MT7 - what if you are making assumption about why people took issue with the OP / thread title/
As it happens, some MN-ers feel more strongly about personal choice / comfort / freedom than they do about Style Diktats - and from MTH's list of 'what suits who one of the things I find most exasperating about MN is the plethora of threads bemoaning people who have the temerity to cause social offence by inflicting their flabby knees, bingo wings, straightened (too old for it!) / unstraightened (ugh - frizz!), aging skin, muffin tops..and crocs on the perfect yummy mummies of MN.
In fact my reaction to the OP (but didn't bother to post) was much the same as the reaction I had to an illustrated lecture / performance thing I went to by a Black British guy, Peckham through and through, who went on a 'back to roots' creative muse pilgramage to Ghana and came back in trauma because of what Ghanaian womn were doing to their hair - shock horror - wasting thier Sfrican-ness, not fulfilling thier duty as reposittory f his los sense of african-ness - how DARE they take the opportunity of choice and hairstyle?
Different things may or may not suit different people, but the most important point, surely, is that people do what they like, experiment successfully, or disastrously, or not give a damn, free of tutting and bosomey comment-did-you-see-that comment.
Perhaps 'racist' was used as a substitute for 'presumptionist' - and certainly deciding what one race should do (whether you are of that race or not) over an issue which is firmly linked to racial qualities, is making race the fulcrum of deciding what people 'should' or 'should not' do..... very close to the mechnims of racists, no?
It was some posts later that TH emphasised that she didn't ant to impose a 'should'...but it's hard to eve enter a discussion abou what 'suits'people without being just a little judgmental.