I apologise - my comment was poorly worded and I wasn’t intending to imply anything negative about women who choose to remove their public hair - as I said above, to each their own. It’s the assumption this is part of being “well-groomed” I have issue with.
After puberty boys and men can choose to shave their beards or not. For the most part, the default is for them to keep hair that develops elsewhere (underarms, legs) where it naturally appears.
This isn’t the case for girls, who just as they’re coping with periods and breasts and all the other challenging stuff of puberty must also start to maintain smooth underarms, legs and bikini lines to be considered ‘well-groomed’.
When I was young (long ago) this generally stopped at the bikini line. But, likely related to the advent of ubiquitous online porn and sexting, there are now new expectations about grooming intimate areas as well. And they again involve girls / women removing hair that naturally emerges as we mature.
I’ve learned a lot about what women themselves value about hair removal from this thread - comfort, better sex, etc. And I have no negative opinions whatsoever of women doing whatever they want to and with their bodies. (And I’m also not implying online porn and sexting are ‘bad’, just that they increase aesthetic focus on intimate areas.)
But I don’t agree that what you choose to do with your intimate areas should have any bearing on whether you consider yourself ‘well-groomed’. And I do resent the difference in expectation for men and women in this regard - and yes, that extends to underarms and legs.