Right, I've just caught up on all the posts since last night.
Slim22, since you're the latest person to take extreme offence to what I've written, I'll address you first.
You say you live in Asia? So I presume I am right in thinking that you don't see black women all that often? So most likely the black women you do see are going to be celebrities, who, as we've established, have access to pots of cash for uber-expensive hairdos if they want it? In other words, not your average Jane Bloggs who (believe me, I see lots of them every day) settle for hair-breaking chemical straightening, or a cheap, crap-looking weave rather than enhancing what they've already got.
I do appreciate that it's important to you to challenge racism wherever you encounter it, and I wholeheartedly applaud that. However, as Mag7 said, in your eagerness to be colour blind, you appear to have developed an alternative blindness which leads you to perceive comments about colour/ 'race' either as non-racist (because you understand and agree with them) or racist (because you disagree with them, regardless of your level of understanding). In this instance, the problem is that your sensitivity to issues of colour has made you deeply misunderstand the conversation. Let me demonstrate. What is your response to the following statements:
Most obese people don't suit tight lycra outfits.
Most white people don't suit dreadlocks.
Most women with chubby knees don't suit mini skirts.
Most Asian people don't suit the 'Asian eye surgery' look.
Most elderly people don't suit clothing designed for teens.
I will make an assumption here, that perhaps you feel a tinge of discomfort at the 'white people' statement, but that on the whole you don't find any of the above statements as offensive as you found my statement that 'most black people don't suit straight hair'. It's quite possible that you may even see my 'Asian eye surgery' statement as being pro-Asian ethnicity. Why should my black people statement not be viewed in the same light?
Do you (or Dragonbutter) find any of the above statements to be 'deliberately provocative', or ageist/ fattist/ racist? Most likely not. Please be honest here, otherwise there's no point in us having this dialogue.
So your misunderstanding comes with honourable intentions, but you appear to also be unwilling to concede that you may have been wrong. Where does that leave us?