looks dont last forever and there's always younger prettier versions of you snapping at your heels.

and of course now that they have put their faces on national tv i doubt there will be as many men falling over themselves to throw gifts at women they know are fleecing them.

quite a scary moment when the man in new york was saying "wait til you really piss me off". i hope she wasn't staying alone with him?

Something the same on this morning a few weeks back and the girl had her flat, clothes, food etc provided for her for one man and they were just friends

how do any of them feel secure though?i think the girls danica looked as though she had a good income of her own through her modelling and probably will for a while but for the other two and the girl you talk about mopbucket, what do they do if it suddenly stops and they can't pay their bills? i mean the other two on that show had children to keep fed and sheltered. i certainly wouldn't want to be at the mercy of a strange man who i've been fleecing. never mind the risk that one of them decides to get revenge.

I cannot beleive they (the girls) allowed this to go on channel 4, there will be repurcussions- imagine Twitter? they will get crucified

I felt half scornful and half sad. that lap dancer/stilt walker/skype chat brunette one, just so sad

totally agree porca. i could maye see it as a bit of publicity for the girl called danica as it was very clear her 'rinsees' knew there would never be a meeting or relationship so perhaps it is men that are happy to shower gifts on someone the never meet but for the other two i could see them being crucified.

yes i felt really sorry for holly. it was so sad.

Its was very exploitative of channel 4. fuck up their lives (although they are doing that themselves) for the sake of XXXX advertising revenue

Oh well. hopefully the twitter hate will abate in a few weeks

Holls babe is same age as mine and it just made me feel so bloody sad

thta's ch4's trademark IMO. it's their bread and butter-exploitation.

he was adorable wasn't he?

i was very uncomfortable with her doing the skype chat whilst the children were there in the background. you could hear them playing and chattering. only a matter of time before that little one is picking up on the language she is using.

Whilst I take on board that it is typical channel 4 chudder I still have my gob wide open. I struggle to understand how women think so little of themselves that they have to depend on materialistic items to make them happy. More fool the men that oblige them, obviously more money than sense!!

what i really struggled to understand was. what is the actual point?

yes i get that having lovely jewellery and clothes etc is nice but dont the get bored after a while and think "i dont really need/want another negligee (sp) or a ring or shoes." i mean it's not much use having a set of 34 DDs if you can't afford to replace the washing machine. i dont get it. is their aim just to get as much free stuff as possible? where does that get them? in a house full of free stuff and what then? i feel sorry for them that they think that's something worth aiming for. it's just stuff. just fabric stitched together or metals melted into a shape that someone thinks is on trend. it doesn't mean you are worth that amount of money because those men aren't giving them to you, they're giving them to the person you have let them think you are. it's not real, and i imagine it's quite a lonely life.

Because you sell the presents and use the cash gifts to pay your bills. You aren't asking for things you want, you are asking for things with a high resale value.

It was all labels though wasn't it? Tiffany, Jimmy Choos, Louis Vuitton, rolex etc, etc.